MENG Yanjun,QIN Peng.Coupling Relationship Between Microbial Community Diversity and Soil Nutrients in Different Wetlands in Coastal Area of Pearl Rive Delta[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(06):77-84.
珠江三角洲滨海湿地土壤微生物群落多样性与养分的耦合关系
- Title:
- Coupling Relationship Between Microbial Community Diversity and Soil Nutrients in Different Wetlands in Coastal Area of Pearl Rive Delta
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2020)06-0077-08
- 分类号:
- S154.3; S158.3
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为了研究珠江三角洲滨海湿地土壤微生物群落多样性与养分的耦合关系,以2015—2018年珠江三角洲滨海红树林湿地、芦苇湿地、碱蓬湿地和互花米草湿地为对象,采用野外观测和室内分析相结合的方法研究了滨海湿地不同植物群落土壤微生物群落多样性和土壤养分含量。结果表明:土壤pH值基本表现为,互花米草湿地>碱蓬滩湿地>芦苇湿地>红树林湿地,其中不同湿地植物群落土壤pH值差异均不显著(p>0.05); 土壤有机碳、全氮、全钾基本表现为互花米草湿地<碱蓬滩湿地<芦苇湿地<红树林湿地。滨海湿地不同植物群落土壤细菌数量占绝对优势,占微生物总数的70%左右。土壤微生物总数、真菌数目和放线菌数目均表现为互花米草湿地<碱蓬滩湿地<芦苇湿地<红树林湿地,其中不同湿地差异均显著(p<0.05)。土壤微生物量碳、氮、磷基本表现为互花米草湿地<碱蓬滩湿地<芦苇湿地<红树林湿地,其中微生物量碳、氮不同湿地差异均显著(p<0.05); 不同湿地微生物量磷差异均不显著(p>0.05)。土壤微生物群落的物种丰富度指数(H)、均匀度指数(E)、优势度指数(Ds)和碳源利用丰富度指数(S)基本表现为互花米草湿地<碱蓬滩湿地<芦苇湿地<红树林湿地,其中优势度指数(Ds)差异均不显著(p>0.05)。相关性分析显示,土壤养分和pH值与微生物群落功能多样性密切相关,其中pH值和土壤养分是滨海湿地不同植物群落土壤微生物群落多样性差异的重要影响因素。此外,土壤养分与微生物数量及微生物量关系密切,在生态保护和评估等研究过程中应充分考虑滨海湿地下的土壤微生物和养分的变化特征及耦合关系。
- Abstract:
- In order to study the variation of soil microbial community diversity and its influencing factors in coastal wetlands from 2015 to 2018, mangrove wetland, reed wetland, salicornia wetland and mutual flower rice grass wetland were selected to explore soil microbial community diversity and its influencing factors. The results showed that the basic pH value of soil decreased in the order: Spartina alterniflora wetland>Suaeda glaucawetland>Phragmites communis wetland>Rhizophora apiculata wetland, and there was no significant difference in soil pH value between different wetland plant communities (p>0.05); soil organic carbon, total nitrogen and total potassium increased in the order: Spartina alterniflora<Suaeda glauca wetland<Phragmites communis wetland<Rhizophora apiculata wetland; the number of soil bacteria in different plant communities in coastal wetlands was absolutely dominant, accounting for about 70% of the total number of microorganisms, followed by actinomycetes, with the least fungi; the total number of soil microorganisms, fungi and actinomycetes increased in the order, the wetland of Spartina alterniflora<Suaeda glauca wetland<Phragmites communis wetland<mangrove wetland, among which the difference among different wetlands was significant (p<0.05); the soil microbial biomass of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus increased in the order, Spartina alterniflora<Suaeda glauca wetland<Phragmites communis wetland<Rhizophora apiculata wetland, among which soil microbial biomass of carbon and nitrogen was significantly different in different wetlands (p<0.05); the difference of microbial biomass phosphorus in different wetlands was not significant (p>0.05); the species richness index(H), evenness index(E), dominance index(Ds)and carbon source utilization richness index(S)of soil microbial community increased in the order, Spartina alterniflora<Suaeda glauca wetland<Phragmites communis wetland<Rhizophora apiculata wetland, among which the dominance index(Ds)was not significantly different (p>0.05). Correlation analysis showed that soil nutrients and pH value was closely related to the microbial community functional diversity, including negative contribution of pH value to soil microbial community functional diversity and positive contribution of soil nutrients to soil microbial community functional diversity, soil pH value and nutrients were the important influence factors on soil microbial community diversity in different plant communities of coastal wetlands. Soil nutrients were closely related to microbial quantity and microbial biomass, and their contents greatly affected microbial quantity and activity. In the process of ecological protection and evaluation, the change characteristics and coupling relationships of soil microorganisms and nutrients under coastal wetlands should be fully considered.
