[1]朱晓南,刘艳中,陈 勇,等.武汉市城市用地扩张对生态系统服务的时空影响[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(05):288-294.
　ZHU Xiaonan,Liu Yanzhong,Chenyong,et al.Effect of Urban Land Expansion on Spatiotemporal Ecosystem Service in Wuhan[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(05):288-294.
点击复制

武汉市城市用地扩张对生态系统服务的时空影响

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 27 期数: 2020年05期 页码: 288-294 栏目: 目次 出版日期: 2020-08-20
Title:
Effect of Urban Land Expansion on Spatiotemporal Ecosystem Service in Wuhan
文章编号:
1005-3409(2020)05-0288-07
作者:
朱晓南1,2, 刘艳中1, 陈 勇1,2, 张 祚3, 宋改凤1,2
(1.武汉科技大学 资源与环境工程学院, 武汉 430081; 2.冶金矿产资源高效利用与造块湖北省重点实验室, 武汉 430081; 3.华中师范大学 公共管理学院, 武汉 430079)
Author(s):
ZHU Xiaonan,2, Liu Yanzhong1, Chenyong1,2, ZHANG Zuo3, SONG Gaifeng1,2
(1.School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, China; 2.Hubei Key Laboratory of High-Efficiency Utilization and Agglomeration of Metallurgical mineral Resources, Wuhan 430081, China; 3.College of Public Administration, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China)
关键词:
生态系统服务;  城市用地扩张;  时空影响分析;  武汉市
Keywords:
ecosystem service value;  urban expansion;  spatial analysis;  regression analysis;  Wuhan City
分类号:
F301.2; X171
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
针对城市用地扩张对生态系统服务影响研究缺乏空间影响因素(坡度、高程、梯次)的分析,而导致无法以改变城市用地扩张的空间分布来减少ES损失的问题,以武汉市为例,定量计算区域各生态系统服务功能价值及城市用地扩张的时空变化特征,探究了城市用地扩张对生态系统服务的时空影响特征。结果表明:武汉市ESV高值和极低值区域在武汉市中部交错分布,受城市用地扩张影响最高,ESV极低值区域不断扩大,逐渐扩散至西部和东部区域; 近25年来,城市用地扩张面积不断增加,在1990—2005年扩张速度较为稳定,在2005—2015年扩张速度迅速增加。研究认为武汉市城市用地扩张面积对各生态系统服务功能均起主要影响作用,城市扩张侵占地类变化起次要影响作用,扩张高程影响程度较大,扩张距离影响程度较低,扩张坡度仅影响食物生产和保持土壤。武汉市在未来的城市用地扩张中,应控制中心城区的范围,在距市中心较远的地区建立新的卫星城。
Abstract:
In view of the problem that the loss of ecosystem service cannot be reduced by changing the spatial distribution of urban land expansion, because the study on the influence of urban land expansion on ecosystem services lacks of spatial factors(slope, elevation and echelon), we selected Wuhan as a case example to calculate the value of important ecosystem services and the temporal and spatial variation characteristics of urban land expansion, and explore the spatial and temporal influence feature of urban land expansion on ecosystem services. The results were as follows. The regions with high ecosystem service value(ESV)or low ESV staggered in the central part of Wuhan, which was most affected by urban land expansion, and the area with extremely low value of ESV was expanding and gradually spreading to the western and eastern regions. In the past 25 years, the area of urban land expansion had continued to increase. In the period 1990—2005, the urban land expansion rate was relatively stable. In the period 2005—2015, the urban land expansion rate increased rapidly. It can be seen that the urban expansion area has played a major role in the ecosystem service. Urban expansion category has a secondary impact. The degree of expansion elevation has a greater impact, and the degree of expansion has a lower degree of influence. The degree of expansion elevation is greater, and the degree of expansion distance is less affected. The expansion slope only affects food production and soil conservation. In the future expansion of urban land use in Wuhan, the scope of the central urban area should be controlled and new satellite cities should be built in the area far from the city center.

