LI Yi,YANG Zisong.Soil Nutrients and Soil Microbial Characteristics and Their Relationships Under Different Land Use Types in Minjiang River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(01):33-38,46.
岷江流域不同土地利用方式下的土壤微生物特征及其与土壤养分的关系
- Title:
- Soil Nutrients and Soil Microbial Characteristics and Their Relationships Under Different Land Use Types in Minjiang River Basin
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2020)01-0033-06
- 分类号:
- Q154
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 采用经典统计分析与排序分析,研究了2014—2018年岷江流域不同土地利用方式下(撂荒地、次生林、灌丛、果园和耕地)土壤微生物群落多样性变化特征,并探讨了其与土壤养分和土壤微生物数量之间的关系。结果表明:(1)土壤pH值变化范围为6.13～7.02,其大小依次表现为撂荒地<次生林<灌丛<果园<耕地,其中耕地和果园差异不显著(p>0.05),耕地最高(p<0.05); 土壤有机碳、全氮、全钾、有效磷和有效钾大小依次表现为撂荒地>次生林>灌丛>果园>耕地,不同土地利用土壤有效磷和有效钾差异均显著(p<0.05),而不同土地利用土壤全磷差异不显著(p>0.05)。(2)土壤微生物以细菌数目最多,占到90%以上,土壤细菌、真菌、放线菌和微生物总数目大小依次表现为撂荒地>次生林>灌丛>果园>耕地。(3)根据培养第100小时的AWCD值计算土壤微生物群落的物种丰富度指数(H)、均匀度指数(E)、优势度指数(Ds)和碳源利用丰富度指数(S)。土壤微生物多样性指数大小依次表现为撂荒地>次生林>灌丛>果园>耕地,不同土地利用均匀度指数(E)、优势度指数(Ds)差异不显著(p>0.05)。(4)相关性分析表明土壤养分、土壤微生物数量均与土壤微生物群落多样性具有显著的相关性(p<0.05),其中,土壤微生物数量对微生物群落多样性的贡献最大(其相关系数绝对值最大)。(5)冗余分析表明土壤微生物群落多样性与土壤养分含量均呈正相关(除了pH); 有机碳和全氮与丰富度指数相关性最大,由此可知,有机碳和全氮是影响该区土壤微生物群落多样性分布的主要因子。
- Abstract:
-
The variation characteristics of soil microbial community diversity in different land use patterns(abandoned lands, secondary forests, shrubs, orchards and cultivated lands)in minjiang river basin from 2014 to 2018 were studied by using classical statistical analysis and sequencing analysis, and the relationship between them and soil nutrients and soil microbial quantity was discussed. The results showed that:(1)the pH value of the soil ranged from 6.13 to 7.02, and the pH values of the abandoned lands increased in the order: secondary forest
0.05), and soil pH of the cultivated land was the highest (p<0.05); the levels of soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, total potassium, available phosphorus and available potassium decreased in the order: secondary forests>shrubs>orchards>cultivated land>abandoned lands; the differences of available phosphorus and available potassium in different land uses were significant (p<0.05), while the differences of total phosphorus in different land uses were not significant (p>0.05);(2)the number of soil microorganisms was the largest, accounting for more than 90%; the total number of soil bacteria, fungi, actinomycetes and microorganisms decreased in the order: secondary forests>shrubs>orchards>cultivated land>abandoned lands;(3)species richness index(H), evenness index(E), dominance index(Ds)and carbon source utilization richness index(S)of soil microbial community were calculated according to AWCD value at 100 h; the soil microbial diversity index decreased in the order: secondary forests>shrubs>orchards>cultivated land>abandoned lands, no significant difference in the evenness index(E)and dominance index(Ds)was found (p>0.05);(4)correlation analysis showed that soil nutrients and soil microbial quantity were significantly correlated with soil microbial community diversity (p<0.05), among which soil microbial quantity contributed the most to microbial community diversity(with the largest absolute value of correlation coefficient);(5)redundancy analysis showed that soil microbial community diversity was positively correlated with soil nutrient contents; along the first sequencing axis of RDA, with the increase of significant influencing factors(soil nutrient indexes), the microbial richness index gradually increased, and the microbial richness index was negatively correlated with pH value; organic carbon and total nitrogen had the largest correlation with richness index, therefore, organic carbon and total nitrogen were the main factors affecting the diversity distribution of soil microbial community in this area.