参考文献/References:
[1] 王鹏,祝丽香,陈香香,等.桔梗与大葱间作对土壤养分,微生物区系和酶活性的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2018,2(3):668-675.
[2] 陈丹梅,陈晓明,梁永江,等.轮作对土壤养分,微生物活性及细菌群落结构的影响[J].草业学报,2015,24(12):56-65.
[3] 付美云,杨宁,杨满元,等.衡阳紫色土丘陵坡地不同恢复阶段土壤微生物与养分的耦合关系[J].生态环境学报,2015,24(1):41-48.
[4] 李明,李忠佩,刘明,等.不同秸秆生物炭对红壤性水稻土养分及微生物群落结构的影响[J].中国农业科学,2015,48(7):1361-1369.
[5] 肖烨,黄志刚,武海涛,等.三江平原典型湿地类型土壤微生物特征与土壤养分的研究[J].环境科学,2015,36(5):1842-1848.
[6] 董亮,田慎重,王学君,等.秸秆还田对土壤养分及土壤微生物数量的影响[J].中国农学通报,2017,3(11):77-80.
[7] 唐海龙,龚伟,王景燕,等.水肥处理对竹叶花椒土壤养分和微生物的影响[J].浙江农林大学学报,2019,36(2):318-325.
[8] 杨阳,刘秉儒.荒漠草原不同植物根际与非根际土壤养分及微生物量分布特征[J].生态学报,2015,35(22):7562-7570.
[9] 李艳梅,陈奇伯,梁茂,等.干热河谷水电建设干扰对表土层土壤养分及微生物的影响[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(1):147-152.
[10] 张丹,刘宏斌,马忠明,等.残膜对农田土壤养分含量及微生物特征的影响[J].中国农业科学,2017,50(2):310-319.
[11] 王润莲,张志栋,刘景辉,等.免耕留茬覆盖对旱作燕麦土壤养分及微生物量的影响[J].水土保持学报,2016,3(4):183-187.
[12] 张璐,阎海涛,任天宝,等.有机物料对植烟土壤养分、酶活性和微生物群落功能多样性的影响[J].中国烟草学报,2019,25(2):55-62.
[13] 唐偲頔,郭剑芬,张政,等.增温和隔离降雨对杉木幼林土壤养分和微生物生物量的影响[J].亚热带资源与环境学报,2017,12(1):40-45.
[14] 张耸,李莉,马一琼,等.不同类型植烟土壤养分含量、微生物数量与酶活性研究[J].中国农学通报,2016,32(35):105-110.
[15] 樊俊,谭军,王瑞,等.秸秆还田和腐熟有机肥对植烟土壤养分、酶活性及微生物多样性的影响[J].烟草科技,2019,52(2):12-18.
[16] 栗丽,李廷亮,孟会生,等.菌剂与肥料配施对矿区复垦土壤养分及微生物学特性的影响[J].应用与环境生物学报,2016,22(6):1156-1160.
[17] 符鲜,杨树青,刘德平,等.套作小麦/玉米不同施氮水平对土壤养分与微生物数量的影响[J].干旱区研究,2017,3(1):43-50.
[18] 丁红利,吴先勤,张磊.秸秆覆盖下土壤养分与微生物群落关系研究[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(2):294-300.
[19] 高海宁,李彩霞,孙小妹,等.黑河上游冰沟流域土壤养分与微生物空间异质性研究[J].草业学报,2018,27(6):23-33.
[20] 孟阿静,严晶,顾成刚,等.增温水灌溉对棉花根际土壤养分和土壤微生物数量的影响[J].新疆农业科学,2017,54(2):336-342.
[21] 张凯,郑华,陈法霖,等.桉树取代马尾松对土壤养分和酶活性的影响[J].土壤学报,2015,52(3):646-653.
[22] 仲波,孙庚,程魏,等.汶川地震对森林土壤养分动态的影响[J].应用与环境生物学报,2016,22(5):773-779.
[23] 魏佳宁,马红梅,邵新庆,等.三江源区土壤微生物和土壤养分空间分布特性研究[J].中国土壤与肥料,2016,6(2):27-31.
[24] 顾美英,唐光木,葛春辉,等.不同秸秆还田方式对和田风沙土土壤微生物多样性的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2016,24(4):489-498.
