YANG Xin,WANG Keqin,SONG Yali,et al.Characteristics of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Losses Under Different Land-use Types in Red Soil Hilly Area in Central Yunnan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(03):23-29.
滇中红壤丘陵区不同土地利用类型坡地氮磷流失特征
- Title:
- Characteristics of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Losses Under Different Land-use Types in Red Soil Hilly Area in Central Yunnan Province
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2020)03-0023-07
- 分类号:
- S157.1
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为揭示红壤丘陵区不同土地利用类型坡地径流及氮磷流失特征,以滇中仓房小流域3种土地利用类型(林地、灌草地、农地)为研究对象,通过测定2018年雨季自然降雨过程中不同土地利用类型径流量、氮磷流失形态、质量浓度及流失量,研究了红壤丘陵区径流及氮磷流失特征。结果表明:(1)不同土地利用类型下径流量与降雨量和降雨强度均呈显著正相关,总径流量表现为:林地(20.12 L/m2)<灌草地(23.80 L/m2)<农地(34.34 L/m2),各土地利用类型的变异系数为0.14～0.64,差异较大;(2)自然降雨条件下TN,NO-3-N和NH+4-N质量浓度均值表现为林地(3.20,2.08,0.50 mg/L)<灌草地(4.09,2.57,0.58 mg/L)<农地(4.95,3.16,0.88 mg/L),TP和PO-4-P质量浓度均值表现为林地(3.43,1.95 mg/L)<灌草地(4.33,2.57 mg/L)<农地(5.82,3.61 mg/L);(3)溶解态氮磷是径流水体中氮磷污染的主要污染物,其中NO-3-N和PO-4-P为径流氮磷流失的主要形态(56.81%～77.41%和50.12%～76.64%);(4)不同土地利用类型下TN和TP流失总量表现为林地(59.96,65.47 mg/m2)<灌草地(98.92,102.95 mg/m2)<农地(170.28,200.94 mg/m2)。因此,通过在流域内增加林地和灌草地面积,开展退耕还林还草工程,可减少该流域氮磷流失量,从而减缓和防治云南红壤丘陵区水土流失。
- Abstract:
- Three land use types(forest, shrub and farmland)in Cangfang small watershed in central Yunnan Province were studied as the research sites to reveal the characteristics of runoff and nitrogen and phosphorus losses in slope lands with different land use types in red soil hilly area. Runoff, nitrogen and phosphorus loss forms, concentrations and loss amounts of different land use types were measured during natural rainfall in rainy season in 2018. Characteristics of runoff, nitrogen and phosphorus losses in red soil hilly region were studied. The results showed that:(1)there was a significant positive correlation between runoff and rainfall and rainfall intensity under different land use types; the total runoff increased in the order: forest land(20.12 L/m2)<shrub land(23.80 L/m2)<farmland(34.34 L/m2); the variation coefficients of various land use types ranged from 0.14 to 0.64, and the difference was significant;(2)under natural rainfall conditions, the average concentrations of TN, NO-3-N and NH+4-N increased in the order: forest land(3.20, 2.08 and 0.50 mg/L)<shrub land(4.09, 2.57 and 0.58 mg/L)< armland(4.95, 3.16 and 0.88 mg/L), TP and PO-4-P increased in the order: forest land(3.43 and 1.95 mg/L)<shrub land(4.33 and 2.57 mg/L)<farmland(5.82 and 3.61 mg/L);(3)dissolved nitrogen and phosphorus were the main pollutants of nitrogen and phosphorus pollution in runoff, among which NO-3-N and PO-4-P were the main forms in runoff(56.81%～77.41% and 50.12%～76.64%);(4)the total losses of TN and TP under different land use types increased in the order: forest land(59.96 and 65.47 mg/m2)<shrub land(98.92 and 102.95 mg/m2)<farmland(170.28 and 200.94 mg/m2). Therefore, the nitrogen and phosphorus losses in the watershed can be reduced by increasing the areas of forestland and shrub land, and the conversion of farmland to forest and shrub land can be carried out, so as to slow down and prevent the soil erosion in the red soil hilly area of Yunnan Province.
