WEI Rong,LIU Ji,LI Shijun,et al.Characteristics of Dry and Wet Change of Climate in the Yalong River Basin During the Period 1961-2017[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(02):193-199.
雅砻江流域1961-2017年气候干湿变化特征
- Title:
- Characteristics of Dry and Wet Change of Climate in the Yalong River Basin During the Period 1961-2017
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2020)02-0193-07
- 关键词:
- 雅砻江流域; 干湿指数; 时空变化; Penman-Monteith
- 分类号:
- P467
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为了研究雅砻江流域的干湿状况,旨在为该地区气候区划和农业生产布局提供科学依据。利用1961—2017年雅砻江流域及周边16个气象站的逐月气象资料,使用FAO Penman-Monteith公式计算了研究区域的潜在蒸散量,进而求得干湿指数,并通过气候倾向率、Mann-Kendall(M-K)趋势检验以及突变检验等方法,分析了雅砻江流域干湿状况时空变化特征及空间差异。结果表明:近57年来,雅砻江流域干湿指数略有上升趋势,变化倾向率为0.002/10 a; 年内干湿指数总体上呈单峰变化,峰值出现在6—9月; 空间上,干湿指数自下游向上游先减小后增加,高值中心位于下游的康定和越西站,低值中心位于中游的甘孜和新龙站; 根据M-K趋势分析,雅砻江流域下游除西昌站外干湿指数呈显著下降趋势,中上游除清水河、石渠外呈显著上升趋势,整个流域约69.41%的地区呈显著上升趋势; 根据M-K突变分析,雅砻江流域干湿指数分别在1977年、2005年发生了从干到湿、从湿到干的突变; 干湿指数与平均气温、相对湿度、平均风速和降水量呈正相关,与日照时数和潜在蒸散量呈负相关,与相对湿度的相关系数最大。
- Abstract:
- In order to study the dry and wet conditions of the Yalong River Basin, to provide a scientific basis for the climate division and agricultural production layout in the region, based on the monthly data of 16 meteorological stations in the Yalong River Basin and its surrounding areas during the period 1961—2017, the potential evapotranspiration and dry-wet index of the study area were calculated using the FAO Penman-Monteith formula. The methods including climate tendency rate, Mann-Kendall(M-K)trend test and mutation test were used to analyze the spatial and temporal variations and spatial differences in dry and wet conditions in the Yalong River Basin. The results show that the dry-wet index of the Yalong RiverBasin slightly increased in the past 57 years with a change tendency rate of 0.002/decade; the dry-wet index showed a unimodal seasonality peaking from June to September; spatially, the dry-wet index decreased and then increased from the downstream to the upstream, the highest value was observed at Kangding and Yuexi stations in the downstream section, while the lowest was found at Ganzi and Xinlong stations in the midstream section; the M-K trend analysis suggests that the dry-wet index in the downstream of Yalong River Basin significantly decreased except Xichang station; the the dry-wet indoces of the middle and upper reaches showed a significant increaseing trend except Qingshuihe and Shiqu stations; overall, the dry-wet indices showed the significantly increasing trend over around 69.41% of the basin; according to the M-K mutation analysis, the dry-wet indices in Yalong River Basin abruptly changed from dry to wet conditions in 1977, and from wet to dry conditions in 2005; the dry-wet indices are positively correlated with average temperature, relative humidity, average wind speed and precipitation, and are negatively correlated with sunshine hours and potential evapotranspiration, the correlation coefficient between dry-wet index and relative humidity is the greatest.
参考文献/References:
[1] IPCC. Climate Change 2013:The Physical Sciencee Basis, the Summary for Policymakers of the Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report[R]. New York:Cambridge University Press, 2013.
[2] 沙比提,买买提,欢乐希,等.1961—2014年乌鲁木齐地区气候特征及干湿区变化[J].干旱气象,2016,34(3):448-455.