参考文献/References:
[1] Prober S M, Leff J W, Bates S T, et al. Plant diversity predicts beta but not alpha diversity of soil microbes across grasslands worldwide[J]. Ecology Letters, 2015,18(1):85-95.
[2] Zhou J, Deng Y, Shen L, et al. Temperature mediates continental-scale diversity of microbes in forest soils[J]. Nature Communications, 2016,7:12083.
[3] Delgado-Baquerizo M, Reich P B, Khachane A N, et al. It is elemental: soil nutrient stoichiometry drives bacterial diversity[J]. Environmental Microbiology, 2017,19(3):1176-1188.
[4] Lange M, Eisenhauer N, Sierra C A, et al. Plant diversity increases soil microbial activity and soil carbon storage[J]. Nature Communications, 2015,6:6707.
[5] Delgado-Baquerizo M, Maestre F T, Reich P B, et al. Microbial diversity drives multifunctionality in terrestrial ecosystems[J]. Nature Communications, 2016,7:10541.
[6] Baldrian P. Forest microbiome:diversity, complexity and dynamics[J]. Fems Microbiology Reviews, 2017,41(2):109-130.
[7] Fontaine S, Barot S. Size and functional diversity of microbe populations control plant persistence and long-term soil carbon accumulation[J]. Ecology Letters, 2005,8(10):1075-1087.
[8] Crawford J W, Deacon L, Grinev D, et al. Microbial diversity affects self-organization of the soil-microbe system with consequences for function[J]. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2012,9(71):1302-1310.
[9] Xie K, Yang S, Xu P, et al. Contamination of Paddy Soil by Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals Affects Soil Microbe Abundance and Diversity[J]. Journal of Soil Contamination, 2013,22(5):510-520.
[10] Mg V D H, Bardgett R D, van Straalen N M. The unseen majority: soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems[J]. Ecology Letters, 2010,11(3):296-310.
[11] Schnitzer S A, Klironomos J N, Hillerislambers J, et al. Soil microbes drive the classic plant diversity-productivity pattern[J]. Ecology, 2011,92(2):296-303.
[12] Crump B C, Amaralzettler L A, Kling G W. Microbial diversity in arctic freshwaters is structured by inoculation of microbes from soils[J]. Isme Journal, 2012,6(9):1629-1639.
[13] Kuramae E E, Yergeau E, Wong L C, et al. Soil characteristics more strongly influence soil bacterial communities than land-use type[J]. Fems Microbiology Ecology, 2015,79(1):12-24.
[14] Kang J H, Lee S W, Cho K H, et al. Linking land-use type and stream water quality using spatial data of fecal indicator bacteria and heavy metals in the Yeongsan river basin[J]. Water Research, 2010,44(14):4143-4157.
[15] Gan H, Liu Y S, Wang D W. Simulation and analysis of the human driving factors of land use type conversion[J]. Resources Science, 2004,26(2):88-93.
[16] Man L, Cai Z, Chang S X. Effects of land use type and incubation temperature on greenhouse gas emissions from Chinese and Canadian soils[J]. Journal of Soils & Sediments, 2011,11(1):15-24.
[17] Man L, Cai Z C, Mary B, et al. Land-use type and temperature affect gross nitrogen transformation rates in Chinese and Canadian soils[J]. Plant & Soil, 2010,334(1/2):377-389.
[18] Tonkaz T, ?etin M. Effects of urbanization and land-use type on monthly extreme temperatures in a developing semi-arid region, Turkey[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2007,68(1):143-158.
[19] Hyv?nen T, Glemnitz M, Radics L, et al. Impact of climate and land use type on the distribution of Finnish casual arable weeds in Europe[J]. Weed Research, 2011,51(2):201-208.
[20] 陈栩,沈初见.土壤微生物分解作用的研究[J].生物学通报,2006,41(11):36-37.
[21] 田兴军,立石贵浩.亚高山针叶林土壤动物和土壤微生物对针叶分解的作用[J].植物生态学报,2002,26(3):257-263.
[22] 杨钙仁,童成立,张文菊,等.陆地碳循环中的微生物分解作用及其影响因素[J].土壤通报,2005,36(4):605-609.
