XIE Mengyao,REN Zongping,Li Zhanbin,et al.Characteristics of Runoff and Sediment Yield During Flood Events in a Small Watershed of the Pisha Sandstone Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(05):45-49,58.
砒砂岩区小流域场次洪水产流产沙特征
- Title:
- Characteristics of Runoff and Sediment Yield During Flood Events in a Small Watershed of the Pisha Sandstone Area
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2020)05-0045-05
- Keywords:
- Flood events; runoff and sediment yield; sedimentary cycle; grain size distribution; Weibull distribution
- 分类号:
- P333
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 我国砒砂岩区属于多营力复合侵蚀区,其中水力侵蚀是各侵蚀物质输移的主要载体。选取位于裸露砒砂岩剧烈侵蚀区的二老虎沟小流域为研究区探讨砒砂岩区小流域场次洪水产流产沙特征,细化区域水蚀过程。2018年8月采集了小流域两层泥沙沉积旋回样及对应的侵蚀物质来源,结合泥沙沉积旋回样对应的降水、径流、泥沙数据进行了分析。以洪峰所在时间将两次洪水事件命名为20180716(1号)和20180719(2号)。结果表明:流域雨前土壤含水量及雨型差异是决定流域产流开始时间和初损量的主因。1号洪水径流量、输沙量分别为2号洪水对应的该值的2.7倍及3.4倍。粉粒、中砂粒、细砂粒为二老虎沟小流域坝地沉积旋回样的主要粒径,占比达70%。两场次洪条件下小流域泥沙淤积状况存在差异,与1号洪水的沉积旋回样相比,2号洪水的沉积旋回样粒径粗化。黏粒、粉粒、极细砂粒占比减少,细砂粒、中砂粒、粗砂粒的含量增加。利用Weibull分布拟合了二老虎坝地泥沙沉积旋回主要物质来源(地表覆土及裸露砒砂岩)的理论分布曲线,在此基础上根据最小二乘准采用差分进化算法求得沉积旋回层的物质来源比例,结果显示砒砂岩为两场洪水沉积旋回样中的主要侵蚀运移物质。
- Abstract:
- The Pisha Sandstone area in China is an erosion zone affected by multiple forces, with water erosion being the main erosion force as well as the transport carrier of erosion materials. In order to better understand the processes pertaining to regional water erosion in a region of intense erosion made of Pisha sandstone and frequently affected by floods, an analysis of the characteristics of the runoff and sediment yield in the Erlaohugou watershed was conducted during flood events in this study. In August 2018, we carried out sampling of erosion materials and two sedimentary cycles in the region. The precipitation, runoff and sediment data corresponding to sedimentary cycles were analyzed. Hereafter, the flood which the flood peak the 20180716 was chosen as the reference as NO.1, and the flood which the flood peak 20180719 was chosen as NO.2. The initial soil water content and the pattern of rainfalls are the two main factors that determine the starting time and the initial loss of the runoff. The runoff and sediment transport of NO.1 are 2.7 times and 3.4 times of the value corresponding to NO.2, respectively. The types of dominant sediment in the sedimentary cycles are medium sand, fine sand and silt, accounting for 70%. The siltation in the basin changed depending on changes of the flood conditions. Compared with the sedimentary cycle of NO.1, the particle size of the sedimentary cycle of flood NO.2 is coarsened. The proportion of clay, silt and extremely fine sand decreased, while the content of fine sand, medium sand and coarse sand increased. This study also considered the use of the Weibull distribution to establish theoretical distribution curve of the particle size distribution of the erosion materials(surface soil and bare Pisha Sandstone)in the Erlaohugou watershed. On the basis of this, the proportion of erosion materials in the sedimentary cycles is obtained by differential evolution according to the least square criterion, and it is found that Pisha Sandstones are the main erosion materials in the sedimentary cycles.
参考文献/References:
[1]王愿昌,吴永红,寇权,等.砒砂岩分布范围界定与类型区划分[J].中国水土保持科学,2007,5(1):14-18.
[2]Yang F S, Cao M M, Li H E, et al. Simulation of sediment retention effects of the single seabuckthorn flexible dam in the Pisha Sandstone area[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2013,52:228-237.
[3]Zhen Q, Zheng J, He H, et al. Effects of Pisha sandstone content on solute transport in a sandy soil[J]. Chemosphere, 2016,144:2214-2220.
[4]Yang F S, Bi C F, Cao M M, et al. Simulation of sediment retention effects of the double seabuckthorn plant flexible dams in the Pisha Sandstone area of China[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2014,71:21-31.
[5]许炯心.“十大孔兑”侵蚀产沙与风水两相作用及高含沙水流的关系[J].泥沙研究,2013(6):28-37.
[6]姚文艺,李长明,张攀,等.砒砂岩侵蚀机理研究与展望[J].人民黄河,2018,40(6):1-7.
[7]任宗萍,谢梦瑶,马勇勇,等.乌兰木伦河1960—2015年水沙周期性分析[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(6):78-82,97.
[8]慕星,张晓明.皇甫川流域水沙变化及驱动因素分析[J].干旱区研究,2013,30(5):933-939.