[3] 徐一丹,马熙达,吴丹,等.1957—2004年辽宁省干湿状况变化趋势分析[J].河南农业,2018,481(29):44-46.
[4] 胡甲秋,杨云川,邓思敏,等.基于多尺度SPI的广西干湿特征与未来趋势[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(5):319-324,336.
[5] Sarlak N, Mahmood Agha O M A M. Spatial and temporal variations of aridity indices in Iraq[J]. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2018,133(1/2):89-99.
[6] Zhao Y, Zou X, Cao L, et al. Spatiotemporal variations of potential evapotranspiration and aridity index in relation to influencing factors over Southwest China during 1960—2013[J]. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2018,133(3/4):711-726.
[7] Kafle H K, Bruins H J. Climatic trends in Israel 1970—2002: warmer and increasing aridity inland[J]. Climatic Change, 2009,96(1/2):63-77.
[8] 罗青红,宁虎森,陈启民.基于湿润指数的新疆甘家湖地表干湿状况变化趋势[J].干旱区研究,2016,33(5):921-926.
[9] 曹言,王杰,黄英,等.基于干燥指数的近45年云南滇中地区干湿状况的变化特征[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(1):243-249.
[10] 刘劲龙,徐刚,杨娟,等.近55年来四川盆地气候的干湿变化趋势分析[J].西南大学学报:自然科学版,2013,35(1):138-143.
[11] 苏秀程,王磊,李奇临,等.近50 a中国西南地区地表干湿状况研究[J].自然资源学报,2014,29(1):104-116.
[12] 王允,刘普幸,曹立国,等.基于湿润指数的1960—2011年中国西南地区地表干湿变化特征[J].自然资源学报,2014,29(5):830-838.
[13] 李新尧,孙小舟.鄂北岗地近54年来干湿指数变化[J].南水北调与水利科技,2015,13(5):853-857.
[14] 张方敏,申双和.中国干湿状况和干湿气候界限变化研究[J].南京气象学院学报,2008,31(4):574-579.
[15] 郭昭滨,王萍,李险峰,等.基于SPI的大兴安岭林区气候干湿时空变化[J].中国农学通报,2018,34(19):108-114.
[16] 魏光辉,邓丽娟.基于MK与SR非参数检验方法的干旱区降水趋势分析[J].西北水电,2014(4):1-4.
[17] 王建新,王健.序列一阶自相关对MK突变检验影响的探讨[J].山东理工大学学报:自然科学版,2018,32(2):66-69.
[18] 张逸飞,张中旺,孙小舟,等.1964—2013年汉江生态经济带干湿气候时空变化分析[J].长江科学院院报,2017,34(10):17-23,30.
[19] 王莺,李耀辉,姚玉璧,等.石羊河流域地表干湿变化的时空分布特征[J].资源科学,2013,35(10):2112-2120.
[20] Nyamtseren M, Feng Q, Deo R. A comparative study of temperature and precipitation:based aridity indices and their trends in Mongolia[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research, 2018,12(6):887-899.
[21] 安莉娟.1971—2010年内蒙古干湿变化特征及对水资源影响[J].冰川冻土,2016,38(3):732-740.
相似文献/References:
[1]龚成麒,董晓华,董立俊,等.雅砻江流域REOF分区的降水特征及其未来趋势分析[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(03):78.
GONG Chengqi,DONG Xiaohua,DONG Lijun,et al.Analysis of Precipitation Characteristics and Future Trends in the REOF Subarea of the Yalong River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(02):78.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2019-05-30 修回日期:2019-06-12 资助项目:国家自然科学基金“区域抗旱自适应能力形成机制与定量评估方法研究”(51709151) 第一作者:魏榕(1996—),男,福建厦门人,硕士研究生,研究方向为水文学与水资源研究。E-mail:649179417@qq.com 通信作者:刘冀(1980—),男,河北保定人,博士,副教授,主要从事流域水文模拟与防洪调度研究。E-mail:liuji@ctgu.edu.cn