SUN Congjian,HOU Huixin,CHEN Wei,et al.Research on Characteristics of Runoff and Sediment Yield of Typical Crop Field in the Hilly-Gully Region of the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(02):99-103,111.
黄土丘陵沟壑区典型农作物产流产沙效应研究
- Title:
- Research on Characteristics of Runoff and Sediment Yield of Typical Crop Field in the Hilly-Gully Region of the Loess Plateau
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2020)02-0099-05
- 分类号:
- S157.1
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为了分析不同农作物的产流产沙特性,基于冯家沟水土保持监测站2014—2016年的自然降雨数据及5种不同农作物(红薯、谷子、玉米、大豆、土豆)覆盖下的产流产沙量观测数据,分析了15°黄土坡面不同类型降雨条件下不同农作物产流产沙量规律。结果表明:(1)不同场次降雨中,玉米措施产流量及土壤流失量较大,红薯措施与谷子措施较小,土豆措施与大豆措施产流量及土壤流失量差别不大。(2)不同农作物的小区产流产沙量均与最大30 min降雨强度I30及降雨量呈显著和极显著相关关系。(3)研究区侵蚀性降水根据降雨量、降雨历时及I30可分为3种类型:Ⅰ雨型(降雨量、历时、雨强适中)、Ⅱ雨型(历时较长、雨量大、雨强较小)、Ⅲ雨型(历时短、降雨量较小、雨强大)。(4)5种作物在不同雨型下产流产沙特性不同,在Ⅲ雨型(降雨强度大、历时短)条件下各作物措施产流量及土壤流失量最大,不同雨型条件下红薯产流量及土壤流失量最小。相比其他农作物,红薯是研究区坡耕地水土流失防治的优良农作物,玉米不适用于坡耕地水土流失防治中种植。
- Abstract:
- In order to assess the characteristics of soil and water conservation, the data of individual rainfall, runoff and sediment yield of five crop fileds(sweet potato, millet, corn, soybeans, potatoes )from 2014 to 2016 in Fengjiagou station were used, and runoff and sediment yields of the different crop fields with 15° slope gradient under different rainfall events were systematically analyzed. The results showed that:(1)under different rainfall events, the runoff and sediment yield of maize field was greater, those of sweet potato and millet dields were less, and those of potato and soybean showed are almost the same;(2)runoff and sediment yields in different crop fields were significantly or very significantly related with I30 and rainfall amount, and the coefficients were different;(3)erosive rainfall could be divided into 3 types based on the total rainfall amount, duration of rainfall and I30: rainfall type Ⅰ(the rainfall, duration and I30 are moderate), rainfall type Ⅱ(the rainfall is large, the duration is long and I30 is small), rainfall type Ⅲ(the rainfall is small, the duration is short, I30 is large);(4)characteristics of the runoff and sediment yield in 5 types of crop fields under different rainfall types were different, the yield of runoff and sediment was the greatest under with rainfall type Ⅲ, the yield of runoff and sediment of sweet potato field was the least under different rainfall patterns. In the study area, compared with other crops, sweet potato was better for soil erosion control and corn was not suitable for soil erosion control in the slope cultivated land.
参考文献/References:
[1] 徐宪立,马克明,傅伯杰,等.植被与水土流失关系研究进展[J].生态学报,2006,26(9):3137-3143.
[2] 常松果,胡雪琴,史东梅,等.不同土壤管理措施下坡耕地产流产沙和氮磷流失特征[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(5):34-40.
[3] 朱明勇,谭淑端,张全发.近60年汉江流域侵蚀性降雨的时空变化特征[J].生态环境学报,2013,22(9):1544-1549.
[4] 晏清洪,原翠萍,雷廷武,等.降雨类型和水土保持对黄土区小流域水土流失的影响[J].农业机械学报,2014,45(2):169-175.
[5] 梁永哲,夏振尧,牛鹏辉,等.三峡库区小流域降雨入渗和产流产沙特征试验研究[J].长江科学院院报,2016,33(2):28-32.
