[1]邝佛缘,陈美球,李志朋,等.农户生态环境认知与保护行为的差异分析——以农药化肥使用为例[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(01):321-326.
　KUANG Foyuan,CHEN Meiqiu,LI Zhipeng,et al.Analysis on the Difference Between Farmers’ Ecological Environment Cognition and Protective Behavior Based on Using Pesticide and Chemical Fertilizer[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(01):321-326.
点击复制

农户生态环境认知与保护行为的差异分析——以农药化肥使用为例

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 25 期数: 2018年01期 页码: 321-326 栏目: 出版日期: 2018-02-28
Title:
Analysis on the Difference Between Farmers’ Ecological Environment Cognition and Protective Behavior Based on Using Pesticide and Chemical Fertilizer
作者:
邝佛缘1, 陈美球1, 李志朋1,2, 彭欣欣1, 刘静1, 刘洋洋1
1. 江西农业大学 农村土地资源利用与保护研究中心/江西省鄱阳湖流域农业资源与生态重点实验室, 南昌 330045;
2. 江西省国土资源勘测规划院, 南昌 330045
Author(s):
KUANG Foyuan1, CHEN Meiqiu1, LI Zhipeng1,2, PENG Xinxin1, LIU Jing1, LIU Yangyang1
1. Research Center on Rural Land Resources Use and Protection, Key Laboratory of Poyang Lake Basin Agricultural Resources and Ecology, Jiangxi Agriculture University, Nanchang 330045, China;
2. Jiangxi Land and Resources Survey and Planning Institute, Nanchang 330045, China
关键词:
农户; 农药化肥; 生态环境认知; 保护行为; 差异分析; 江西省
Keywords:
farmers; pesticide and chemical fertilizer; ecological environment cognition; protective behavior; difference analysis; Jiangxi Province
分类号:
F323.22
摘要:
农户不合理使用农药化肥严重威胁着我国农业生态环境的健康发展，探究农户生态环境认知与保护行为之间的内部关系，对于制定相应的调控措施具有积极的参考价值。利用江西省2 028份农户调查数据，运用增强回归树（BRT）模型分析农户生态环境认知和保护行为的差异性。结果表明：总体上，农户生态环境认知水平较高，但保护行为程度较差，表明农户生态环境认知并不必然导致保护行为，二者之间不存在很强的因果关系；究其原因是农户生态环境认知与其保护行为的影响因素和影响程度不同。影响认知的主要因素依次为实际耕种面积、年龄和外出务工比重，影响行为的则依次为年龄、实际耕种面积和文化程度。年龄、家庭年收入和外出务工比重三个指标对农户生态环境的认知和保护行为的影响方向和程度的差异性在一定程度上解释了认知和行为的不一致性。
Abstract:
The unreasonable use of pesticides and fertilizers by farmers seriously threatens the healthy development of agricultural ecological environment in China. It has a positive referenced value for formulating corresponding control measures to explore the internal relations of farmers’ ecological environment cognition and environmental behavior. Based on the survey data of 2 028 farmers in Jiangxi Province, we used the boosted regression tree (BRT) model to analyze the differences of farmers’ ecological environment cognition and environmental behavior. The results showed that:on the whole, the cognition level of farmers’ ecological environment is higher, but the degree of environmental behavior is poor, which indicates that farmers’ ecological environment cognition and environmental behavior are obviously different. There is no causal relationship. The reason is that the influence factors and influence degree of farmer’s ecological environment cognition and protection behavior are different. The main factors affecting cognition are in the order:cultivated area, age and proportion of migrant workers, the factors affecting the behavior are in the sequence:age, cultivated area and culture degree. The variables of age, family annual income, and the proportion of migrant workers had different effects on ecological environment cognition and environmental behavior, and this explained the inconsistency to some extent.

参考文献/References:

[1] 辛继红,莫利加.农业生态环境保护及对策[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(6):276-279.
[2] 王建兵,程磊.农业面源污染现状分析[J].江西农业大学学报:社会科学版,2008(3):35-39.
[3] Cabrera L, Costa F P, Primel E G. Risk estimate of water contamination by pesticide in south of Brazil[J]. Química Nova, 2008,31(8):1982-1986.
[4] Hunke P, Mueller E N, Schröder B, et al. The Brazilian Cerrado:Assessment of water and soil degradation in catchments under intensive agricultural use[J]. Ecohydrology, 2015,8(6):1154-1180.
[5] 侯俊东,吕军,尹伟峰.农户经营行为对农村生态环境影响研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2012,22(3):26-31.
[6] 宋言奇.发达地区农民环境意识调查分析:以苏州市714个样本为例[J].中国农村经济,2010(1):53-62,73.
[7] 陈梦娇,陈美球,鲁燕飞,等.鄱阳湖区农户农业面源污染认知及其影响因素分析[J].土地经济研究,2016,(1):85-97.
[8] 田云,张俊飚,何可,等.农户农业低碳生产行为及其影响因素分析:以化肥施用和农药使用为例[J].中国农村观察,2015(4):61-70.
[9] 褚彩虹,冯淑怡,张蔚文.农户采用环境友好型农业技术行为的实证分析:以有机肥与测土配方施肥技术为例[J].中国农村经济,2012(3):68-77.
[10] 樊翔,张军,王红,等.农户禀赋对农户低碳农业生产行为的影响:基于山东省大盛镇农户调查[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(1):265-271.
[11] Cooke R, Sheeran P. Moderation of cognition-intention and cognition-behaviour relations:a meta-analysis of properties of variables from the theory of planned behavior[J]. British Journal of Social Psychology, 2004,43(2):159-186.
[12] 姚柳杨,赵敏娟,徐涛.经济理性还是生态理性、农户耕地保护的行为逻辑研究[J].南京农业大学学报:社会科学版,2016,16(5):86-95,156.
[13] 王常伟,顾海英.农户环境认知、行为决策及其一致性检验:基于江苏农户调查的实证分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2012,21(10):1204-1208.
[14] Chen M Q, Lu Y F, Ling L, et al. Drivers of changes in ecosystem service values in Ganjiang upstream watershed[J]. Land Use Policy, 2015,47:247-252.
[15] 尹才,刘淼,孙凤云,等.基于增强回归树的流域非点源污染影响因子分析[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(3):911-919.
[16] Elith J, Leathwick J R, Hastie T. A working guide to boosted regression trees. Journal of Animal Ecology,2008,77(4):802-813.

