[1]于 媛,韩 玲,李明玉,等.哈长城市群生态系统服务时空特征及其权衡/协同关系研究[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(02):293-300.
　YU Yuan,HAN Ling,LI Mingyu,et al.Study on the Spatial-Temporal Characteristics of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs/Synergies in Ha-Chang Urban Agglomeration[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(02):293-300.
点击复制

哈长城市群生态系统服务时空特征及其权衡/协同关系研究

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 28 期数: 2021年02期 页码: 293-300 栏目: 出版日期: 2021-02-06
Title:
Study on the Spatial-Temporal Characteristics of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs/Synergies in Ha-Chang Urban Agglomeration
文章编号:
1005-3409(2021)02-0293-08
作者:
于 媛1,2, 韩 玲1, 李明玉1, 相恒星2, 王宗明2,3, 张世栋1,2, 杨 桄 4
(1.延边大学 地理与海洋科学学院, 吉林 延吉 133002; 2.中国科学院 东北地理与农业生态研究所 湿地生态与环境重点实验室, 长春 130102; 3.国家地球系统科学数据中心, 北京 100101; 4.空军航空大学, 长春130000)
Author(s):
YU Yuan1,2, HAN Ling1, LI Mingyu1, XIANG Hengxing2, WANG Zongming2,3, ZHANG Shidong1,2, YANG Guang 4
(1.College of Geography and Marine Science, Yanbian University, Yanji, Jilin 133002, China; 2.Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Environment, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130102, China; 3.National Earth System Science Data Center of China, Beijing 100101, China; 4.Aviation University Air Force, Changchun 130000, China)
关键词:
哈长城市群;  生态系统服务;  权衡协同度;  区域异质性
Keywords:
Ha-Chang urban agglomeration;  ecosystem services;  tradeoffs synergies degree;  regional differences
分类号:
X171.1
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
哈长城市群位列国家二级城市群之首,研究哈长城市群地区的生态系统服务变化及权衡协同关系对促进该区域可持续发展具有深远意义。基于多源遥感数据结合InVEST模型及权衡协同度模型(ESTD),分析了哈长城市群2000年、2010年、2015年土地覆被变化; 评估了土壤保持、生态系统碳储量及产水量3种生态系统服务的时空分布及其权衡协同关系。结果表明:(1)2000—2015年,哈长城市群内建设用地共增加1 462 km2,其中,2000—2010年增长量(958 km2)高于2010—2015年(504 km2),15年间林地共增加1 527 km2,草地、耕地及裸地分别减少661 km2,1 611 km2,780 km2;(2)15年间土壤保持量持续降低,生态系统碳储量先减后增,产水量先增后减;(3)6种土地覆被类型中,单位面积下林地提供的土壤保持力最高,湿地提供的生态系统碳储量和产水量最高;(4)协同作用在哈长城市群3种生态系统服务间占主导地位; 南部的土壤保持—生态系统碳储量及土壤保持—产水量多为协同关系,北部相反,从全区来看生态系统碳储量—产水量间的相关关系相对较弱。研究结果可为哈长城市群地区制定更为全面具体的生态保护策略提供参考依据。
Abstract:
Ha-Chang urban agglomeration ranks first in the national second-tier city group. Studying the changes of ecosystem services and weighing the synergy between the Ha-Chang urban agglomeration areas is of far-reaching significance to promote the sustainable development of the region. Based on multi-source remote sensing data combined with InVEST model and trade-off synergy model(ESTD), we analyzed the land cover changes in 2000, 2010 and 2015 of Ha-Chang urban agglomeration, the spatial-temporal distribution of three ecosystem services, soil conservation, carbon storage and water production, and their tradeoff synergy relationship. The results show that:(1)from 2000 to 2015, the total construction land in the Ha-Chang urban agglomeration increased by 1 462 km2; among them, the growth rate from 2000 to 2010(958 km2)was higher than that from 2010 to 2015(504 km2); in the past 15 years, the forest land increased by 1 527 km2, and the grassland, cultivated land and bare land decreased by 661 km2,1 611 km2 and 780 km2, respectively;(2)in the past 15 years, the amount of soil conservation continued to decrease, the carbon storage decreased first and then increased, and the water yield increased first and then decreased;(3)among the six types of land cover, the forest land provided the highest soil conservation capacity per unit area, and the wetland provided the highest carbon storage and water yield;(4)synergism was dominant among the three ecosystem services of Ha-Chang urban agglomeration; the soil conservation-carbon storage and soil conservation-water production in the south were mostly synergistic, on the contrary in the North, from the whole area, the correlation between carbon storage-water production was relatively weak. The results can provide the reference for the development of more comprehensive and specific ecological protection strategies in the Ha-Chang urban agglomeration area.

