YUAN Dapeng,SHI Yao,ZHAO Xueshan,et al.Study on the Ecological Service Value of the Mountainous Basin in the Northwest of Hebei Province Based on the Soil Type Region—A Case Study of Huailai County[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(02):307-314.
基于土壤类型区的冀西北间山盆地生态服务价值研究——以怀来县为例
- Title:
- Study on the Ecological Service Value of the Mountainous Basin in the Northwest of Hebei Province Based on the Soil Type Region—A Case Study of Huailai County
- Keywords:
- soil type; land use; ecological service value; Huailai County
- 分类号:
- S155;F301
- 摘要:
- 为研究不同土壤类型区的土地生产力，对生态服务价值产生一定的影响。根据怀来县3期土地利用现状图、土壤类型图以及野外调查结果为基本数据，以土壤类型区为评价单元，利用怀来县2012年各土壤类型区的粮食基准单产对谢高地等提出的生态系统服务价值当量因子表进行了区位修正，定量分析了怀来县1992-2012年各土壤类型区的土地利用类型的数量变化，同时重点开展了不同区位的土地生产力差异分析以及各地类在土壤类型区上的生态服务价值和土地生态服务功能结构信息熵指标的分析。结果表明：各区位土地利用变化主要以林地、建设用地、园地缓慢增加，耕地、未利用地缓慢减少为总体特征；粮食产量分布由西北向东南呈递减趋势，各区位土地生产力大小依次为灌淤土 > 潮土 > 水稻土 > 褐土 > 粗骨土 > 风沙土 > 棕壤；生态服务价值总体上由南北山地丘陵区向中间盆地依次递减，褐土区最大为126 013.93万元/a，水稻土区最小56.15万元/a，主要由林地和园地支撑；棕壤区、粗骨土区、灌淤土区、风沙土区、水稻土区的土地生态服务功能结构信息熵指标Hf分别为0.32，0.65，0.34，0.82，0.86，说明此区域的土地利用程度较为有序，结构性较强，有利于生产活动的开展；褐土区、潮土区的Hf分别为1.04，1.68，说明此区域的土地利用程度有序性较差，结构稳定性较弱，土地生态系统的健康程度低，不利于生产活动的展开。该区域整体上土地利用程度保持稳定状态。
- Abstract:
- In order to study a certain influence of the land productivity of different soil types on ecological service value, according to the status quo of land use in Huailai County, soil type map and field survey results, the soil type area is used as the evaluation unit, and the grain yield of Hualai County in 2012 is based on the grain yield, the number of land use types in the soil type areas of Huailai County from 1992 to 2012, and the differences in land productivity in different areas, as well as the value of ecological service and the information entropy index of functional structure of land ecological service were quantitatively analyzed. The results showed that the land use change was featured as the slow increase of forestland,construction land and garden land, and the decrease of cultivated land and unused land. The distribution of grain yield was decreasing from northwest to southeast, and the land productivity decreased in the order:the anthropogenic-alluvial soils > moisture soil > paddy soil > cinnamon soil > skeleton soil > aeolian sandy soil > brown soil; ecological service value decreased in general from the north and south mountainous hilly area to the middle basin, the ecological service value of cinnamon area maximum was 1.260×109 yuan/year, the paddy soil area is the smallest, and ecological service value of the paddy soil area was 5.615×105 yuan/year, which were mainly supported by woodland and garden. The information entropy index of Hf in the brown soil area, coarse soil area, irrigated soil area, sandy soil area and paddy soil area were 0.32, 0.65, 0.34, 0.82, 0.86, respectively, indicating that the land use degree in these areas were relatively orderly and structurally strong, which was beneficial to the development of production activities. The Hf of cinnamon soil and tidal soil area were 1.04, 1.68, respectively, suggesting that the land use degree of this area was poorly ordered, the structural stability was weak, the health degree of the land ecosystem was low, which was not conducive to the development of the production activities. The extent of land use in the region remains stable as a whole.
参考文献/References:
[1] 蔡璐.论社会发展与土地资源的保护[J].资源与人居环境,2009(2):54-55.
[2] 刘军会,高吉喜,聂亿黄.青藏高原生态系统服务价值的遥感测算及其动态变化[J].地理與地理信息科学,2009,25(3):81-84.
[3] 李秀彬.全球环境变化研究的核心领域:土地利用/土地覆被变化的国际研究动向[J].地理学报,1996(6):553-558.
[4] 熊惠波,周燕芳,江源,等.扎鲁特旗土地利用变化中的生态损益估算[J].干旱区研究,2003,20(2):98-103.
[5] Costanza R, d’Arge R, De Groot R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. nature,1997,387(6630):253-260.
[6] 欧阳志云,王如松.生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值评价[J].应用生态学报,1999,10(5):635-639.
[7] 王广成,李中才.基于时空尺度及利益关系的生态服务功能[J].生态学报,2007,27(11):4758-4765.
[8] 谢高地,鲁春霞,冷允法,等.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(2):189-196.
[9] 郝慧梅,任志远.基于生态服务价值的土地利用/覆盖变化生态效应测评[J].资源科学,2007,29(6):90-97.
[10] 高清竹,何立环.海河上游农牧交错地区生态系统服务价值的变化[J].自然资源学报,2002,17(6):706-712.
[11] 孙慧兰,李卫红,陈亚鹏,等.新疆伊犁河流域生态服务价值对土地利用变化的响应[J].生态学报,2010,30(4):887-894.
[12] 薛达元,包浩生,李文华.长白山自然保护区森林生态系统间接经济价值评估[J].中国环境科学,1999,19(3):247-252.