相似文献/References:

[1]卢志伟,王继军.黄土高原沟壑区农户经济分析[J].水土保持研究,1992,(02):117.
　Lu Zhiwei,Wang Jijun.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF PEASANT HOUSEHOLD IN THE HILLY-GULLIED AREA OF THE LOESS PLATEAU[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1992,(01):117.
[2]丛日晨,张建新,岳文斌.黄土残塬区不同农户庭院生态经济模式评价研究[J].水土保持研究,2000,7(04):92.
　CONG Richen,ZHANG Jianxin,YUE Wenbin.Research on the Ecotone economic Mode Estimation of the Different Peasant Household in the Loess Broken Plateau Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2000,7(01):92.
[3]韩书成,谢永生,郝明德,等.不同类型农户土地投入行为差异研究[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(05):83.
　HAN Shu-cheng,XIE Yong-sheng,HAO Ming-de,et al.Research on the Difference of Investment Behavior of Different Farm Household Type[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(01):83.
[4]彭浩.黑河流域退耕还林(草)工程社会评价调查研究——以甘肃省张掖市为例[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(06):204.
　PENG Hao.Research on Social Evaluation of Turning the Cultivated Land into Forests or Grasslands Project in Heihe River Basin——Take Zhangye Prefecture in Gansu Province as an Example[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(01):204.
[5]王峰,温学飞,胡建军.城西滩生态农业农户发展经营模式研究[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(06):51.
　WANG Feng,WEN Xue-fei,HU Jian-jun.Household Development Model of Ecological Agriculture in Chengxitan[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(01):51.
[6]吕品,王秀兰,文高辉.城乡建设用地增减挂钩项目农户参与意愿及其影响因素研究[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(01):249.
　Lü Pin,WANG Xiulan,WEN Gaohui.Factors Influencing Rural Households’ Participation Willingness in Linkage Between Urban-Land Taking and Rural-Land Giving Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(01):249.
[7]冉清红,岳云华,杨玲,等.西部农户耕地保护生态外部性价值分析与启示[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(02):348.
　RAN Qinghong,YUE Yunhua,YANG Ling,et al.Positive Externality Value Analysis on the Cultivated Land Protection of Farmers in China Western Provinces and the Enlightenment[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(01):348.
[8]孙在伟,王继军,郭满才.县南沟流域农户生态经济行为影响要素分析[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(03):253.
　SUN Zaiwei,WANG Jijun,GUO Mancai.Analysis of the Influence Factors of Eco-Economic Behavior of Farmers in Xiannangou Watershed[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(01):253.
[9]成思敏,王继军,李茂森,等.退耕区农户生计策略与农业产业-资源系统耦合机制的演化过程分析——以纸坊沟流域为例[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(05):242.
　CHENG Simin,WANG Jijun,LI Maosen,et al.Analysis on the Evolutionary Process of Farmers’ Livelihood Strategy and the Agricultural Industry-Resources System Coupling Mechanism in De-Farming Regions——A Case Study of Zhifanggou Watershed[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(01):242.
[10]温丹,陈美球,邝佛缘,等.资源禀赋对农户生态耕种行为决策的影响分析[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(02):320.
　WEN Dan,CHEN Meiqiu,KUANG Foyuan,et al.Impact of Resources Endowment on Farmers Ecological Farming Behavioral Decision[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(01):320.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2017-5-22;改回日期:2017-6-7。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金“生计分化中农户农业面源污染防控行为及其调控对策研究——以江西省为例”（71473112）；江西省哲学社会科学重点研究基地项目（15SKJD13）；江西现代农业及其优势产业可持续发展的决策支持协同创新中心项目（2015WT05）；江西省高校哲学社会科学创新团队建设项目
作者简介:邝佛缘(1991-),男,江西寻乌人,硕士研究生,研究方向为土地资源管理。E-mail:kfy5913@163.com
通讯作者:陈美球(1967-),男,江西石城人,博士,教授,博导,主要从事土地资源管理等方面研究。E-mail:cmq12@263.net

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01