[23] 陈法霖,郑华,欧阳志云,等.土壤微生物群落结构对凋落物组成变化的响应[J].土壤学报,2011,48(3):603-611.
[24] 林开敏,章志琴,邹双全,等.杉木与阔叶树叶凋落物混合分解对土壤性质的影响[J].土壤通报,2006,37(2):258-262.
[25] PCR-DGGE技术解析针叶和阔叶凋落物混合分解对土壤微生物群落结构的影响[J].应用与环境生物学报,2011,17(2):145-150.
[26] 肖波,刘增文,孙强.不同林地凋落叶混合分解对土壤微生物量C,N的影响[J].西北林学院学报,2008,23(4):28-31,34.
相似文献/References:
[1]杜华明,贺胜英.岷江流域降水特征与旱涝灾害趋势分析[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(01):153.
DU Huaming,HE Shengying.The Analysis on Characteristics of Precipitation and Trends in Drought and Flood Disasters in Minjiang River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(01):153.
[2]蒋溢,李亦秋.岷江流域不同土地利用方式下紫色土壤活性有机碳分布特征及其影响因子[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(05):33.
JIANG Yi,LI Yiqiu.Labile Organic Carbon of Different Land Use Patterns in Minjiang River Basin, Sichuan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(01):33.
[3]胡尧,李懿,侯雨乐.不同土地利用方式对岷江流域土壤团聚体稳定性及有机碳的影响[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(04):22.
HU Yao,LI Yi,HOU Yule.Effects of Land Use Types on Stability and Organic Carbon of Soil Aggregates in Minjiang River Valley[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(01):22.
[4]靳 峰,张 富,胡彦婷,等.半干旱区降水-土地利用变化与水沙响应关系[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(03):63.
JIN Feng,ZHANG Fu,HU Yanting,et al.Effect of Change in Precipitation-Land Use on Runoff and Sediment Transport in Semi-Arid Areas[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(01):63.
[5]张 韵,彭建东,王晶晶,等.基于地学信息图谱的江汉平原土地利用时空变化分析[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(04):85.
ZHANG Yun,PENG Jiandong,WANG Jingjing,et al.Analysis on Spatial and Temporal Change of Land Use in Jianghan Plain Based on Geo-information Atlas[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(01):85.
[6]张 欢,高小红.复杂地形区土壤有机质空间变异性分析及制图[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(05):93.
ZHANG Huan,GAO Xiaohong.Analysis of Spatial Variability and Mapping of Soil Organic Matter Contents in Complex Terrain Areas[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(01):93.
[7]张晓东,赵银鑫,褚小东,等.基于遥感的银川市城区热环境及其影响因素的时空演变特征[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(06):180.
ZHANG Xiaodong,ZHAO Yinxin,CHU Xiaodong,et al.Spatial and Temporal Evolution Characteristics of Thermal Environment and Its Influencing Factors in Urban Area of Yinchuan City Based on Remote Sensing[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(01):180.
[8]魏梦瑶,张卓栋,刘瑛娜,等.基于CSLE模型的广西土壤侵蚀规律[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(01):15.
WEI Mengyao,ZHANG Zhuodong,LIU Yingna,et al.Characteristics of Soil Erosion in Guangxi Based on CSLE[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(01):15.
[9]赵方圆,杨宇翔,张华堂,等.土地利用及景观格局动态变化分析——以甘肃省党河流域为例[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(03):235.
ZHAO Fangyuan,YANG Yuxiang,ZHANG Huatang,et al.Analysis on Dynamic Change of Land Use and Landscape Pattern[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(01):235.
[10]张文辉,周忠发,张 淑,等.FAST电磁波宁静区人类活动时空分布特征[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(04):275.
ZHANG Wenhui,ZHOU Zhongfa,ZHANG Shu,et al.Spatiotemporal Distribution Characteristics of Human Activities in FAST Electromagnetic Wave Quiet Zone[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(01):275.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2019-03-03 修回日期:2019-04-17
资助项目:四川省教育厅重点课题“野生百合种植资源圃建设及《中国野生百合图谱》编写”(18ZA0001)
第一作者:李懿(1981—),男,四川会理人,硕士,助理研究员,研究方向:微生物学,资源与环境微生物。E-mail:Leeyii_811@163.com