参考文献/References:

[1]Costanza R, d'Arge R, De Groot R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997,387(6630):253-260.
[2]Daily G C. Nature's services[M]. Washington DC:Island Press, 1997.
[3]Bryan B A, Ye Y, Connor J D. Land-use change impacts on ecosystem services value:Incorporating the scarcity effects of supply and demand dynamics[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2018,32:144-157.
[4]Song W, Deng X. Land-use/land-cover change and ecosystem service provision in China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017,576:705-719.
[5]郭椿阳,高尚,周伯燕,等.基于格网的伏牛山区土地利用变化对生态服务价值影响研究[J].生态学报,2019,39(10):3482-3493.
[6]张丽琴,渠丽萍,吕春艳,等.基于空间格局视角的武汉市土地生态系统服务价值研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2018,27(9):1988-1997.
[7]Vigl L E, Tasser E, Schirpke U, et al. Using land use/land cover trajectories to uncover ecosystem service patterns across the Alps[J]. Regional Environmental Change, 2017,17(8):2237-2250.
[8]Arowolo A O, Deng X, Olatunji O A, et al. Assessing changes in the value of ecosystem services in response to land-use/land-cover dynamics in Nigeria[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018,636:597-609.
[9]刘晓,张学霞,徐新良,等.河北坝上土地利用变化对生态服务价值的影响[J].北京林业大学学报,2019,41(8):94-104.
[10]张志强,陈鹏飞,申维.长武县土地利用/覆被演变规律及其影响下生态服务价值变化研究[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(4):219-226.
[11]王宽,蔡正华,齐增湘,等.2000—2013年衡阳市土地利用格局转变对生态系统服务的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2017,25(7):1060-1070.
[12]Yi H, Güneralp B, Filippi A M, et al. Impacts of land change on ecosystem services in the San Antonio River Basin, Texas, from 1984 to 2010[J]. Ecological Economics, 2017,135:125-135.
[13]Fu Q, Li B, Hou Y, et al. Effects of land use and climate change on ecosystem services in Central Asia's arid regions:a case study in Altay Prefecture, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017,607:633-646.
[14]邵小云,张则飞,刘中,等.土地利用变化及规划结构对海岛生态系统服务价值的影响:以舟山市普陀区为例[J].生态学杂志,2018,37(2):514-522.
[15]虎陈霞,郭旭东,连纲,等.长三角快速城市化地区土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响:以嘉兴市为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2017,26(3):333-340.
[16]王雅,蒙吉军.黑河中游土地利用变化对生态系统服务的影响[J].干旱区研究,2017,34(1):200-207.
[17]孟悦.宁波市城市化发展对区域生态系统服务价值的影响[J].地域研究与开发,2016,35(6):81-86.
[18]刘亚茹,王聪,严力蛟,等.华北平原农区土地利用变化对生态系统服务的影响:以河南省商丘市为例[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(5):1597-1606.
[19]荣益,李超,许策,等.城镇化过程中生态系统服务价值变化及人类活动影响的空间分异:以黄骅市为例[J].生态学杂志,2017,36(5):1374-1381.
[20]欧阳晓,朱翔,贺清云.城市化与生态系统服务的空间交互关系研究:以长株潭城市群为例[J].生态学报,2019,39(20):7502-7513.
[21]姚小薇,曾杰,李旺君.武汉城市圈城镇化与土地生态系统服务价值空间相关特征[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(9):249-256.
[22]童陆亿,胡守庚.中国主要城市建设用地扩张特征[J].资源科学,2016,38(1):0050-0061.
[23]张永利,王晖,王留林,等.武汉市水土流失现状及综合治理对策[J].中国水土保持,2015(8):42-44.
[24]曾忠平,彭浩轩.城市湿地损失和内涝灾害响应的遥感分析:以武汉市南湖为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2018,27(4):929-938.
[25]潘鹤思,李英,陈振环.森林生态系统服务价值评估方法研究综述及展望[J].干旱区资源与环境,2018,32(6):72-78.
[26]刘海,武靖,陈晓玲.丹江口水源区生态系统服务时空变化及权衡协同关系研究[J].生态学报,2018,38(13):4609-4624.
[27]李双成,谢爱丽,吕春艳,等.土地生态系统服务研究进展及趋势展望[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(12):82-89.
[28]谢高地,甄霖,鲁春霞,等.一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J].自然资源学报,2008,23(5):911-919.
[29]谢高地,鲁春霞,冷允法,等.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(2):189-196.
[30]赵育恒,曾晨.武汉城市圈生态服务价值时空演变分析及影响因素[J].生态学报,2019,39(4):1426-1440.
[31]王航,秦奋,朱筠,等.土地利用及景观格局演变对生态系统服务价值的影响[J].生态学报,2017,37(4):1286-1296.
[32]魏圆云,崔丽娟,张曼胤,等.基于生态系统服务价值的湿地恢复工程效益分析:以北京市延庆县蔡家河为例[J].生态学报,2015,35(13):4287-4294.
[33]高原,何青松,张梦珂.城市用地扩张与景观生态安全关联规律挖掘:以武汉市为例[J].测绘与空间地理信息,2016,39(9):5-9.
[34]李俊翰,高明秀.滨州市生态系统服务价值与生态风险时空演变及其关联性[J].生态学报,2018,39(21):7815-7828.
[35]张瑜,赵晓丽,左丽君,等.黄土高原土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响[J].国土资源遥感,2019,31(3):132-139.
[36]沈满洪,毛狄.海洋生态系统服务价值评估研究综述[J].生态学报,2019,39(6):2255-2265.
[37]王玲慧,张代青,李凯娟.河流生态系统服务价值评价综述[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2015,25(5):10-14.