参考文献/References:
[1] 金春玲,高思佳,叶碧碧,等.洱海西部雨季地表径流氮磷污染特征及受土地利用类型的影响[J].环境科学研究,2018,31(11):1891-1899.
[2] 马星,郑江坤,王文武,等.不同雨型下紫色土区坡耕地产流产沙特征[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(2):17-21.
[3] 云南省水利厅.云南省水利厅关于云南省2015年水土流失调查结果的公告[R].云南省水利厅,2017.
[4] 乔闪闪,吴磊,彭梦玲.人工模拟降雨条件下黄土坡面水—沙—氮磷流失特征[J].环境科学研究,2018,31(10):1728-1735.
[5] 王全九,赵光旭,刘艳丽,等.植被类型对黄土坡地产流产沙及氮磷流失的影响[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(14):195-201.
[6] 杨世琦,邢磊,刘宏元,等.松干流域不同种植模式对坡耕地土壤氮磷流失的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2018,46(3):61-69.
[7] 常松果,胡雪琴,史东梅,等.不同土壤管理措施下坡耕地产流产沙和氮磷流失特征[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(5):34-40.
[8] 向速林,陶术平,王逢武.不同土地利用类型降雨径流氮磷特征分析:以赣江下游地区为例[J].人民长江,2015,46(16):80-82.
[9] 李吉平,徐勇峰,陈子鹏,等.洪泽湖地区麦稻两熟农田和杨树林地氮磷径流流失特征研究[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2019,43(1):102-108.
[10] 韦宇,李秀寨,普晓莉.武定县耕地面积变化与经济发展关系研究[J].农村经济与科技,2015,26(3):17-19.
[11] 国家环境保护总局.水和废水监测分析方法[M].4版.北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002.
[12] 宋娅丽,王克勤,董莉,等.滇中烤烟坡耕地地表径流氮素的动态变化特征[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(4):7-11.
[13] 胡雪琴,蒋平,彭旭东,等.紫色丘陵区不同土地利用类型径流泥沙及氮磷流失特征[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(2):35-39.
[14] 林锦阔,李子君,许海超,等.降雨因子对沂蒙山区不同土地利用方式径流小区产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(5):7-12,19.
[15] 樊登星,余新晓,贾国栋,等.北京山区灌草坡面水土流失特征及其影响因素[J].中国水土保持科学,2014,12(2):24-28.
[16] 王国重,李中原,田颖超,等.雨强和土地利用类型对豫西南山区产流产沙的影响[J].武汉大学学报:工学版,2017,50(2):24-28.
[17] 谢颂华,莫明浩,涂安国,等.自然降雨条件下红壤坡面径流垂向分层输出特征[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(19):132-138.
[18] 何军,崔远来,王建鹏,等.不同尺度稻田氮磷排放规律试验[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(10):56-62.
[19] 陈安强,雷宝坤,刘宏斌,等.洱海近岸不同种植类型农田沟渠径流氮磷流失特征[J].生态与农村环境学报,2017,33(8):697-705.
[20] 李国栋,胡正义,杨林章,等.太湖典型菜地土壤氮磷向水体径流输出与生态草带拦截控制[J].生态学杂志,2006,25(8):905-910.
[21] Yang J L, Zhang G L, Shi X Z, et al. Dynamic changes of nitrogen and phosphorus losses in ephemeral runoff processes by typical storm events in Sichuan basin, Southwest China [J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2009,105(2):292-299.
[22] 张华渝,王克勤,宋娅丽,等.滇中尖山河小流域不同土地利用类型土壤活性有机碳分布特征[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(3):16-21.
[23] 向速林,陶术平,王逢武.赣江下游不同样地降雨径流氮磷污染负荷估算[J].生态科学,2016,35(2):62-65.
[24] 李晓娜,张国芳,武美军,等.不同植被过滤带对农田径流泥沙和氮磷拦截效果与途径[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(3):39-44,50.
相似文献/References:
[1]王希义,徐海量,潘存德,等.和田河流域土地生态系统服务价值变化及敏感性研究[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(06):334.
WANG Xiyi,XU Hailiang,PAN Cunde,et al.Study on the Service Value of Land Ecosystem and Sensitivity in Hotan River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(03):334.
