[1]李可,朱海丽,宋路,等.青藏高原两种典型植物根系抗拉特性与其微观结构的关系[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(02):240-249.
　LI Ke,ZHU Haili,SONG Lu,et al.Relationship Between Tensile Properties and Microstructure of Two Typical Plant Roots in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(02):240-249.
点击复制

青藏高原两种典型植物根系抗拉特性与其微观结构的关系

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 25 期数: 2018年02期 页码: 240-249 栏目: 出版日期: 2018-04-03
Title:
Relationship Between Tensile Properties and Microstructure of Two Typical Plant Roots in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau
作者:
李可1, 朱海丽1,2, 宋路1, 李国荣1,2, 谢彬山1, 李本峰1
1. 青海大学 地质工程系, 西宁 810016;
2. 青藏高原北缘新生代资源环境重点实验室, 西宁 810016
Author(s):
LI Ke1, ZHU Haili1,2, SONG Lu1, LI Guorong1,2, XIE Binshan1, LI Benfeng1
1. Department of Geological Engineering, Qinghai University, Xining 810016, China;
2. Key Lab of Cenozoic Resource & Environment in North Margin of the Tibetan Plateau, Xining 810016, China
关键词:
抗拉强度; 标距; 拉伸速率; 应力-应变曲线; 电镜扫描
Keywords:
tensile strength; gauge length; stretching rate; stress-strain curve; SEM
分类号:
S718
摘要:
为研究青藏高原东部边坡、路堑两种常见的护坡植物根系抗拉特性及其与根系微观结构的关系，对灌木植物柠条锦鸡儿和草本植物草地早熟禾根系进行了室内单根拉伸试验和根系断面电镜扫描试验。试验结果显示：两种植物根系抗拉力随着根径的增大呈幂函数增大；根系抗拉强度随根径的增大呈幂函数或指数函数减小。草地早熟禾根系平均抗拉力在标距为40 mm时达到最大值；柠条锦鸡儿根系平均抗拉力在标距为80 mm时达到最大值；当拉伸速率为3 mm/min时，两种植物根系抗拉力和抗拉强度最大，两种植物在拉伸速率为5 mm/min和10 mm/min时，其抗拉强度变化不明显。两种植物单根拉伸应力-应变曲线呈单峰曲线，无明显的颈缩现象，具有弹塑性材料特点，且根径较小的草本植物草地早熟禾根系表现出具有较高的抗拉强度、较大的延伸性能。根系断面显微结构中，柠条锦鸡儿和草地早熟禾根系横断面的管孔孔径随着拉伸速率的增大逐渐减小，减小幅度依次为91.25%，45.41%，表皮破坏程度也相应的减弱。根系的拉伸横断面表皮撕裂程度及表皮延长程度随拉伸速率、拉伸标距的增大而减小。
Abstract:
In order to study relationship between the tensile properties of root system and the root microstructure of two common slope protection vegetations in the slope and road cutting of eastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, the single root tensile test and SEM test of Caragana korshinskii Kom. and Poa pratensis L. were carried out to study the tensile properties of root system and its relationship with the microstructure. The results showed that the root tensile resistances of the two plants increase exponentially with the increase of diameter; the tensile strength of roots decreases with the increase follows the diameter as a power function or an exponential function. The average tensile resistance of Poa pratensis L. root reaches its maximum at the 40 mm gauge length, while the average tensile resistance of Caragana korshinskii Kom. root reaches its maximum when the gauge length distance is 80 mm; at different stretching rates, the tensile resistance and tensile strength of two kinds of plant roots reach the maximum under the stretching rate of 3 mm/min, and the tensile strength of two plants under the stretching rate of 5 mm/min and 10 mm/min does not change significantly. The stress-strain curve of two plants shows the single-peak curve without obvious necking phenomenon, and it has the characteristics of elastic-plastic material. The herbs Poa pratensis L. roots with smaller diameter possesses higher tensile strength and greater extension properties. By observing the microscopic structure, the pore diameter of the cross sections of Caragana korshinskii Kom. and Poa pratensis L. decrease with the increase of the stretching rate, the decrease ranges are 91.25% and 45.41%, respectively, and the extent of epidermal destruction accordingly decreases. The extent of epidermal tear and the extent of epidermal elongation in tensile cross section decrease with the increase of stretching rate and elongation.

参考文献/References:

