[1]苗培培,赵祖军,赵筱青,等.云南典型石漠化区生态系统服务权衡与协同研究[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(04):366-374.
　MIAO Peipei,ZHAO Zujun,ZHAO Xiaoqing,et al.Study on Trade-off and Cooperation of Ecosystem Service Space in Rocky Desertification Area of Yunnan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(04):366-374.
点击复制

云南典型石漠化区生态系统服务权衡与协同研究

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 28 期数: 2021年04期 页码: 366-374 栏目: 出版日期: 2021-08-10
Title:
Study on Trade-off and Cooperation of Ecosystem Service Space in Rocky Desertification Area of Yunnan Province
文章编号:
1005-3409(2021)04-0366-09
作者:
苗培培1, 赵祖军1,2, 赵筱青1, 普军伟1, 李思楠1, 王 茜1, 谭 琨1
(1.云南大学 地球科学学院, 昆明 650000; 2.云南省生态环境监测中心, 昆明 650034)
Author(s):
MIAO Peipei1, ZHAO Zujun1,2, ZHAO Xiaoqing1, PU Junwei1, LI Sinan1, WANG Qian1, TAN Kun1
(1.School of Geographic Earth Sciences, Yunnan University, Kunming 650000, China; 2.Yunnan Ecological Environment Monitoring Center, Kunming 650034, China)
关键词:
广南县;  生态系统服务;  权衡与协同;  热点区
Keywords:
Guangnan County;  ecosystem services;  trade-off and synergy;  hot spot
分类号:
X171
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为研究人类活动对喀斯特山区生态系统服务产生的影响,以滇东南典型石漠化区广南县为研究区,选取6种生态系统服务从空间上与石漠化强度进行对比,并运用相关系数分析其权衡协同关系,通过热点图分析了其提供能力强弱的时空变化。结果表明:(1)2000—2018年,研究区食物供给和文化服务与石漠化程度空间分布基本无相关性,而土壤保持、固碳、产水量和生境服务与其分布基本呈负相关关系;(2)2000—2018年,研究区生境支持—固碳和土壤保持—固碳等呈协同关系,而产水量—土壤保持和产水量—生境支持等呈权衡关系;(3)2000—2018年,研究区热点区占比为“6类”>“5类”>“0类”>“1类”>“2类”>“3类”>“4类”; 空间上,“0类”为生态脆弱区且为无热点区,分布在中部和西南部的石漠化中度区域; “6类”为供给能力最高的区域,主要分布在北部及东北部。总之,石漠化区生态系统服务功能较无石漠化区低且基本为无热点区,但权衡协同关系较为显著。因此,应继续采取相应的生态恢复措施。
Abstract:
In order to study the impact of human activities on ecosystem services in karst mountainous areas, Guangnan County, a typical rocky desertification area in southeastern Yunnan Province, was selected as the research area. Six ecosystem services were selected for spatial comparison with rocky desertification intensity, and correlation coefficients were used to analyze its trade-off and synergy relationship, and the heat maps were used to analyze temporal and spatial changes of its providing capabilities. The results show that:(1)from 2000 to 2018, food supply and cultural services in the study area were basically not related to the spatial distribution of rocky desertification, while soil conservation, carbon sequestration, water production, and habitat services were basically negatively related to their distribution;(2)from 2000 to 2018, the study area had a synergistic relationship between habitat support-carbon sequestration and soil conservation-carbon sequestration, while water production-soil conservation and water production-habitat support had the trade-off relationship;(3)from 2000 to 2018, the proportion of hotspots in the study area decreased in the order: ‘category 6'>‘category 5'>‘category 0'> ‘category 1'>‘category 2'>‘category 3'>‘category 4'; spatially, ‘category 0' was the ecologically fragile area with no hotspots, and distributed in the middle and southwestern rocky desertification areas, ‘category 6' was the area with the highest supply capacity, mainly distributed in the north and northeast. Corresponding ecological restoration measures should be continued. Priority protection is required.