参考文献/References:

[1] Daily G C. Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems [M]. Washington D C: Island Press, 1997.
[2] Costanza R, Darge R, De Groot R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997,387(6630):253-260.
[3] Bennett E M, Peterson G D, Gordon L J. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services [J]. Ecology Letters, 2009,12(12):1394-1404.
[4] 李双成,张才玉,刘金龙,等.生态系统服务权衡与协同研究进展及地理学研究议题[J].地理研究,2013,32(8):1379-1390.
[5] Qiu J, Turner M G. Spatial interactions among ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural watershed[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013,110(29):12149-12154.
[6] Rodríguez J, Beard Jr T D, Bennett E, et al. Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services [J]. Ecology and Society, 2006,11(1),709-723.
[7] 戴尔阜,王晓莉,朱建佳,等.生态系统服务权衡:方法,模型与研究框架[J].地理研究,2016,35(6):1005-1016.
[8] 李鹏,姜鲁光,封志明,等.生态系统服务竞争与协同研究进展[J].生态学报,2012,32(16):5219-5229.
[9] 曹祺文,卫晓梅,吴健生.生态系统服务权衡与协同研究进展[J].生态学杂志,2016,35(11):3102-3111.
[10] Li Y, Zhang L, Qiu J, et al. Spatially explicit quantification of the interactions among ecosystem services [J]. Landscape Ecology, 2017,32(6):1181-1199.
[11] Vidal-Legaz B, Martínez-Fernández J, Picón A S, et al. Trade-offs between maintenance of ecosystem services and socio-economic development in rural mountainous communities in southern Spain: a dynamic simulation approach[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2013,131:280-297.
[12] MA(Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). Ecosystem and Human Well-Being[J]. Washington D C: Island Press, 2005.
[13] Smith P, Ashmore M R, Black H I J, et al. The role of ecosystems and their management in regulating climate, and soil, water and air quality [J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2013,50(4):812-829.
[14] 冉凤维,罗志军,吴佳平,等.鄱阳湖地区生态系统服务权衡与协同关系的时空格局[J].应用生态学报,2019,30(3):995-1004.
[15] 傅伯杰,于丹丹.生态系统服务权衡与集成方法[J].资源科学,2016,38(1):1-9.
[16] Kragt M E, Robertson M J. Quantifying ecosystem services trade-offs from agricultural practices[J]. Ecological Economics, 2014,102:147-157.
[17] Richards D R, Friess D A. Characterizing coastal ecosystem service trade-offs with future urban development in a tropical city [J]. Environmental Management, 2017,60(5):961-973.
[18] 饶胜,林泉,王夏晖,等.正蓝旗草地生态系统服务权衡研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2015,29(3):81-86.
[19] 葛菁,吴楠,高吉喜,等.不同土地覆被格局情景下多种生态系统服务的响应与权衡:以雅砻江二滩水利枢纽为例[J].生态学报,2012,32(9): 2629 -2639.
[20] 李慧颖.基于遥感和InVEST模型的辽宁省退耕还林工程生态效应评估[D].长春:吉林大学,2019.
[21] Wang Z M, Mao D H, Li L, et al. Quantifying changes in multiple ecosystem services during 1992—2012 in the Sanjiang Plain of China[J]. Science of Total Environment, 2015,514:119-130.
[22] Mao D H, He X Y, Wang Z M, et al. Diverse policies leading to contrasting impacts on land cover and ecosystem services in Northeast China[J]. Journal of Clean Production, 2019,240:117961.
[23] Wischmeier W H, Smith D D. Predicting rainfall erosion losses: A guide to conservation planning [M]. Washington D C: Agricultural Handbook, 1978.
[24] 章文波,付金生.不同类型雨量资料估算降雨侵蚀力[J].资源科学,2003,25(1):35-41.
[25] Williams J R. EPIC:the Erosion-Productivity Impact Calculator[J]. Technical Bulletin-United States Department of Agriculture, 1990,4(4):206-207.
[26] Zhang L W, Fu B J, LüY H, et al. Balancing multiple ecosystem services in conservation priority setting [J]. Landscape Ecology, 2015,30(3):535-546.
[27] 蔡崇法,丁树文,史志华,等.应用USLE模型与地理信息系统IDRISI预测小流域土壤侵蚀量的研究[J].水土保持学报,2000,14(2):19-24.
[28] 蒋春丽,张丽娟,张宏文,等.基于RUSLE模型的黑龙江省2000—2010年土壤保持量评价[J].中国生态农业学报,2015,23(5):642-649.
[29] 袁志芬,黄桂林,莫宏伟,等.四川省宝兴县生态系统生物碳储量动态评估[J].林业资源管理,2014(1):82-88.
[30] 王治良.嫩江流域湿地自然保护区空缺(GAP)分析[D].哈尔滨:中国科学院研究生院(东北地理与农业生态研究所),2016.
[31] Lu N, Sun G, Feng X M, et al. Water yield responses to climate change and variability across the North-South Transect of Eastern China(NSTEC)[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2013,481:96-105.
[32] 王耕,韩冬雪.基于InVEST模型的大凌河上游汇水区水源涵养功能评估[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(3):206-211.
[33] Donohue R, Roderick M, Mcvicar T. Roots, storms and soil pores: Incorporating key ecohydrological processes into Budyko's hydrological model [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2012,436/437:35-50.
[34] Yang H, Yang D, Lei Z, et al. New analytical derivation of the mean annual water-energy balance equation[J]. Water Resources Research, 2008,44(3),893-897.
[35] Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D, et al. Crop Evapotranspiration-Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements-FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No.56 [M]. Rome,Italy:Fao-Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 1998.
[36] 孟庆林.基于生态系统服务变化的长白山地区土地利用/覆被优化研究[D].吉林延边:延边大学,2019.
[37] 李鸿健,任志远,刘焱序,等.西北河谷盆地生态系统服务的权衡与协同分析:以银川盆地为例[J].中国沙漠,2016,36(6):1731-1738.
[38] 潘竟虎,李真.干旱内陆河流域生态系统服务空间权衡与协同作用分析[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(17):280-289.
[39] Wang C, Wang S, Fu B J, et al. Precipitation gradient determines the trade off between soil moisture and soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, and species richness in the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017,575:1538-1545.

