DU Zhenyu,GE Zhongqiang,WANG Qinghua,et al.Assessment on Soil Quality of Platycladus orientalis Plantations in Central Mountainous Areas of Shandong Province and the Influence of Stand Density[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(02):128-135.
鲁中山地侧柏人工林土壤质量评价及林分密度的影响作用
- Title:
- Assessment on Soil Quality of Platycladus orientalis Plantations in Central Mountainous Areas of Shandong Province and the Influence of Stand Density
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2020)02-0128-08
- Keywords:
- central mountainous areas of Shandong Province; Platycladus orientalis plantation; soil quality; stand density
- 分类号:
- S714.2; S753.3
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为了解鲁中山地长期侧柏人工林土壤质量状况,研究不同林分密度对土壤质量的影响,为人工林的合理经营提供科学依据。以鲁中山地不同密度(1 300～6 400株/hm2)侧柏人工林样地土壤为研究对象,通过野外调查和室内分析,采用因子分析法研究了长期侧柏林土壤的物理、化学、生物及综合质量,并探讨了林分密度对侧柏人工林土壤质量的影响。结果表明:供试侧柏林地土壤质量综合得分与土壤硬度、有机质含量、过氧化氢酶活性均呈显著正相关(p<0.05),与毛管孔隙度、水解氮含量、脲酶活性具有极显著的正相关关系(p<0.01)。相比之下,黑峪林场侧柏林土壤整体质量优于燕子山林场和原山林场,后两者相差不大。随林分密度增加,侧柏林土壤化学、生物和综合质量均表现出显著下降; 林分密度增加会增加植物对养分的吸收,降低林内凋落物分解速率,不利于人工林系统内的养分再循环,从而导致林地土壤质量的下降。在林分密度较低(<2 500株/hm2)时,土壤质量平均得分分别是2 500～3 500株/hm2,3 500～4 500株/hm2和>4 500株/hm2密度组的2.11,2.02,2.27倍。鲁中山地侧柏林土壤质量受林分密度影响较大,在林分密度低于2 500株/hm2时具有较高的土壤化学、生物和综合质量。建议对鲁中山地侧柏人工林采取合理间伐措施,降低林分密度,提高林地土壤质量,以利于侧柏林可持续经营,从而更好地发挥生态效益。
- Abstract:
- In order to understand the soil quality of long-term Platycladus orientalis plantations in central mountainous area of Shandong Province, and to study the effects of different stand densities on soil quality, based on field investigation and indoor analysis, the physical, chemical, biological and comprehensive quality of the soils of Platycladus orientalis plantations with different densities(1 300～6 400 trees/hm2)in central mountainous area of Shandong Province were studied by factor analysis, and the effects of stand densities on soil quality of plantations were discussed. The results showed that comprehensive scores of soil quality of Platycladus orientalis plantations were significantly and positively correlated with soil hardness, organic matter content and catalase activity(p<0.05), and had highly significant correlation with capillary porosity, available N content and urease activity(p<0.01). In comparison, average soil quality of Platycladus orientalis plantations in Heiyu forest farm was better than those in Yanzishan and Yuanshan forest farm, and the latter two differed slightly. The physical, chemical, biological and comprehensive quality scores of forest soils significantly decreased with the increase of stand density. Increasing stand density could increase plant nutrient uptake and decrease litter decomposition rate, which is not conducive to nutrient recycling in plantation system, resulting in a decline in soil quality of forest land. The average score of soil quality at low density(<2 500 trees/hm2)was 2.11, 2.02 and 2.27 times as much as those at stand densities of 2 500～3 500 trees/hm2, 3 500～4 500 trees/hm2 and >4 500 trees/hm2, respectively. These results indicated that the soil quality of Platycladus orientalis plantations was greatly affected by stand density in central mountainous areas of Shandong Province. The soil chemical, biological and comprehensive qualities were higher when the stand density was less than 2 500 plants/hm2. It is suggested that rational thinning measures should be taken to reduce stand density and improve soil quality in order to facilitate sustainable management of Platycladus orientalis plantation in central mountainous area of Shandong Province, so as to bring ecological benefits into full play.
参考文献/References:
[1] 杨晓娟.东北长白山系低山丘陵区不同林分土壤肥力质量研究[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2013.
[2] Doran J W, Parkin T B. Defining and accessing soil quality [M]. Wisconsin, USA: Soil Science Society of America, 1994.
[3] 郑昭佩,刘作新.土壤质量及其评价[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(1):131-134.
[4] 马静.油松人工林土壤健康评价及生物调控研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2017.
[5] 覃其云,唐健,邓小军,等.广西马尾松人工林土壤肥力评价研究[J].林业调查规划,2017,42(6):16-21,32.
[6] 任丽娜,王海燕,丁国栋,等.华北土石山区人工林土壤健康评价研究[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(6):46-52.
[7] 漆良华,范少辉,艾文胜,等.湘中丘陵区竹杉混交对毛竹林土壤质量的影响[J].山地学报,2012,30(3):314-320.
