MA Yali,LI Xin,SUN Dongyuan,et al.Variation Characteristics Relation of Runoff in the Mainstream and Tributaries Between Zhouqu and Wudu Region of Bailong River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(03):94-100.
白龙江舟曲—武都区间干支流径流变化特征关系
- Title:
- Variation Characteristics Relation of Runoff in the Mainstream and Tributaries Between Zhouqu and Wudu Region of Bailong River
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2021)03-0094-07
- Keywords:
- tributary; runoff change; trend analysis; mutation analysis; Bailong River
- 分类号:
- P333.3
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 河川径流是水资源的重要组成部分,探究白龙江舟曲—武都区间干支流的径流变化特征及其关系,对认识该区域水资源状况及其合理开发利用具有重要意义。基于白龙江干支流5个水文站实测径流资料,采用累积距平法、双累积曲线、Mann-Kendall检验等方法,对白龙江干支流1981—2015年径流变化特征关系进行分析研究。结果表明:各站年径流量整体呈显著下降趋势,显著性水平均在0.05以上,径流减少的倾向率舟曲—武都区间干流、黄鹿坝、宕昌、马街分别为-2.16,-0.84,-0.56,-0.05亿m3/10 a,舟曲—武都区间干流35年间减少量高达7.56亿m3,相比区间干流减少量,支流拱坝河减少量占比38.89%,对于区间干流的变化有明显影响。舟曲—武都区间干流多年平均径流量14.13亿m3/a,区间入流以6.01亿m3/a占比42.56%,北峪河马街站占比最小仅为0.99%,区间入流量明显高于支流径流量。区间干流及3个支流年径流突变的临界年份分别为1986年、1986年、1994年、1991年。拱坝河支流对舟曲—武都区间干流径流变化影响最大,影响率高达44.97%,其次区间入流、岷江支流分别为37.74%,16.29%,小支流北峪河的影响最小仅为1%。
- Abstract:
- River runoff is an important part of water resources. It is of great significance to explore the characteristics and relations of runoff changes of the mainstream and tributaries between Zhouqu and Wudu region of Bailong River for understanding the regional water resources situation and its rational development and utilization. Based on the measured runoff data of five hydrological stations in the mainstream and tributaries of the Bailong River, we used anomaly accumulation, double accumulation curve, Mann-Kendall test to analyze and study the characteristic relationship of runoff change of the mainstream and tributaries in the Bailong River from 1981 to 2015. The results showed that: the runoff of all stations showed a downward trend overall and the significance level reached above 0.05; the trend rate of runoff reduction were -2.16, -0.84, -0.56 and -0.05 hundred million m3/decade for the main stream of zhouqu—wudu interval, Huangluba, Dangchang, Majie, and the decrease was 75.6 million m3 for the main stream between Zhouqu and Wudu in 35 years; compared with the reduction of the interval mainstream, the reduction of Gongba River accounted for 38.89%, which had a significant influence on the change of the interval mainstream; the average annual runoff of mainstream between Zhouqu and Wudu in Bailong River was 1.413 billion m3 and the interval inflow was 601 million m3/a, accounting for 42.56%, and that of Majie station in the Beiyu River was 0.99% at the minimum; the interval inflow was significantly higher than the tributary runoff; the critical years of annual runoff abrupt transition in the mainstream and the three tributaries were 1986, 1986, 1994 and 1991, respectively; the Gongba River had the greatest influence on the runoff change of the mainstream between Zhouqu and Wudu with an influence rate of 44.97%, followed by 37.74% and 16.29% for the interval inflow and Minjiang River, and the least influence was 1% for the small tributary Beiyu River.
