ZHANG Jingxiao,L Wang,WANG Xing,et al.Experimental Study on Characteristics of the Infiltration in the Deep Drying Loess Under Nature Rainfall[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(02):141-148.
深层干化黄土自然降雨入渗特征试验研究
- Title:
- Experimental Study on Characteristics of the Infiltration in the Deep Drying Loess Under Nature Rainfall
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2021)02-0141-08
- Keywords:
- rainfall; soil moisture; depth of infiltration; wetting front; amount of cumulative infiltration
- 分类号:
- S152.7; TV93
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为探讨自然降雨在黄土区干化土壤中的入渗性能,研究干化黄土的降雨入渗机制,在陕北米脂试验站,建立野外10 m大型土柱模拟枣林地深层干化土壤,利用CS650-CR1000土壤水分自动监测系统对2014—2019年的土壤水分状况进行了连续定位监测。结果表明:(1)日降雨量为33.6,35.6 mm的大雨(降雨强度分别为3.73,2.97 mm/h,降雨历时9.0,12.0 h)状况下,最大入渗深度为140,100 cm,累积入渗量达20.05,16.10 mm; 日降雨量为19.0,16.8 mm的中雨(降雨强度分别为2.24,1.53 mm/h,降雨历时8.5,11.0 h)状况下,最大入渗深度为90,60 cm,累积入渗量达8.12,9.77 mm; 日降雨量为9.6,8.8 mm的小雨(降雨强度分别为1.48,0.76 mm/h,降雨历时6.5,11.5 h)状况下,最大入渗深度为30,20 cm,累积入渗量仅为1.05,0.23 mm。(2)降雨入渗的湿润锋运移深度(Zi)随时间(T)呈幂函数Zi=aTb增加。(3)雨水的入渗历时包括降雨历时、自降雨停止至入渗结束两个时段。6次降雨(33.6,35.6,19.0,16.8,9.6,8.8 mm)在降雨停止后时段内的入渗深度分别为100,60,70,40,30,20 cm,入渗量依次为9.86,10.78,2.09,8.42,1.05,0.23 mm。在总入渗历时内,6次降雨入渗补给系数分别为0.60,0.45,0.43,0.58,0.11,0.03。黄土区降雨入渗深度受降雨量、降雨强度、入渗历时影响较大,提高单次降雨的雨量有助于提升雨水入渗补给系数,促进干化土壤得到有效水分修复。
- Abstract:
- In order to explore the capacity of natural rainfall infiltration, and to study the mechanism of rainfall infiltration in the drying soil in the loess area, a field soil column up to 10 m was established to simulate the jujube forests drying soil in Mizhi experimental station which is located in the north of Shaanxi Province. By using the CS650-CR1000 automatic system, changes of soil moisture within different depths were observed continuously under natural conditions during the period 2014—2019. The results were as follows.(1)Under the conditions of heavy rain with daily rainfall of 33.6 mm and 35.6 mm(the rainfall intensities were 3.73 mm/h and 2.97 mm/h, as well, the duration was 9.0 h and 12.0 h, respectively), the maximum infiltration depths were 140 cm and 100 cm, and the cumulative infiltration amounts were up to 20.05 and 16.10 mm, respectively. Under the conditions of moderate rain with daily rainfall of 19.0 mm and 16.8 mm(the rainfall intensities were 2.24 mm/h and 1.53 mm/h, as well, the duration was 8.5 h and 11.0 h, respectively), the maximum infiltration depths were 90 cm and 60 cm, and the cumulative infiltration amounts were up to 8.12 mm and 9.77 mm, respectively. And under the conditions of light rain with daily rainfall of 9.6 mm and 8.8 mm(the rainfall intensities were 1.48 and 0.76 mm/h, as well, the duration was 6.5 h and 11.5 h, respectively), the maximum infiltration depths were 30 cm and 20 cm, and the cumulative infiltration amounts were up to 1.05 mm and 0.23 mm, respectively.(2)The depths of wetting front(Zi)increases with time(T), which follows the power function Zi=aTb.(3)The duration of infiltration includes two stages, namely from the beginning of the rain to the end, and from the cessation of rainfall to the end of infiltration. The infiltration depths of the 6 typical rainfall events(33.6 mm, 35.6 mm, 19.0 mm, 16.8 mm, 9.6 mm, 8.8 mm)were 100 cm, 60 cm, 70 cm, 40 cm, 30 cm, 20 cm in the period from the cessation of rainfall to the end of infiltration, and the infiltration amounts were 9.86 mm, 10.78 mm, 2.09 mm, 8.42 mm, 1.05 mm, and 0.23 mm, respectively. During the duration of infiltration, the coefficients of the 6 rainfall infiltration were 0.60, 0.45, 0.43, 0.58, 0.11 and 0.03. The infiltration depths were greatly affected by precipitation, intensity, and duration of the rainfall in the loess hilly region. Increasing the precipitation of the rainfall was helpful to improve the recharge coefficient and could promote the effective water restoration of dry soil in this region. This study was of great importance to understand the natural restoration ability of the drying soil in the Loess Plateau under the conditions of bare land, and could provide a strong theoretical support for the sustainable utilization of the drying soil.