[13] 肖寒,欧阳志云,赵景柱,等.森林生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值评估初探:以海南岛尖峰岭热带森林为例[J].应用生态学报,2000,11(4):481-484.
[14] 全国土壤普查办公室.中国土壤[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1998.
[15] 徐立.土地利用变化对长沙市生态系统服务价值的影响研究[D].长沙:湖南大学,2009.
[16] 杜金龙.土地利用变化及其对生态系统服务价值影响研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2010.
[17] 宗跃光,陈红春,郭瑞华,等.地域生态系统服务功能的价值结构分析:以宁夏灵武市为例[J].地理研究,2000,19(2):148-155.
[18] 邓舒洪.区域土地利用变化与生态系统服务价值动态变化研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2012.
[19] 孙慧兰,李卫红,陈亚鹏,等.新疆伊犁河流域生态服务价值对土地利用变化的响应[J].生态学报,2010,30(4):887-894.
[20] 段瑞娟,郝晋珉,张洁瑕.北京区位土地利用与生态服务价值变化研究[J].农业工程学报,2006,9(22):21-28.
[21] 王宗明,张柏,张树清.吉林省生态系统服务价值变化研究[J].自然资源学报,2004,19(1):55-61.
[22] 刘小翠.露天矿区生态系统服务价值的动态变化研究[D].北京:中国地质大学,2010.
[23] 陈美球,赵宝苹,罗志军,等.基于RS与GIS的赣江上游流域生态系统服务价值变化[J].生态学报,2013,33(9):2761-2767.
[24] 周飞,陈士银,吴明发.土地利用结构变化及其生态服务功能响应:以广东省湛江市为例[J].安全与环境学报,2007,7(5):76-79.
[25] 王思远,刘纪远,张增祥,等.中国土地利用时空特征分析[J].地理学报,2001,56(6):631-639.
[26] 吴后建,王学雷,宁龙梅,等.土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响:以武汉市为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2006,15(2):185-190.
相似文献/References:
[1]范新军,毕天云.云南边境石漠化地区“三生空间”格局演变及驱动机制[J].水土保持研究,2025,32(06):424.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2025.06.011]
Fan Xinjun,Bi Tianyun.Evolution of production-living-ecological space pattern and its driving mechanisms in rocky desertification areas of Yunnan border region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2025,32(02):424.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2025.06.011]
[2]徐 云,高明坤,张增信.基于InVEST模型的长江中下游地区生境质量变化研究[J].水土保持研究,2024,31(05):355.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.05.032]
Xu Yun,Gao Mingkun,Zhang Zengxin.Land Use Change and Its Impact on Habitat Quality in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River Based on InVEST Model[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(02):355.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.05.032]
[3]孙保平,孙立达.西吉县黄家二岔小流域地表径流和土壤渗透性能的研究[J].水土保持研究,1990,(02):16.
Sun Baoping,Sun Lida.A Research For Soil Permeability and Surface Runoff in Huangjia-Ercha Small Watershed in Xiji County, Ningxia[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1990,(02):16.
[4]赵昭霞,叶树华.渭南地区土地利用现状简析[J].水土保持研究,1992,(02):35.
Zhao Zhaoxia,Yie Shuhua.ANALYSIS OF LAND UTILIZATION OF WEINAN PREFECTURE[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1992,(02):35.
[5]贾恒义,雍绍萍,王富乾.神木试区的土壤资源[J].水土保持研究,1993,(02):36.
Jia Hengyi,Yong Shaoping,Wang Fuqian.The Soil Resource in the Shenmu Experimental Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1993,(02):36.
[6]杨勤科,郑粉莉,张竹梅.神木试区土地资源与利用[J].水土保持研究,1993,(02):47.
Yang Qinke,Zheng Fenli,Zhang Zhumei.Land Resources and Its Utilization in the Shenmu Experimental Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1993,(02):47.
[7]张希彪,上官周平.陇东黄土高原土地利用空间格局研究[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(04):167.
ZHANG Xi-biao,SHANGGUAN Zhou-ping.Study on the Spatial Pattern of Land-use in Longdong Areas[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(02):167.
[8]闫岩,雷国平,谢英楠.基于AHP和熵权法的土地利用生态效益研究[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(06):134.
YAN Yan,LEI Guo-ping,XIE Ying-nan.Study on Evaluation of Land Use Ecological Efficiency Based on AHP and Entropy Weight Method[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(02):134.
[9]路昌,雷国平,张慧,等.黑龙江省哈尔滨市不同土地利用类型的碳排放效应分析[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(06):245.
LU Chang,LEI Guo-ping,ZHANG Hui,et al.Effects of Different Land Use Patterns on Carbon Emission in Harbin City of Heilongjiang Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(02):245.
[10]陈杰,杨太保,何毅.石羊河下游民勤土地利用及景观格局动态分析[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(06):251.
CHEN Jie,YANG Tai-bao,HE Yi.Analysis on Dynamic Characteristics of Landscape Patterns in Minqin of Shiyang River Downstream[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(02):251.
[11]武文一,刘瑛,梁继业.基于GIS和RS的荒漠区土壤侵蚀研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(05):10.
WU Wen-yi,LIU Ying,LIANG Ji-ye.Study on Soil Erosion in Desertification Area Based on GIS and RS[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(02):10.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2017-4-24;改回日期:2017-5-10。
基金项目:国土资源部公益性行业科研专项经费（201311060）；河北省科技支撑计划（132276329）
作者简介:袁大鹏(1994-),男,河北承德人,硕士生,研究方向为土壤与土地资源持续利用。E-mail:1020081065@qq.com
通讯作者:王树涛(1978-),男,河北威县人,副教授,博士,主要从事土地资源持续利用研究。E-mail:wangst@hebau.edu.cn