LI Tingting,WEI Caihui,DONG Wenbin,et al.Effects of Sod Culture and Slope on Losses of Nitrogen and Phosphorus in the Surface Runoff of Orchards of Northeast Guangxi[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(03):59-64.
生草栽培与坡度对桂东北坡地果园地表径流氮磷流失的影响
- Title:
- Effects of Sod Culture and Slope on Losses of Nitrogen and Phosphorus in the Surface Runoff of Orchards of Northeast Guangxi
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2021)03-0059-06
- Keywords:
- sod culture; slope; total nitrogen loss; total phosphorus loss
- 分类号:
- S157.1
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 对桂东北坡地果园地表径流氮磷流失进行研究,为该区养分流失控制提供数据支撑和科学依据。在野外自然降雨条件下研究了不同坡度(即坡度为12°,23°,42°)金桔园间种雀稗(Paspalum thunbergii)和白花藿香蓟(Ageratum conyzoides)后果园氮、磷养分流失状况。结果表明:随着坡度升高,同一生草栽培的地表径流总氮、总磷、氨氮及硝态氮平均含量增加。相对于清耕处理,间种雀稗后金桔园地表径流总氮、总磷、氨氮及硝态氮流失量分别减少4.61%～24.55%,15.30%～26.49%,9.97%～48.03%和17.46%～96.46%。间种白花藿香蓟后地表径流总氮、总磷、氨氮及硝态氮流失量分别减少9.15%～16.17%,10.09%～13.16%,1.90%～33.19%和11.67%～19.41%。生草栽培、坡度及两者的交互作用对总氮和总磷流失量均有极显著的影响(p<0.001),生草栽培对地表径流氮磷流失量的抑制作用随着坡度升高而减弱,而坡度对地表径流氮磷流失量的增加作用则增强。雀稗对总氮和总磷流失量降低的相对贡献指数高于白花藿香蓟。随着坡度升高,同一生草栽培处理的土壤养分含量下降。同一坡度下雀稗控制养分流失效果优于白花藿香蓟,生草栽培的存在可在一定程度上削弱坡度对果园坡面氮磷流失的增加作用。
- Abstract:
- In order to provide data support and scientific basis for nutrient loss control in Northeast Guangxi, the losses of nitrogen and phosphorus in surface runoff of orchard were studied. Under the condition of natural rainfall in the field, Paspalum thunbergii and Ageratum conyzoides were intercropped in Kumquat orchards under different slope conditions(i.e.,12°,23°,42°), and the effects of the losses of two kinds of grass culture components were compared and analyzed. The results showed that, with the increase of slope gradient, the average contents of total nitrogen, total phosphorus, ammonia nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen in the runoff of the same life grass cultivation increased. Compared with clear ploughing, Paspalum thunbergii reduced the losses of total nitrogen, total phosphorus, ammonia nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen by 4.61%～24.55%, 15.30%～26.49%, 9.97%～48.03% and 17.46%～96.46%, respectively. The losses of total nitrogen, total phosphorus, ammonia nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen of Ageratum conyzoides were 9.15%～16.17%, 10.09%～13.16%, 1.90%～33.19% and 11.67%～19.41%, respectively. The effect of grass growth on the losses of total nitrogen and total phosphorus was significant(p< 0.001). With the increase of slope gradient, the inhibition of grass cultivation on the amount of nitrogen and phosphorus loss decreased, while the promotion of slope on the amount of nitrogen and phosphorus loss increased. The relative contribution index of Paspalum thunbergii to the losses of total nitrogen and total phosphorus was higher than that of Ageratum conyzoides. With the increase of slope gradient, the soil nutrient content of the same life grass decreased. The control effect of Paspalum thunbergii on nutrient loss was better than that of Ageratum conyzoides. The existence of grass cultivation can weaken the increasing effect of slope on the losses of nitrogen and phosphorus in surface runoff to some extent.