[1] Wu T H, McKinnell W P Ⅲ, Swanston D N. Strength of tree roots and landslides on Prince of Wales Island, Alaska[J]. Canadian Geotech Journal, 1979,16(1):19-33.
[2] Waldron L J, Dakessian S. Soil reinforcement by roots:Calculation of increased soil shear strength from root properties[J]. Soil Science, 1981,132(6):427-435.
[3] 赵玉娇,胡夏嵩,刘昌义,等.寒旱环境植物根系增强边坡土体抗剪强度试验研究[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(4):212-220.
[4] 栗岳洲,付江涛,余冬梅,等.寒旱环境盐生植物根系固土护坡力学效应及其最优含根量探讨[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2015,34(7):1370-1383.
[5] 乔娜,余芹芹,卢海静,等.寒旱环境植物护坡力学效应与根系化学成分响应[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(3):108-113.
[6] 李刚,赵祥,张宾宾,等.不同株高的柠条生物量分配格局及其估测模型构建[J].草地学报,2014,22(4):769-775.
[7] 贺玺琳,杨慧茹,马玉寿,等.青海草地早熟禾植物量生长动态研究[J].青海畜牧兽医杂志,2016,46(1):13-16.
[8] 熊燕梅,夏汉平,李志安,等.植物根系固坡抗蚀的效应与机理研究进展[J].应用生态学报.2007,18(4):895-904.
[9] 胡夏嵩,李国荣,朱海丽,等.寒旱环境灌木植物根-土相互作用及其护坡力学效应[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2009,28(3):613-620.
[10] 朱海丽,胡夏嵩,毛小青,等.青藏高原黄土区护坡灌木植物根系力学特性研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2008,27(2):3445-3452.
[11] 李臻,余芹芹,杨占风,等.西宁盆地两种灌木植物原位拉拔试验及其护坡效应[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(3):206-209.
[12] Fung Y C. Biomechanics:Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues[M]. Germany:Springer-Verlag, 1993.
[13] 李有芳,刘静,张欣,等.4种植物生长旺盛期根系易受损的外力类型研究[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(6):339-344.
[14] Maeglin R R. National variation of tissue proportions and vessel and fiber length in mature northern red oak[J]. Silvae Genetica, 1976,25(3/4):122-126.
[15] 朱海丽,胡夏嵩,毛小青,等.护坡植物根系力学特性与其解剖结构关系[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(5):40-46.
[16] 蒋坤云,陈丽华,盖小刚,等.华北护坡阔叶树种根系抗拉性能与其微观结构的关系[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(3):115-123.
[17] 蒋坤云,陈丽华,杨苑君,等.华北油松、落叶松根系抗拉强度与其微观结构的相关性研究[J].水土保持学报,2014,27(2):8-12.
[18] 郭维俊,黄高宝,王芬娥,等.小麦根系力学性能及微观结构研究[J].农业机械学报,2010,41(1):92-95.
[19] 唐朝生,施斌,顾凯.纤维加筋土中筋/土界面相互作用的微观研究[J].工程地质学报,2011,19(4):610-615.
[20] 杨涛,周德培,雷承第,等.柔性防护边坡的稳定性分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2006,25(2):294-298.
[21] 周朔.林木根系拉伸力学特性研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2011.
[22] 胡敏,李为萍,史海滨,等.布根方式及根系径级对根土复合体抗剪性能的影响[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(1):42-44.
[23] 吕春娟,陈丽华,周硕,等.不同乔木根系的抗拉力学特性[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(1):329-335.
[24] Bischetti G B, Chiaradia E A, Simonato T, et al. Root strength and root area ratio of forest species in Lombardy(Northern Italy)[J]. Plant and Soil, 2005,278(1):11-22.
[25] 陆桂红,欧国强,杨顺,等.泥石流源区典型草本植物根系抗拉试验[J].山地学报,2014,32(6):725-731.
[26] 张兴玲,胡夏嵩,毛小青,等.青藏高原东北部黄土区护坡灌木柠条锦鸡儿根系拉拔摩擦试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2011,30(S2):3739-3745.
[27] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.金属材料拉伸试验第1部分:室温试验方法GB/T288.1-2010[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2010.
[28] 陈世鐄.中国北方草地植物根系[M].长春:吉林大学出版社,2001.

相似文献/References:

[1]乔娜,余芹芹,卢海静,等.寒旱环境植物护坡力学效应与根系化学成分响应[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(03):108.
　QIAO Na,YU Qin-qin,LU Hai-jing,et al.Research on Mechanical Effects of the Vegetation on Slope Protection and Response of Root Chemical Compositions in Cold and Arid Environment[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(02):108.
[2]程洪,颜传盛,李建庆,等.草本植物根系网的固土机制模式与力学试验研究[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(01):62.
　CHENG Hong,YAN Chuan-sheng,LI Jian-qing,et al.An Experimental Study on Mechanic Performance and Mechanism of Soil-reinforcement by Herb Root System[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(02):62.
[3]杨永红,刘淑珍,王成华,等.浅层滑坡生物治理中的乔木根系抗拉实验研究[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(01):138.
　YANG Yong-hong,LIU Shu-zhen,WANG Cheng-hua,et al.A Study of Tensile Strength Tests of Arborous Species Root System in Forest Engineering Technique of Shallow Landslide[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(02):138.
[4]苏雪萌,刘俊娥,周正朝,等.黄土丘陵区不同植物根系抗拉力学特性[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(03):259.
　SU Xuemeng,LIU June,ZHOU Zhengchao,et al.Root Tensile and Mechanical Properties of Three Typical Plants in the Loess Hilly Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(02):259.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2017-6-6;改回日期:2017-7-15。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金（41762023，41302258，41662023）；青海省科技厅应用基础研究项目（2017-ZJ-776）
作者简介:李可(1992-),男,甘肃平凉人,硕士研究生,研究方向为地质灾害及其防治。E-mail:liken2017@163.com
通讯作者:朱海丽(1977-),女,江苏溧阳人,副教授,主要从事植被护坡与滨河生态学研究。E-mail:qdzhuhaili@163.com

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01