[6] 丛鑫,边振,薛春珂,等,不同坡度条件下的水土流失特征研究[J].中国农村水利水电,2017(5):124-128.
[7] 张珊珊,周忠发,孙小涛,等.基于坡度等级的喀斯特山区石漠化与水土流失相关性研究:以贵州省盘县为例[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(2):82-89.
[8] 戴金梅,查轩,黄少燕,等.不同植被覆盖度对紫色土坡面侵蚀过程的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(3):33-38.
[9] 姜娜,邵明安.黄土高原小流域不同坡地利用方式的水土流失特征[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(6):36-41.
[10] 王兵,刘国彬,张光辉,等.黄土丘陵区中尺度流域水土流失治理环境效应评估[J].农业机械学报,2012,43(7):28-35.
[11] 王超,甄霖,杜秉贞,等.黄土高原典型区退耕还林还草工程实施效果实证分析[J].中国生态农业学报,2014,22(7):850-858.
[12] 吴昱,刘慧,杨爱峥,等.黑土区坡耕地施加生物炭对水土流失的影响[J].农业机械学报,2018,49(5):294-301.
[13] 王升,王全九,董文财,等.黄土坡面不同植被覆盖度下产流产沙与养分流失规律[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(4):23-27.
[14] 李元寿,王根绪,沈永平,等.长江源区不同植被覆盖下产流产沙效应初步研究[J].冰川冻土,2005,27(6):869-875.
[15] 杨爱峥,魏永霞,张忠学,等.坡耕地综合治理技术模式的蓄水保土及增产效应[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(11):222-226.
[16] 张雷,金胜利,张光全,等.双垄全膜覆盖沟播栽培对甘肃中部坡耕地水土流失和作物产量的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2012,30(1):113-118.
[17] 赵龙山,侯瑞,吴发启,等.坡度对农业耕作措施水土保持作用的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(3):69-72.
[18] 黄志霖,傅伯杰,陈利顶.黄土丘陵区不同坡度、土地利用类型与降水变化的水土流失分异[J].中国水土保持科学,2005,3(4):11-18.
[19] 徐勇,田均良,刘普灵,等.黄土高原坡耕地水土流失地形分异模拟[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(5):18-25.
[20] 陈光荣,张国宏,高世铭,等.粮草豆隔带种植保护性耕作对坡耕地水土流失的影响[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(4):54-58.
[21] 王立,黄高宝,王生鑫,等.粮草豆隔带种植保护性耕作水土流失规律[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(2):54-57.
[22] 张晓艳,王立,黄高宝,等.道地药材保护性耕作对坡耕地土壤侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持学报,2008,22(2):58-61.
[23] 顾朝军,穆兴民,孙文义,等.极端暴雨洪水及侵蚀产沙对延河流域植被恢复响应的比较研究[J].自然资源学报,2017,32(10):1755-1767.
[24] 卫伟,陈利顶,傅伯杰,等.半干旱黄土丘陵沟壑区降水特征值和下垫面因子影响下的水土流失规律[J].生态学报,2006,26(11):3847-3853.
[25] 马星,郑江坤,王文武,等.不同雨型下紫色土区坡耕地产流产沙特征[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(2):17-21.
[26] 孙从建,侯慧新,陈伟,等.典型黄土塬区不同植物措施水土保持效应分析[J].自然资源学报,2019,34(7):1405-1406.
[27] 王丰,徐佩,严坤,等.三峡库区典型农作物对降雨侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(1):92-101.
[28] 高磊,饶良懿,崔飞波,等.太行山土石山区侵蚀性降雨对典型植物措施产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(1):5-11.
[29] 苗全安,曹凑贵,汪金平,等.丹江口库区坡耕地不同作物对土壤溅蚀的影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2011,9(5):11-14.
[30] 宋江平,李忠武,刘春,等.湘北红壤低山丘陵区典型水土流失治理模式径流泥沙效应[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(1):32-38.