相似文献/References:
[1]闫德仁,张胜男,黄海广,等.沙漠苔藓植物分解的土壤改良效应[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(03):225.
YAN Deren,ZHANG Shengnan,HUANG Haiguang,et al.Effect of Decomposition of Desert Moss Crust Plant on Soil Improvement[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(06):225.
[2]柴成武,王理德,尉秋实,等.民勤青土湖区不同年限退耕地土壤颗粒组成和养分变化特征[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(04):99.
CHAI Chengwu,WANG Lide,YU Qiushi,et al.Change Characteristics of Soil Particle Composition and Nutrient of Abandoned Farmland in Different Years in Qingtu Lake Area in Minqin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(06):99.
[3]丁 丽,冀玉良,李 懿.不同林龄油松根际土壤微生物群落多样性及其影响因子[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(04):184.
Ding Li,JI Yuliang,LI Yi.Soil Microbial Diversity and Its Influencing Factors in Rhizosphere and Non-Rhizosphere in the Stands of Pinus tabuliformis with Different Ages in Minjiang River Valley[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(06):184.
[4]柴成武,王理德,尉秋实,等.民勤青土湖区不同年限退耕地土壤水分和养分变化[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(05):101.
CHAI Chengwu,WANG Lide,WEI Qiushi,et al.Soil Moisture and Nutrient Changes in Different Years of Abandoned Farmlands in Qingtu District[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(06):101.
[5]李 懿,杨子松.岷江流域不同土地利用方式下的土壤微生物特征及其与土壤养分的关系[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(01):33.
LI Yi,YANG Zisong.Soil Nutrients and Soil Microbial Characteristics and Their Relationships Under Different Land Use Types in Minjiang River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(06):33.
[6]杨一凡,吴发启,段红腾,等.青海主要枸杞产区不同耕作措施对灰棕漠土理化性质影响及肥力综合评价[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(02):1.
YANG Yifan,WU Faqi,DUAN Hongteng,et al.Effects of Different Tillage Measures on Physical and Chemical Properties of Gray Brown Desert Soil and Comprehensive Evaluation of Fertility in Major Wolfberry Production Areas of Qinghai[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(06):1.
[7]伏文兵,严友进,王 凯,等.喀斯特石漠化区治理措施对土壤质量演变的影响[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(02):27.
FU Wenbing,YAN Youjin,WANG Kai,et al.Effects of Control Measures on Soil Quality Evolution in the Karst Rocky Desertification Area in Southwestern China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(06):27.
[8]邵发琦,李改民,柯 斧,等.肥水蚓坑措施下不同施肥对土壤养分和山地苹果生产的影响[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(01):197.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.01.031]
SHAO Faqi,LI Gaimin,KE Fu,et al.The Effect of Different Fertilization on Soil Nutrient and Mountain Apple Production Under the Fertilizer Water Earthworm Pit Measures[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(06):197.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.01.031]
[9]赵满兴,杨 帆,马文全,等.黄土丘陵区沙棘人工林土壤养分及酶活性季节变化[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(02):58.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.02.032]
ZHAO Manxing,YANG Fan,MA Wenquan,et al.Seasonal Change of Soil Nutrient and Enzyme Activities in Hippophae rhamnoides Plantation with Different Stand Ages in Loess Hilly Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(06):58.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.02.032]
[10]陈佳钰,李永梅,廖学圆,等.基施缓释肥等氮替代化肥对径流氮素流失和青贮玉米生长的影响[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(03):188.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.03.035]
CHEN Jiayu,LI Yongmei,LIAO Xueyuan,et al.Effects of Base Application Slow-Release Fertilizer Substituting Nitrogen Fertilizers on Nitrogen Loss Along with Runoff and Silage Maize Growth[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(06):188.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.03.035]
[11]张爱娣,郑仰雄,吴碧珊,等.滨海湿地土壤微生物群落多样性及其影响因素[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(03):8.
ZHANG Aidi,ZHENG Yangxiong,WU Bishan,et al.Soil Microbial Community Diversity and Its Influencing Factors in Coastal Wetland[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(06):8.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2019-12-11 修回日期:2019-12-30
资助项目:国家社会科学基金“滇桂黔民族地区乡村旅游精准扶贫效果评估及长效机制构建研究”(17BMZ094)
第一作者:孟妍君(1977—),女,山东宁津人,硕士,副教授,高级工程师,主要从事景观规划与生态修复研究。E-mail:Yanjun_meng@126.com
通信作者:秦鹏(1977—),男,广西桂林人,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事景观规划设计研究。E-mail:422929109@qq.com