[9]苏涛,张兴昌,王仁君,等.植被覆盖对砒砂岩地区边坡侵蚀的减流减沙效益[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(3):98-101.
[10]杨方社,曹明明,李怀恩,等.沙棘柔性坝影响下砒砂岩沟道土壤水分空间变异分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2013,27(7):161-167.
[11]谢毅文,李怀恩,李越,等.砒砂岩区植物拦沙作用导致泥沙筛分效应研究[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(6):22-25.
[12]张传才,秦奋,汪永新,等.流域地貌形态多尺度三维分形量化及尺度效应:以砒砂岩区二老虎沟为例[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(1):278-283.
[13]张传才,秦奋,张喜旺,等.水沙物理模型CASC2D-SED的DEM尺度效应发生机制[J].水文,2018,38(2):15-24.
[14]谢悦波.水信息技术[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2009.
[15]巫尚蔚,杨春和,张超,等.基于Weibull模型的细粒尾矿粒径分布[J].重庆大学学报,2016,39(3):1-12.
相似文献/References:
[1]田 培,仇浩然,冯 宇,等.雨强和坡度对红壤坡面产流产沙及侵蚀动力过程影响[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(06):1.
TIAN Pei,QIU Haoran,FENG Yu,et al.Effects of Rainfall Intensity and Slope Gradient on Runoff and Sediment Production and Erosion Dynamic Process on Red Soil Slope[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(05):1.
[2]刘鸿涛,李起龙,韩 宇,等.PAM对寒区粉壤土堤防护坡产流产沙特征的影响[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(06):14.
LIU Hongtao,LI Qilong,HAN Yu,et al.Effect of PAM on the Characteristics of Runoff and Sediment Yield in Protection Slope of Embankment of Silty Loam in Cold Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(05):14.
[3]苏远逸,李 鹏,任宗萍,等.坡度对黄土坡面产流产沙过程及水沙关系的影响[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(02):118.
SU Yuanyi,LI Peng,REN Zongping,et al.Effect of Slope Gradient on the Process of Runoff and Sediment Yield and Water-Sediment Relation on the Loess Slope[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(05):118.
[4]田秀民,马春霞,鲁旭东,等.微地形重塑对大型排土场平台水沙及植被的影响[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(03):74.
TIAN Xiumin,MA Chunxia,LU Xudong,et al.Impact of Microtopographic Reconstruction on Runoff and Sediment Yield and Vegetation of Large Waste Dump Platform[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(05):74.
[5]李智勇,张梦杰,陈明玉,等.苜蓿对坡面产流产沙及土壤水分的影响[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(05):54.
LI Zhiyong,ZHANG Mengjie,CHEN Mingyu,et al.Effects of Alfalfa(Medicago sativa L.)on Runoff and Sediment Yield and Soil Moisture on Slope[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(05):54.
[6]孙义秋,关颖慧,汪志荣,等.植被毯措施对黑土农田浅沟侵蚀的防护效果研究[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(01):8.
SUN Yiqiu,GUAN Yinghui,WANG Zhirong,et al.Study on the Protective Effect of Vegetation Blanket on Ephemeral Gullies in Black Soil Farmland[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(05):8.
[7]乔殿新,冯 伟,王 飞,等.台风“利奇马”暴雨引发的流域产流产沙特征——以山东省临朐县为例[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(02):31.
QIAO Dianxin,FENG Wei,WANG Fei,et al.Characteristics of Runoff and Sediment Yield of Typhoon ‘Lekima' Rainstorm[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(05):31.
[8]朱志卓,李 龙,张 鹏,等.水力侵蚀下砒砂岩区植被格局对微地形和侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(03):10.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.03.040]
ZHU Zhizhuo,LI Long,ZHANG Peng,et al.Influence of Vegetation Pattern on Microtopography and Erosion Under Hydraulic Erosion in Feldspathic Sandstone Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(05):10.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.03.040]
[9]何伟鹏,胡夏嵩,刘昌义,等.不同植物对黄土边坡产流产沙与抗剪强度的影响[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(04):18.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.04.046.]
HE Weipeng,HU Xiasong,LIU Changyi,et al.Effects of Different Plants on Runoff and Sediment Yield and Shear Strength of Loess Slope[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(05):18.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.04.046.]
[10]敖利满,蒋超华,徐勤学,等.岩面形态对西南喀斯特坡地产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(05):52.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.05.005.]
AO Liman,JIANG Chaohua,XU Qinxue,et al.Influence of Rock Surface Morphology on Runoff and Sediment in Karst Slope of Southwest China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(05):52.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.05.005.]
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2019-06-10修回日期:2019-11-26
资助项目:国家重点研发计划(2017YFC0504501); 国家自然科学基金(51879281,51779204)
第一作者:谢梦瑶(1996—),女,陕西三原人,硕士研究生,主要从事流域水沙演变研究.E-mail:xiemengyao000@163.com
通信作者:任宗萍(1982—),女,山东潍坊人,博士,副教授,主要从事流域水沙过程研究.E-mail:renzongping@163.com