相似文献/References:
[1]张永旺,万珊珊,王 俊,等.黄土高原植被演替过程中土壤水分亏缺[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(05):120.
ZHANG Yongwang,WAN Shanshan,WANG Jun,et al.Soil Water Deficit During Vegetation Succession on the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(02):120.
[2]刘 迪,邓 强,时新荣,等.黄土高原刺槐人工林根际和非根际土壤磷酸酶活性对模拟降水变化的响应[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(01):95.
LIU Di,Dengqiang,SHI Xinrong,et al.Responses of Phosphatase Activity in Rhizosphere and Non-rhizosphere Soils to Simulated Precipitation Changes in Planted Robinia pseudoacacia Forest on the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(02):95.
[3]陈文广,孔祥斌,廖宇波,等.黄土高原区耕地质量评价——以陕西省延川县为例[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(02):375.
A Case Study of Yanchuan County,Shaanxi Province.Evaluation of Cultivated Land Quality in the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(02):375.
[4]邓 强,刘 迪,时新荣,等.黄土高原刺槐人工林林下植物多样性对模拟降水变化的响应[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(01):1.
DENG Qiang,LIU Di,SHI Xinrong,et al.Effects of Manipulative Precipitation on Plant Species Diversity in the Understory of Planted Robinia pseudoacacia Forest on the Loess Plateau, China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(02):1.
[5]林 枫,王丽芳,文 琦.黄土高原土壤有机碳固存对植被恢复的动态响应及其碳汇价值[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(03):53.
LIN Feng,WANG Lifang,WEN Qi.Dynamic Responses of Sequestration of Soil Organic Carbon to Vegetation Restoration and the Values of Carbon Sink in the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(02):53.
[6]李 豆,李朋飞,穆兴民,等.机载LiDAR测量复杂地形中滤波算法的比较研究[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(04):171.
LI Dou,LI Pengfei,MU Xingmin,et al.Accuracy of Airborne LiDAR Point Cloud Filtering for Areas with Complex Terrain[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(02):171.
[7]赵 艳,岳大鹏,赵景波,等.明代陕西黄土高原中南部地区洪涝灾害[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(05):187.
ZHAO Yan,YUE Dapeng,ZHAO Jingbo,et al.Flood Disasters in the Central and Southern Loess Plateau of Shaanxi in Ming Dynasty[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(02):187.
[8]董红梅,赵景波,宋友桂,等.黄土高原白水县不同种植年限苹果园土壤重金属含量特征与风险评价[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(05):205.
DONG Hongmei,ZHAO Jingbo,SONG Yougui,et al.Characteristics and Risk Assessment of Heavy Metal Content in Soils of Apple Orchard with Different Cultivating Years in Baishui County on the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(02):205.
[9]张家政,李崇贵,王 涛.黄土高原植被覆盖时空变化及原因[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(01):224.
ZHANG Jiazheng,LI Chonggui,WANG Tao.Dynamic Changes of Vegetation Coverage on the Loess Plateau and Its Factors[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(02):224.
[10]靳小莲,赵 巍,李梦迪,等.黄土高原退耕还草土壤水分对植物地上部化学计量特征的影响[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(02):57.
JIN Xiaolian,ZHAO Wei,LI Mengdi,et al.Effects of Soil Moisture on the Stoichiometric Characteristics of Aboveground Plants Following Conversion of Farmland to Grassland on the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(02):57.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2019-03-31 修回日期:2019-05-20 资助项目:山西省研究生教改项目(2018JG57,2019JG123); 山西师范大学教改项目(2018JGXM-08); 国家自然科学基金(41601317) 第一作者:孙从建(1986—),男,河北沧州人,副教授,博士(后),主要从事气候变化与水循环研究。E-mail:suncongjian@sina.com 通信作者:陈伟(1987—),女,辽宁铁岭人,副教授,博士研究生,主要从事土壤学研究。E-mail:wan_xin_chen@126.com