相似文献/References:

[1]梁春玲,谷胜利.南四湖湿地生态系统能值分析与区域发展[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(02):185.
　LIANG Chun-ling,GU Sheng-li.Analysis on Energy Value of Wetland Ecosystem of Nansi Lake in Shandong Province of China and Regional Development[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):185.
[2]王伟林,黄贤金,钟太洋.区域土地利用变化的生态系统服务价值响应——以南京市为例[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(01):212.
　WANG Wei-lin,HUANG Xian-jin,ZHONG Tai-yang.Area Land Use Change Responses to the Ecosystem Service Value—A Case Study of Nanjing City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(05):212.
[3]陈晓林,杨忠,熊东红,等.昌都地区生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(01):156.
　CHEN Xiao-lin,YANG Zhong,XIONG Dong-hong,et al.The Valuation of Ecosystem Services in Changdu, Tibet[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(05):156.
[4]郭兵,姜琳,孙彩红,等.基于多源数据的岷江上游生态系统服务价值动态评估[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(06):131.
　GUO Bing,JIANG Lin,SUN Caihong,et al.Dynamic Evaluation on Ecosystem Service Value of the Upper Reaches of Minjiang River Based on Multi-Source Data[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(05):131.
[5]吴丹,邵全琴,刘纪远,等.中国草地生态系统水源涵养服务时空变化[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(05):256.
　WU Dan,SHAO Quanqin,LIU Jiyuan,et al.Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Water Regulation Service of Grassland Ecosystem in China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(05):256.
[6]阿依努尔·艾尼,玉米提·哈力克,塔依尔江·艾山,等.利益相关者对塔里木河下游荒漠河岸林生态系统服务的认知度分析[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(01):205.
　Ayinuer·Aini,Umut·Halik,Tayierjiang·Aishan,et al.Analysis of Stakeholders’ Cognition on Desert Riparian Forest Ecosystem Services in the Lower Reaches of Tarim River, China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(05):205.
[7]杜国明,孙晓兵,刘彦随.延安市退耕对生态的影响及其人文驱动因素分析[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(03):233.
　DU Guoming,SUN Xiaobing,LIU Yansui.Analysis of Ecological Restoration on Ecosystem Services and Its Human Driving Factors in Yan’an City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(05):233.
[8]王敏,阮俊杰,姚佳,等.基于InVEST模型的生态系统土壤保持功能研究——以福建宁德为例[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(04):184.
　WANG Min,RUAN Jun-jie,YAO Jia,et al.Study on Soil Conservation Service of Ecosystem Based on InVEST Model—A Case Study of Ningde City, Fujian Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(05):184.
[9]周涛,李天宏.陕西省退耕还林(草)前后LUCC对生态系统服务的影响[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(01):246.
　ZHOU Tao,LI Tian-hong.Influence of Land Use/Cover Changes on Ecosystem Services in Shaanxi Province before and after Returning Farmland to Forest/Grass[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(05):246.
[10]牛志君,周亚鹏,王树涛,等.县域土地利用变化对碳储量的影响与评价——以黑龙港流域巨鹿县为例[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(03):292.
　NIU Zhijun,ZHOU Yapeng,WANG Shutao,et al.Influence and Evaluation of Land Use Change on Carbon Storage on County Scale—A Case Study of Julu County in Heilonggang Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(05):292.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2019-11-08修回日期:2019-11-18
资助项目:国家自然科学基金“矿区重金属污染农地农户利用行为机理与风险管控:以大冶市典型矿区为例”(41971237); 国家自然科学基金“基于互联网搜索的住房价格公众关注度:城际网络特征与内在机理”(71774066)
第一作者:朱晓南(1995—),男,湖北十堰人,硕士研究生,主要从事土地资源和生态环境安全.E-mail:1102014634@qq.com
通信作者:刘艳中(1979—),男,山西吕梁人,博士,教授,主要从资源环境与区域可持续发展等研究.E-mail:Liuyanzhong@wust.edu.cn

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-08-25