参考文献/References:

[1] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being[M]. Washington DC, USA: Island Press, 2005.
[2] 韩会庆.喀斯特生态系统服务研究进展与展望[J].中国岩溶,2017,36(3):352-358.
[3] 王亚芳.生态系统服务及其价值评估研究进展[J].环境与发展,2019,31(7):1-3.
[4] 傅伯杰,吕一河,高光耀.中国主要陆地生态系统服务与生态安全研究的重要进展[J].自然杂志,2012,34(5):261-272.
[5] Li C, Zheng H, Li S, et al. Impacts of conservation and human development policy across stakeholders and scales[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,112(24),7396-7401.
[6] 傅伯杰,周国逸,白永飞,等.中国主要陆地生态系统服务功能与生态安全[J].地球科学进展,2009,24(6):571-576.
[7] Firbank L, Bradbury R B, Mccracken D I, et al. Delivering multiple ecosystem services from enclosed farmland in the UK[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2013,166:65-75.
[8] Yang G, Ge W, Xue H, et al. Using ecosystem service bundles to detect trade-offs and synergies across urban-rural complexes[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2015,136:110-121.
[9] Swallow B M, Sang J K, Nyabenge M, et al. Tradeoffs, synergies and traps among ecosystem services in the Lake Victoria basin of East Africa[J]. Environmental Science and Policy,2008,12(4):504-519.
[10] 王晓峰,马雪,冯晓明,等.重点脆弱生态区生态系统服务权衡与协同关系时空特征[J].生态学报,2019,39(20):7344-7355.
[11] 孙艺杰,任志远,郝梦雅,等.黄土高原生态系统服务权衡与协同时空变化及影响因素:以延安市为例[J].生态学报,2019,39(10):3443-3454.
[12] Bagstad K J, Semmens D, Waage S, et al. A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2013,5:27-39.
[13] 巩杰,柳冬青,高秉丽,等.西部山区流域生态系统服务权衡与协同关系:以甘肃白龙江流域为例[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(4):1278-1288.
[14] 潘竟虎,李真.干旱内陆河流域生态系统服务空间权衡与协同作用分析[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(17):280-289.
[15] 尹礼唱,王晓峰,张琨,等.国家屏障区生态系统服务权衡与协同[J].地理研究,2019,38(9):2162-2172.
[16] 韩会庆.贵州省生态系统服务变化及驱动机理研究[D].广州:中山大学,2016.
[17] 普军伟.基于资源环境承载力的喀斯特山区土地利用优化[D].昆明:云南大学,2019.
[18] 广南县统计局.广南县建州六十周年经济社会发展成就报告[R].云南文山:广南统计局,2018.
[19] Groten S. NDVI-crop monitoring and early yield assessment of Burkina Faso[J]. Remote Sensing, 1993,14(8),1495-1515.
[20] 王亚慧,戴尔阜,马良,等.横断山区产水量时空分布格局及影响因素研究[J].自然资源学报,2020,35(2):371-386.
[21] 高翔宇,王刚,顾泽贤,等.基于USLE的西盟县土壤侵蚀特征分析[J].中国水土保持,2016(2):52-56,73.
[22] 朱文泉,潘耀忠,张锦水.中国陆地植被净初级生产力遥感估算[J].植物生态学报,2007,31(3):413-424.
[23] 陈峰,李红波,刘亚静.基于GIS和CASA的滇南山区植被NPP时空分异及其影响因素:以云南省元阳县为例[J].生态学杂志,2018,37(7):2148-2158.
[24] 黄木易,岳文泽,冯少茹,等.基于InVEST模型的皖西大别山区生境质量时空演化及景观格局分析[J].生态学报,2020,40(9):2895-2906.
[25] Chen N, Li H, Wang L. A GIS-based approach for mapping direct use value of ecosystem services at a county scale: Management implications[J]. Ecological Economics, 2009,68(11):2768-2776.
[26] 吴瑞东.“三江并流”区生态系统服务空间权衡与协同关系研究[D].昆明:云南大学,2016.
[27] 郎焱卿.喀斯特山区生态服务功能的权衡研究[D].重庆:重庆交通大学,2017.
[28] 章维鑫,吴秀芹,于洋,等.2005—2015年小江流域生态系统服务供需变化及对石漠化的响应[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(5):139-150.
[29] Lang Y, Song W. Trade-off analysis of ecosystem services in the karst mountainous area, China[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2018,10(3).DOI:10.3390/w10030300.