参考文献/References:
[1] 高儒学,戴全厚,甘艺贤,等.不同雨强下喀斯特坡耕地养分流失特征研究[J].土壤学报,2019,56(5):1072-1084.[2] 徐明,张健,刘国彬,等.黄土丘陵区不同植被恢复模式对沟谷地土壤碳氮磷元素的影响[J].草地学报,2015,23(1):62-68.[3] 赵明松,李德成,张甘霖,等.基于RUSLE模型的安徽省土壤侵蚀及其养分流失评估[J].土壤学报,2016,53(1):28-38.[4] 韩晓飞,高明,谢德体,等.减磷配施有机肥对紫色土旱坡地磷素流失的消减效应[J].环境科学,2016,37(7):2770-2778.[5] 常松果,胡雪琴,史东梅,等.不同土壤管理措施下坡耕地产流产沙和氮磷流失特征[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(5):34-40.[6] 王全九,赵光旭,刘艳丽,等.植被类型对黄土坡地产流产沙及氮磷流失的影响[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(14):195-201.[7] 李太魁,张香凝,寇长林,等.丹江口库区坡耕地柑橘园套种绿肥对氮磷径流流失的影响[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(2):94-98.[8] 高小叶,张兴兴,朱建国,等.生草栽培对果园面源污染的控制:3种牧草的比较研究[J].草业学报,2015,24(2):49-54.[9] 李发林,谢南松,郑域茹,等.生草栽培方式对坡地果园氮磷流失的控制效果[J].福建农林大学学报:自然科学版,2014,43(3):304-311.[10] 张佳崎,马悦,张瑞芳,等.不同种植模式和坡度对片麻岩山坡地氮素流失的影响[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(3):8-13.[11] 刘俏,张丽萍,胡响明,等.红壤丘陵区经济林坡地氮磷流失特征[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(3):185-190.[12] 霍洪江,汪涛,魏世强,等.三峡库区紫色土坡耕地氮素流失特征及其坡度的影响[J].西南大学学报:自然科学版,2013,35(11):112-117.[13] 邬燕虹,张丽萍,邓龙洲,等.坡面氮素流失的坡度和雨强效应模拟研究[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(2):27-33.[14] 袁久芹,梁音,曹龙熹,等.红壤坡耕地不同植物篱配置模式减流减沙效益对比[J].土壤,2015,47(2):400-407.[15] 刘光崧,蒋能慧,张连第,等.土壤理化分析与剖面描述[M].北京:中国标准出版社,1996,137-183.[16] 程琴娟,蔡强国,廖义善.土壤表面特性与坡度对产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持学报,2007,21(2):9-11,15.[17] 曹梓豪,赵清贺,丁圣彦,等.坡度和植被盖度对河岸坡面侵蚀产沙特征的影响[J].自然资源学报,2017,32(11):1892-1904.[18] 朱楠,张会兰,马超,等.北京延庆县雨型和坡面措施对水沙及污染物的影响[J].生态学杂志,2015,34(12):3509-3517.[19] 秦伟,左长清,晏清洪,等.红壤裸露坡地次降雨土壤侵蚀规律[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(2):124-132.[20] 刘宗岸,杨京平,杨正超,等.苕溪流域茶园不同种植模式下地表径流氮磷流失特征[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(2):29-32,44.[21] 王华玲,赵建伟,程东升,等.不同植被缓冲带对坡耕地地表径流中氮磷的拦截效果[J].农业环境科学学报,2010,29(9):1730-1736.[22] 张亚丽,李怀恩,张兴昌,等.牧草覆盖对坡面土壤矿质氮素流失的影响[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(12):2297-2301.[23] 李秋艳,蔡强国,方海燕,等.长江上游紫色土地区不同坡度坡耕地水保措施的适宜性分析[J].资源科学,2009,31(12):2157-2163.[24] 杨洪晓,周美华,李俊良,等.温带果园护土生草鼠茅草的腐解和养分释放[J].草业学报,2015,24(4):208-213.[25] 曹铨,沈禹颖,王自奎,等.生草对果园土壤理化性状的影响研究进展[J].草业学报,2016,25(8):180-188.[26] 王艳廷,冀晓昊,吴玉森,等.我国果园生草的研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(6):1892-1900.[27] 庞群虎,宋丽华,王竞,等.生草当年对枣园土壤性状及红枣品质的影响[J].西北林学院学报,2019,34(1):124-129.
相似文献/References:
[1]陈 龙,刘春兰,裴 厦,等.北京湾过渡带生态系统服务地形梯度效应评价[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(04):247.