参考文献/References:
[1] 邵明安,贾小旭,王云强,等.黄土高原土壤干层研究进展与展望[J].地球科学进展,2016,31(1):14-22.
[2] 田璐,张敬晓,高建恩,等.深层干化土壤水分恢复试验研究[J].农业机械学报,2019,50(4):255-262.
[3] 孙剑,李军,王美艳,等.黄土高原半干旱偏旱区苜蓿—粮食轮作土壤水分恢复效应[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(6):33-39.
[4] 孙长忠,黄宝龙,陈海滨,等.黄土高原人工植被与其水分环境相互作用关系研究[J].北京林业大学学报,1998,20(3):10-17.
[5] 王志强,刘宝元,王旭艳,等.黄土丘陵半干旱区人工林迹地土壤水分恢复研究[J].农业工程学报,2007,23(11):77-83.
[6] 赵娇娜,徐学选,李星,等.长武塬区降雨入渗特征[J].中国水土保持科学,2012,10(4):37-44.
[7] 陈洪松,邵明安,王克林.土壤初始含水率对坡面降雨入渗及土壤水分再分布的影响[J].农业工程学报,2006,22(1):44-47.
[8] 杜光波,倪万魁.降雨条件下黄土斜坡的入渗特征分析[J].安全与环境学报,2017,17(4):1387-1391.
[9] 苏敬媛.黄土高原典型流域土壤水分时空变异及其养分特征对不同植被类型的响应[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2019.
[10] 肖婧,王兵.黄土丘陵区不同坡度撂荒草地入渗特征影响因素试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(6):136-142.
[11] 黄俊,金平伟,李敏,等.径流小区尺度土壤入渗率影响因子与估算模型研究[J].农业机械学报,2016,47(8):171-178.
[12] 吴发启,赵西宁,佘雕.坡耕地土壤水分入渗影响因素分析[J].水土保持通报,2003,23(1):16-18.
[13] 白盛元,汪有科,马建鹏,等.黄土高原半干旱区降雨入渗试验研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2016,34(2):218-223.
[14] 雷志栋.土壤水动力学[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1988.
[15] 刘汗,雷廷武,赵军.土壤初始含水率和降雨强度对黏黄土入渗性能的影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2009,7(2):1-6.
[16] 高正夏.新疆玛河流域平原区次降雨入渗补给系数变化规律研究[J].资源环境与工程,2014,28(4):582-586.
[17] 白一茹.黄土丘陵区枣林土壤性质时空特征研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2012.
[18] 汪星,周玉红,汪有科,等.黄土高原半干旱区山地密植枣林土壤水分特性研究[J].水利学报,2015,46(3):263-270.
[19] 郭忠升,邵明安.半干旱区人工林地土壤入渗过程分析[J].土壤学报,2009,46(5):953-958.
[20] 李萍,李同录,王阿丹,等.黄土中水分迁移规律现场试验研究[J].岩土力学,2013,34(5):1331-1339.