[2]刘正刚,裴柏洋,王宪帅.岷江上游干旱河谷不同土地利用类型的土壤有机碳和易氧化态碳特征[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(03):24.
LIU Zheng-gang,PEI Bo-yang,WANG Xian-shuai.Characteristics of SOC and ROC under Different Land Use Types at Arid Valley in the Upper Reaches of Minjiang River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(03):24.
[3]赵晶,高照良,蔡艳蓉.高速公路建设对土地利用类型的影响及其生态服务价值评估——以陕西省5个典型区域为研究对象[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(03):226.
ZHAO Jing,GAO Zhao-liang,CAI Yan-rong.Impacts of Expressway Construction on Land Use Types and Assessment on the Ecosystem Service Value——A Case Study of Five Typical Areas in Shaanxi Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(03):226.
[4]刘泉,李鹏,李占斌,等.模拟降雨条件下坡地径流泥沙特征研究[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(03):1.
LIU Quan,LI Peng,LI Zhanbin,et al.Study on Characteristics of Losses of Runoff and Sediment in Slope Land Under Simulated Rainfall[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(03):1.
[5]覃淼,翟禄新,周正朝.桂北地区土地利用类型对土壤饱和导水率和持水能力的影响研究[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(03):28.
QIN Miao,ZHAI Luxin,ZHOU Zhengchao.Influence of Land Use Types on Soil Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity and Water Retention in Northern Guangxi[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(03):28.
[6]杨聪莉,王百群,申国婷,等.铅锌矿区不同土地利用类型铅污染特征及其影响因素[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(05):351.
YANG Congli,WANG Baiqun,SHEN Guoting,et al.Pb Pollution Characteristics and Their Affecting Factors in Different Land Use Types in Lead-Zinc Mining Zone[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(03):351.
[7]车风,黄国清,刘韬,等.2004-2015年湖北省植被NPP时空分布特征及其与气候因素关系[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(06):198.
CHE Feng,HUANG Guoqing,LIU Tao,et al.Spatiotemporal Distribution of Net Primary Productivity and Its Correlation with Meteorological Factors in Hubei Province from 2004 to 2015[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(03):198.
[8]李新国,古丽克孜·吐拉克,赖宁.基于RS/GIS的博斯腾湖湖滨绿洲土壤盐渍化敏感性研究[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(01):165.
LI Xinguo,Gulikezi·Tulake,LAI Ning.Study on the Sensitivity of Soil Salinization in the Lakeside Oasis of Bosten Lake Based on RS/GIS[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(03):165.
[9]崔东,肖治国,赵玉,等.不同土地利用类型对伊犁地区土壤活性有机碳库和碳库管理指数的影响[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(01):61.
CUI Dong,XIAO Zhiguo,ZHAO Yu,et al.Effects of Different Land Use Patterns on Soil Active Organic Carbon Pool and Carbon Pool Management Index in Yili Area, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(03):61.
[10]祝俊华,段旭,陈志新,等.延安地区生态环境与地质灾害相关性探讨[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(04):163.
ZHU Junhua,DUAN Xu,CHEN Zhixin,et al.Discussion of the Correlation Between Eco-environment and Geological Disasters in Yan’an Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(03):163.
[11]苏孟白,王克勤,宋娅丽,等.滇中尖山河流域不同土地利用类型产流及氮磷流失特征[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(05):24.
SU Mengbai,WANG Keqin,SONG Yali,et al.Characteristics of Runoff, Nitrogen and Phosphorus Losses Under Different Land-use Types in Jianshan River Basin in Middle Yunnan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(03):24.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2019-07-05 修回日期:2019-07-23资助项目:云南省重点研发计划(2018BC001); 云南省科技厅“三区”人才支持计划; 云南省高校优势特色重点学科(生态学)建设项目; 国家林业局生态学重点学科第一作者:杨昕(1996—),女,云南武定人,硕士研究生,主要从事生态恢复研究。E-mail:1219174890@qq.com通信作者:宋娅丽(1985—),女,山西长治人,博士,主要从事生态系统功能研究。E-mail:songyali19851205@sina.com