CHEN Long,LIU Chunlan,PEI Sha,et al.Evaluation of the Effect Terrain Gradient of Ecosystem Services in the Transitional Zone of Beijing Bay[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(03):247.
[2]陈金珂,蒲俊兵,李建鸿,等.典型岩溶流域不同坡度等级下的土壤侵蚀与石漠化分布特征耦合分析[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(05):1.
CHEN Jinke,PU Junbing,LI Jianhong,et al.Coupling of Rocky Desertification Distribution and Soil Erosion Under Different Slope Grades in a Typical Karst Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(03):1.
[3]田 培,仇浩然,冯 宇,等.雨强和坡度对红壤坡面产流产沙及侵蚀动力过程影响[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(06):1.
TIAN Pei,QIU Haoran,FENG Yu,et al.Effects of Rainfall Intensity and Slope Gradient on Runoff and Sediment Production and Erosion Dynamic Process on Red Soil Slope[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(03):1.
[4]刘鸿涛,李起龙,韩 宇,等.PAM对寒区粉壤土堤防护坡产流产沙特征的影响[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(06):14.
LIU Hongtao,LI Qilong,HAN Yu,et al.Effect of PAM on the Characteristics of Runoff and Sediment Yield in Protection Slope of Embankment of Silty Loam in Cold Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(03):14.
[5]苏远逸,李 鹏,任宗萍,等.坡度对黄土坡面产流产沙过程及水沙关系的影响[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(02):118.
SU Yuanyi,LI Peng,REN Zongping,et al.Effect of Slope Gradient on the Process of Runoff and Sediment Yield and Water-Sediment Relation on the Loess Slope[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(03):118.
[6]王 涵,赵怡凯,陈祥伟,等.降雨强度和坡度对黑土坡耕地团聚体流失特征的影响[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(01):11.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.20220309.001]
WANG Han,ZHAO Yikai,CHEN Xiangwei,et al.Effects of Rainfall Intensity and Slope Gradient on the Characteristics of Soil Aggregate Loss in Black Soil Sloping Field[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(03):11.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.20220309.001]
[7]陈泽勋,吴英杰,王文君,等.不同放牧条件下坡面初始产流时间和径流流速变化特征[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(03):62.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.03.038]
CHEN Zexun,WU Yingjie,WANG Wenjun,et al.Characteristics of Initial Yield Time and Velocity of Runoff Under Different Grazing Conditions[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(03):62.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.03.038]
[8]敖利满,蒋超华,徐勤学,等.岩面形态对西南喀斯特坡地产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(05):52.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.05.005.]
AO Liman,JIANG Chaohua,XU Qinxue,et al.Influence of Rock Surface Morphology on Runoff and Sediment in Karst Slope of Southwest China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(03):52.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.05.005.]
[9]黄 俊,金平伟,姜学兵.径流深和侵蚀量与集水面积、坡度及降雨量关系研究[J].水土保持研究,2024,31(03):135.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.03.033]
Huang Jun,Jin Pingwei,Jiang Xuebing.Study on the Relationship Between Runoff Depth, Erosion Yield and Catchment Area, Slope and Rainfall[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(03):135.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.03.033]
[10]韦美敬,黄艳荟,杨浩宇,等.不同坡度下蔗地土壤侵蚀及氮素流失对雨型和甘蔗生育期的响应[J].水土保持研究,2024,31(05):35.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.05.020]
Wei Meijing,Huang Yanhui,Yang Haoyu,et al.Response of Soil Erosion and Nitrogen Loss to Rainfall Pattern and Sugarcane Growth Period at Different Slopes[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(03):35.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.05.020]
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2020-07-07 修回日期:2020-07-24资助项目:国家现代农业产业技术体系(CARS-22); 广西创新驱动发展专项资金项目(桂科AA17204097); 广西特色作物试验站项目(桂TS201417); 广西农业科学院科技发展基金资助项目(桂农科2017JM09,2020YM112); 广西农业科学院基本科研业务专项(桂农科2018YT08,2018YT07,2021YT040)第一作者:李婷婷(1988—),女,广西柳城县人,硕士研究生,助理研究员,主要研究方向:农业生态环境可持续发展。E-mail:litt@gxaac.com通信作者:何铁光(1976—),男,湖南桂阳县人,博士,研究员,主要研究方向:环境生态。E-mail:tghe118@163.com