相似文献/References:

[1]李 龙,吴大放,刘艳艳.国内外土地利用与生态系统服务研究热点与趋势——基于CiteSpace计量分析[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(05):396.
　LI Long,WU Dafang,LIU Yanyan.Hotspots and Trends of the Researches for Land Use and Ecosystem Service-Based on CiteSpace[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(04):396.
[2]牟雪洁,王夏晖,张 箫,等.北京市延庆区生态系统生产总值核算及空间化[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(01):265.
　MOU Xuejie,WANG Xiahui,ZHANG Xiao,et al.Accounting and Mapping of Gross Ecosystem Product in Yanqing District, Beijing[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(04):265.
[3]于 媛,韩 玲,李明玉,等.哈长城市群生态系统服务时空特征及其权衡/协同关系研究[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(02):293.
　YU Yuan,HAN Ling,LI Mingyu,et al.Study on the Spatial-Temporal Characteristics of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs/Synergies in Ha-Chang Urban Agglomeration[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(04):293.
[4]李 辉,张晓媛,国洪磊.基于土地利用的三峡库区近30年生态系统服务价值时空变化特征[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(02):309.
　LI Hui,ZHANG Xiaoyuan,GUO Honglei.Spatial and Temporal Changes of Ecosystem Service Value in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area in the Past 30 Years Based on Land Use[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(04):309.
[5]程 静,黄 越.宁夏回族自治区生态系统服务价值时空演变及其驱动力[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(02):382.
　CHENG Jing,HUANG Yue.Spatiotemporal Evolution of Ecosystem Services Value and Its Driving Forces in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(04):382.
[6]裴宏伟,刘孟竹,李雅丽,等.生态修复措施对干旱半干旱地区生态系统服务影响研究——以河北坝上地区为例[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(02):192.
　PEI Hongwei,LIU Mengzhu,LI Yali,et al.Impact of Ecological Restoration Measures on Ecosystem Services in Arid and Semi-arid Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(04):192.
[7]陈 安,李景吉,王茂生,等.西藏“一江两河”流域生态系统服务变化及权衡与协同关系研究[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(02):313.
　CHEN An,LI Jingji,WANG Maosheng,et al.Research for Change of Ecosystem Service and the Tradeoff-Synergy Relation of the YLN Basin in the Tibet Autonomous Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(04):313.
[8]韦绍音,陆汝成,林晓楠,等.基于土地利用转型的广西边境地区生态服务功能交叉敏感性分析[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(03):308.
　WEI Shaoyin,LU Rucheng,LIN Xiaonan,et al.Cross-Sensitivity Analysis of Ecological Service Function in Guangxi Border Region Based on Land Use Transition[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(04):308.
[9]张 斌,李 璐,夏秋月,等.基于土地利用的武汉城市圈生态系统服务权衡/协同分析[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(04):377.
　ZHANG Bin,LI Lu,XIA Qiuyue,et al.Trade off/Synergy Analysis of Ecosystem Services in Wuhan City Circle Based on Land Use[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(04):377.
[10]张师赫,李宝银,林玉英,等.基于生态系统服务的景观生态风险评价及其驱动因素研究——以福建省为例[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(06):174.
　ZHANG Shihe,LI Baoyin,LIN Yuying,et al.Research on Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment and Driving Factors Based on Ecosystem Services[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(04):174.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2020-06-09 修回日期:2020-09-06
资助项目:云南省科技厅—云南大学联合基金[2018FY001(-017)]; 国家自然科学基金(41361020); 云南大学研究生创新人才培养项目(C176230200); 云南省教育厅科学研究资助项目(2018Y001)
第一作者:苗培培(1991—),男,河南永城人,硕士,研究方向为土地利用/覆被变化的生态环境效应与景观生态安全格局。E-mail:1029907902@qq.com
通信作者:赵祖军(1976—),男,云南昆明人,工程师,硕士,主要从事环境监测分析工作。E-mail:zhaozujun@ynem.com

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-08-20