参考文献/References:
[1] Hu W, Liu H, Bao A, et al. Influences of environmental changes on water storage variations in Central Asia[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2018,28(7):985-1000.[2] 王国庆,张建云,管晓祥,等.中国主要江河径流变化成因定量分析[J].水科学进展,2020,31(3):313-323.[3] Wang G, Wang Y. Managing water for sustainable utilization as China warms[J]. International Journal of Environmental Sciences & Natural Resources, 2019,17(1):10-13.[4] 贾飞飞,李鑫,孙翠洋,等.1951—2016年黄羊河流域径流变化特征及影响因素分析[J].辽宁师范大学学报:自然科学版,2019,42(2):262-267.[5] 冯禹昊.基于Morlet小波的辽河径流量变化及其成因分析[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(2):208-215.[6] 赵阳,胡春宏,张晓明.近70年黄河流域水沙情势及其成因分析[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(21):112-119.[7] 刘昌明,田巍,刘小莽,等.黄河近百年径流量变化分析与认识[J].人民黄河,2019,41(10):11-15.[8] 王娇,姜仁贵,解建仓,等.泾河流域径流量变化特征研究[J].水资源与水工程学报,2018,29(6):88-93.[9] 巩杰,马学成,张玲玲,等.基于InVEST模型的甘肃白龙江流域生境质量时空分异[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(3):191-196.[10] 陈宗良,叶振南,王志宏,等.白龙江流域中上游第四纪沉积物的发育特征及其灾害效应[J].水文地质工程地质,2019,46(2):29-36.[11] 魏宏庆,沈永平,魏鹂慧,等.白龙江中游干旱河谷水土流失与地理环境[J].干旱区地理,2019,42(5):1023-1028.[12] 张晓晓,张钰,徐浩杰.白龙江上游径流变化特征及其对降水和人类活动的响应[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(2):14-19,26.[13] 巩杰,柳冬青,马学成,等.甘肃省白龙江流域生态承载力的时空变化[J].水土保持通报,2017,37(6):242-247.[14] 白君瑞,徐宗学,班春广,等.基于Z指数的雅鲁藏布江流域径流丰枯变化及其特征分析[J].北京师范大学学报:自然科学版,2019,55(6):715-723.[15] 李勃,穆兴民,高鹏,等.1956—2017年黄河干流径流量时空变化新特征[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(6):120-126,132.[16] 孙栋元,齐广平,马彦麟,等.疏勒河干流径流变化特征研究[J].干旱区地理,2020,43(2):1-13.[17] 李琬欣,熊东红,张素,等.四川凉山州孙水河流域近60年来径流趋势特征分析[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(2):130-137.[18] 赵阳,胡春宏,张晓明,等.近70年黄河流域水沙情势及其成因分析[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(21):112-119.[19] Zhao G, Li E, Mu X, et al. Changing trends and regime shift of streamflow in the Yellow River basin[J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2015,29(5):1331-1343.[20] 冯家豪,赵广举,穆兴民,等.黄河中游区间干支流径流变化特征与归因分析[J].水力发电学报,2020,39(4):1-15.
相似文献/References:
[1]赵克玉,王小艳.小浪底水库运用初期支流淤积形态分析[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(05):168.
ZHAO Ke-yu,WANG Xiao-yan.The Deposition Feature in Branch Rivers in Reservoir Region of XLD Project[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(03):168.
[2]刘酌希,陈 鑫,管晓祥,等.变化环境下洮河流域径流变化归因[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(05):87.
LIU Zhuoxi,CHEN Xin,GUAN Xiaoxiang,et al.Attribution of Runoff Change in the Taohe River Basin Under a Changing Environment[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(03):87.
[3]王一然,丁文峰,张冠华.基于SWAT模型的丹江流域土地利用变化对径流影响研究[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(04):62.
WANG Yiran,DING Wenfeng,ZHANG Guanhua.Study on the Impact of Land Use Change on Runoff in Danjiang Watershed Based on SWAT Model[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(03):62.
[4]杨雪琪,武 玮,郑从奇,等.基于Budyko假设的沂河流域径流变化归因识别[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(02):100.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.02.020]
YANG Xueqi,WU Wei,ZHENG Congqi,et al.Attribution Identification of Runoff Change in Yihe River Basin Based on Budyko Hypothesis[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(03):100.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.02.020]
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2020-06-16 修回日期:2020-07-01资助项目:甘肃省水利科学试验研究与技术推广计划项目(甘水科外发[2018]70号-3,甘水科外发[2017]76号-10); 甘肃农业大学水利水电工程学院青年教师科技创新基金(SLSDXY-QN2019-04)第一作者:马亚丽(1987—),女,河北保定人,助教,主要从事水文与水资源方面的研究。E-mail:gsaumayl@163.com通信作者:孙栋元(1978—),男,甘肃省民乐县人,博士,教授级高级工程师,主要从事水文水资源与干旱区水土资源方面的研究工作。E-mail:gsausundy@126.com