相似文献/References:

[1]牟雪洁,王夏晖,张 箫,等.北京市延庆区生态系统生产总值核算及空间化[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(01):265.
　MOU Xuejie,WANG Xiahui,ZHANG Xiao,et al.Accounting and Mapping of Gross Ecosystem Product in Yanqing District, Beijing[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(02):265.
[2]李 龙,吴大放,刘艳艳.国内外土地利用与生态系统服务研究热点与趋势——基于CiteSpace计量分析[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(05):396.
　LI Long,WU Dafang,LIU Yanyan.Hotspots and Trends of the Researches for Land Use and Ecosystem Service-Based on CiteSpace[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(02):396.
[3]李 辉,张晓媛,国洪磊.基于土地利用的三峡库区近30年生态系统服务价值时空变化特征[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(02):309.
　LI Hui,ZHANG Xiaoyuan,GUO Honglei.Spatial and Temporal Changes of Ecosystem Service Value in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area in the Past 30 Years Based on Land Use[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(02):309.
[4]程 静,黄 越.宁夏回族自治区生态系统服务价值时空演变及其驱动力[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(02):382.
　CHENG Jing,HUANG Yue.Spatiotemporal Evolution of Ecosystem Services Value and Its Driving Forces in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(02):382.
[5]苗培培,赵祖军,赵筱青,等.云南典型石漠化区生态系统服务权衡与协同研究[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(04):366.
　MIAO Peipei,ZHAO Zujun,ZHAO Xiaoqing,et al.Study on Trade-off and Cooperation of Ecosystem Service Space in Rocky Desertification Area of Yunnan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(02):366.
[6]裴宏伟,刘孟竹,李雅丽,等.生态修复措施对干旱半干旱地区生态系统服务影响研究——以河北坝上地区为例[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(02):192.
　PEI Hongwei,LIU Mengzhu,LI Yali,et al.Impact of Ecological Restoration Measures on Ecosystem Services in Arid and Semi-arid Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(02):192.
[7]陈 安,李景吉,王茂生,等.西藏“一江两河”流域生态系统服务变化及权衡与协同关系研究[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(02):313.
　CHEN An,LI Jingji,WANG Maosheng,et al.Research for Change of Ecosystem Service and the Tradeoff-Synergy Relation of the YLN Basin in the Tibet Autonomous Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(02):313.
[8]韦绍音,陆汝成,林晓楠,等.基于土地利用转型的广西边境地区生态服务功能交叉敏感性分析[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(03):308.
　WEI Shaoyin,LU Rucheng,LIN Xiaonan,et al.Cross-Sensitivity Analysis of Ecological Service Function in Guangxi Border Region Based on Land Use Transition[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(02):308.
[9]张 斌,李 璐,夏秋月,等.基于土地利用的武汉城市圈生态系统服务权衡/协同分析[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(04):377.
　ZHANG Bin,LI Lu,XIA Qiuyue,et al.Trade off/Synergy Analysis of Ecosystem Services in Wuhan City Circle Based on Land Use[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(02):377.
[10]张师赫,李宝银,林玉英,等.基于生态系统服务的景观生态风险评价及其驱动因素研究——以福建省为例[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(06):174.
　ZHANG Shihe,LI Baoyin,LIN Yuying,et al.Research on Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment and Driving Factors Based on Ecosystem Services[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(02):174.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2020-05-11 修回日期:2020-05-28
资助项目:国家自然科学基金“延龙图地区城市生态用地评价与空间格局优化研究(41461036); 2019年吉林省“十三五”科学技术项目(JJKH20191124KJ); 吉林省科技发展计划项目(20200301014RQ)
第一作者:于媛(1997—),女,吉林白城人,硕士研究生,研究方向为地图学与地理信息系统。E-mail:1466770259@qq.com 通信作者:韩玲(1988—),女,江苏南京人,讲师,在读博士,研究方向:城市地理、城市规划。E-mail:260985592@qq.com

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-02-10