[8] 张晋爱,张兴昌,邱丽萍,等.黄土丘陵区不同年限柠条林地土壤质量变化[J].农业环境科学学报,2007,26(S1):136-140.
[9] 黄宇,汪思龙,冯宗炜,等.不同人工林生态系统林地土壤质量评价[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(12):2199-2205.
[10] 胡建忠.山杨混交类型生产力及土壤质量综合评价[J].水土保持研究,1995,2(1):44-50.
[11] 方向华.南方红豆杉林地土壤质量变化特征[D].南京:南京林业大学,2017.
[12] 李淑芬,于法展,李保杰.苏北低山丘陵区典型性森林土壤健康评价研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(4):264-269.
[13] 燕婷婷,朱清科,赵维军,等.基于SPEI的鲁中山区1958—2015年干旱特征分析[J].西北林学院学报,2017,32(6):162-168.
[14] 国家林业局.森林土壤颗粒组成(机械组成)的测定LY/T1225—1999[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1999.
[15] 史瑞和.土壤农化分析[M].2版.北京:中国农业出版社,1990.
[16] 关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京:农业出版社,1986.
[17] 中国科学院南京土壤研究所微生物室.土壤微生物硏究法[M].北京:科学出版社,1985.
[18] 段必挺,杨锡永,李发平,等.基于因子分析的土壤肥力综合评价[J].现代农业科技,2016,669(7):228-230.
[19] 王清华,杜振宇,邢尚军,等.山东省主要公路路域生态环境评价[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(4):165-169.
[20] 孙希华.山东农业生态环境质量评价与发展策略[J].山东师范大学学报:自然科学版,1999,14(2):161-165.
[21] 路鹏,苏以荣,牛铮,等.土壤质量评价指标及其时空变异[J].中国生态农业学报,2007,15(4):190-194.
[22] 吕瑞恒,刘勇,于海群,等.北京山区不同林分类型土壤肥力的研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2009,31(6):159-163.
[23] 王兵,刘国彬,薛萐,等.黄土丘陵区撂荒对土壤酶活性的影响[J].草地学报,2009,17(3):282-287.
[24] 孙文艳,廖超英,李晓明,等.毛乌素沙地东南部人工林土壤生物学特性[J].西北林学院学报,2013,28(3):28-33.
[25] 张超,刘国彬,薛萐,等.黄土丘陵区不同林龄人工刺槐林土壤酶演变特征[J].林业科学,2010,46(12):23-29.
[26] 黄勇,杨忠芳.土壤质量评价国外研究进展[J].地质通报,2009,28(1):130-136.
[27] 张连金,赖光辉,孔颖,等.基于因子分析法的北京九龙山土壤质量评价[J].西北林学院学报,2016,31(3):7-14.
[28] 李国雷,刘勇,吕瑞恒.华北落叶松人工林密度调控对林下植被发育的作用过程[J].北京林业大学学报,2009,31(1):19-24.
[29] 姚瑞玲,丁贵杰,王胤.不同密度马尾松人工林凋落物及养分归还量的年变化特征[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2006,30(5):83-86.
[30] 孙书存,高贤明,包维楷,等.岷江上游油松造林密度对油松生长和群落结构的影响[J].应用与环境生物学报,2005,11(1):8-13.
[31] 王艳霞,吴承祯,洪伟,等.杉木人工林生长对密度效应的响应[J].森林与环境学报,2007,7(1):25-29.
[32] 鲁昭伟,陈波,潘青华,等.北京山地不同密度侧柏人工林枯落物及土壤水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(1):224-228.
[33] 康冰,刘世荣,蔡道雄,等.马尾松人工林林分密度对林下植被及土壤性质的影响[J].应用生态学报,2009,20(10):2323-2331.
[34] 赵广亮,王继兴,王秀珍,等.油松人工林密度与养分循环关系的研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2006,28(4):39-44.
[35] 张伟,杨传强,赵青.山东省侧柏人工林立地指数表的编制[J].山东林业科技,2014,44(3):6-10.
[36] 孙千惠,吴霞,王媚臻,等.林分密度对马尾松林林下物种多样性和土壤理化性质的影响[J].应用生态学报,2019,39(3):732-738.
[37] 赵广亮,王继兴,王秀珍,等.油松人工林密度与养分循环关系的研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2006,28(4):39-44.
[38] 梁燕,葛忠强,谢同利,等.鲁中山地侧柏人工林下植物多样性分析与评价[J].山东林业科技,2018,48(2):19-27.
[39] 李民义,张建军,郭宝妮,等.晋西黄土区不同密度油松人工林林下植物多样性及水文效应[J].生态学杂志,2013,32(5):1083-1090.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2019-04-19 修回日期:2019-05-21 资助项目:山东省重点研发计划(2016GNC111008); 山东省林业科技创新项目(LYCX03-2018-14) 第一作者:杜振宇(1973—),男,山东枣庄人,研究员,主要从事森林土壤、林木营养和森林生态方面研究。E-mail:zydu@qq.com 通信作者:王清华(1973—),女,山东烟台人,研究员,主要从事森林生态方面研究。E-mail:wqh0228@foxmail.com