[21] Tu X B, Kwong A K L, Dai F C, et al. Field monitoring of rainfall infiltration in a loess slope and analysis of failure mechanism of rainfall-induced landslides[J]. Engineering Geology, 2009,105(1/2):134-150.
相似文献/References:
[1]苏嫄,焦菊英,马祥华.黄土丘陵沟壑区主要群落地上生物量季节变化及其与土壤水分的关系[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):7.
SU Yuan,JIAO Ju-ying,MA Xiang-hua.Seasonal Variation of Aboveground Biomass of Main Plant Communities and Its Relationship with Soil Moisture in the Hill-gully Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(02):7.
[2]许浩,蒋齐,潘占兵,等.黄土丘陵区降雨、土壤水分和苗木成活率的关系[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):202.
XU Hao,JIANG Qi,PAN Zhan-bing,et al.Relationship of Rainfall, Soil Moisture and Seedling Survival Rate in Loess Hilly Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(02):202.
[3]张霞,贾莲莲,李占斌,等.模拟降雨条件下地表糙度动态变化特征研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):16.
ZHANG Xia,JIA Lian-lian,LI Zhan-bin,et al.Study on Dynamical Variation Characteristics of Surface Roughness under Field Simulated Rainfall Condition[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(02):16.
[4]李瑞,李勇,刘云芳.贵州喀斯特地区降雨与坡面土壤侵蚀关系研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(03):7.
LI Rui,LI Yong,LIU Yun-fang.Study of Rainfall and Soil Erosion on Slope in Karst Region of Guizhou Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(02):7.
[5]鲁瑞洁,唐清亮,桑艳礼,等.青海湖克土沙区不同类型沙丘土壤水分的动态变化[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(02):111.
LU Rui-jie,TANG Qing-liang,SANG Yan-li,et al.Dynamic Changes of Soil Moisture in Different Dunes of Ketu Sand Land in Qinghai Lake Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(02):111.
[6]刘士余,章俊霞,罗志军,等.近50年赣西北大坑小流域径流对降雨的响应[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(01):19.
LIU Shi-yu,ZHANG Jun-xia,LUO Zhi-jun,et al.Response of Runoff to Rainfall in Dakeng Small Watershed in Northwestern Jiangxi Province over the Last 50 Years[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(02):19.
[7]吴发启,赵晓光,刘秉正.缓坡耕地降雨、入渗对产流的影响分析[J].水土保持研究,2000,7(01):12.
WU Fa-qi,ZHAO Xiao-guang,LIU Bing-zheng.Analysis of the Effect of Rainfall and Infiltration on Runoff in Gently Sloping Farmland[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2000,7(02):12.
[8]徐学选,穆兴民,蒋定生,等.黄土丘陵区降雨坡面再分配规律研究[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(03):249.
XU Xuexuan,MU Xingmin,JIANG Dingsheng,et al.Study of Rainfall Redistribution on Slope in Loess Hilly Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2002,9(02):249.
[9]方天纵,张贤瑞,刘秀芹.石质丘陵山地水土流失时空变化初步研究[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(02):24.
FANG Tian-zong,ZHANG Xian-rui,LIU Xiu-qin.Study on Spatial and Temporal Variation of Soil and Water Loss in Rock Hilly Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,11(02):24.
[10]李香云,王玉杰,朱金兆.重庆缙云山楠竹林地不同时间尺度降雨量再分配规律研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(06):101.
LI Xiang-yun,WANG Yu-jie,ZHU Jin-zhao.Study on the Rainfall Redistribution of Phyllostachys edulis at Different Time-scale in Chongqing Jinyun Mountain[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(02):101.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2020-03-22 修回日期:2020-04-07
资助项目:国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC0504703); 黄河水利科学研究院基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(HKY-JBYW-2020-30,HKY-JBYW-2018-17)
第一作者:张敬晓(1987—),男,河北衡水人,硕士,讲师,主要从事水资源高效利用研究。E-mail:zhangjingxiao198704@126.com
通信作者:汪星(1984—),男,陕西杨凌人,博士,讲师,主要从事林地耗水研究。E-mail:WangXingSTR@163.com