WANG Shengli,LIU Wei,ZHANG Lianpeng,et al.Adaptive Surface Modeling of Soil Total Potassium Content Supported by the Environment Variables—A Case Study in Typical Areas of Qinghai Lake Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(01):132-138.
地学环境变量支持的土壤全钾含量自适应曲面建模——以青海湖流域典型地区为例
- Title:
- Adaptive Surface Modeling of Soil Total Potassium Content Supported by the Environment Variables—A Case Study in Typical Areas of Qinghai Lake Basin
- Keywords:
- soil total potassium content; adaptive surface modeling; spatial interpolation; QingHai Lake Basin; environment variables
- 分类号:
- TP79;G623.45
- 摘要:
- 土壤属性空间分布受地学环境要素影响，空间分异特征十分明显，单一的全局插值模型在应用中常受到一定条件的限制。对复杂地貌类型区土壤属性插值所面临的空间不连续、全局插值模型精度有限以及适应性差的缺点，提出了一种融合地学环境信息的土壤属性自适应曲面建模方法（Adaptive surface modeling for soil properties，ASM-SP）。利用2013年采集的110个样点数据，以土壤全钾含量为例，利用ASM-SP、普通克里格法（Ordinary Kriging，OK）、回归克里格法（Regression Kriging，RK）、地理加权回归克里格法（Geographically Weighted Regression Kriging，GWRK）和协同克里格（Ordinary Co-Kriging，OCK）5种插值方法，分别模拟了青海湖流域典型地区土壤全钾含量的空间分布。采用平均误差（Mean Error，ME）、平均相对误差（Mean Relative Error，MRE）、均方根误差（Root Mean Square Error，RMSE）、准确度（Accuracy，AC）、相关系数、回归系数和决定系数7类指标系统评价不同插值方法的预测效果。结果表明：（1）利用常规插值（OK）得到的插值曲面较为平滑，具有弱“牛眼”效应，在刻画土壤全钾含量的空间变异性方面存在明显不足，精度有待提高。（2）在融合地学环境信息的插值方法中，RK，OCK，GWRK和ASM-SP模拟精度较OK有不同程度提高，其中ASM-SP在刻画土壤全钾含量的空间变异和局部细节信息方面表现突出，精度较其他插值方法有较大程度提高，其准确度较OK，RK，GWRK和OCK分别提高9.27%，6.29%，2.66%和7.74%。ASM-SP尤其适合复杂地貌类型区，因其考虑了地学环境变量与土壤属性的非线性关系，并融合了多个模型的适应性优势，其在刻画土壤属性空间分异的复杂性方面也更加符合实际情况，为土壤属性的空间模拟提供了新思路。
- Abstract:
- The single global interpolation model is limited because of the complexity of spatial distribution of soil properties. The spatial discontinuity often causes a poor accuracy when the single model is used for surface modeling of soil properties faces in complex geomorphic area. This paper presented an adaptive method for surface modeling of soil properties supported by the environment variables (ASM-SP). Four methods, including Ordinary Kriging method (OK), Regression Kriging method (RK), Geographically Weighted Regression Kriging method (GWRK), Ordinary Co-Kriging method (OCK), were used to validate the proposed method. We selected the Qinghai Lake Basin, a typical complex geomorphic area, as the study area. Based on the 110 topsoil samples collected in 2013, the five methods were used to predict the spatial distribution of soil total potassium content, respectively. The mean error (ME), mean relative error (MRE), root mean square error (RMSE), accuracy (AC), correlation coefficient, regression coefficient and adjust coefficient were served as the evaluation indicators. The results show that:(1) the OK interpolation result is spatially smooth and has a weak bull’s-eye effect, it is an obvious deficiency in depicting spatial variability of soil total potassium content, and the accuracy also needs to be improved; (2) ASM-SP is the best method for predicting soil total potassium content with higher accuracy in this study. The result presents more details than other in the abrupt boundary, which can make the result consistent with the true geo-environmental variables. It not only considers the nonlinear relationship between geo-environment variables and soil properties, but also adaptively combines the advantages of multiple models. Compared with OK, RK, GWRK and OCK, the accuracy of ASM-SP increased by 9.27%, 6.29%, 2.66% and 7.74%, respectively. Therefore, the proposed method could provide significant reference for enriching the surface modelling theory and techniques.
参考文献/References:
[1] 赵其国.土壤科学发展的战略思考[J].土壤,2009,41(5):681-688.
[2] 黄文忠.宜宾市土壤钾素的空间变异特征及影响因素研究[D].四川雅安:四川农业大学,2010.
[3] 郭旭东,傅伯杰,马克明.基于GIS和地统计学的土壤养分空间变异特征研究[J].应用生态学报,2000,11(4):557-563.
[4] 王彩绒,吕家珑,胡正义,等.太湖流域典型蔬菜地土壤氮磷钾养分空间变异性及分布规律[J].中国农学通报,2005,21(8):238-242.
[5] 吴春生,黄翀,刘高焕,等.黄河三角洲土壤含盐量空间预测方法研究[J].资源科学,2016,38(4):704-713.
[6] Laslett G M, McBratney A B, Pahl P J, et al. Comparison of several spatial prediction methods for soil pH[J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 1987, 38(2):325-341.
[7] Gotway C A, Ferguson R B, Hergert G W, et al. Comparison of kriging and inverse-distance methods for mapping soil parameters[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1996, 60(4):1237-1247.
[8] 龙军,张黎明,沈金泉,等.复杂地貌类型区耕地土壤有机质空间插值方法研究[J].土壤学报,2014,51(6):1270-1281.
[9] 文雯,周宝同,汪亚峰,等.基于辅助环境变量的土壤有机碳空间插值:以黄土丘陵区小流域为例[J].生态学报,2013,33(19):6389-6397.
[10] 王坷,Bailey.土壤钾素空间变异性和空间插值方法的比较研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2000,6(3):318-322.
[11] 马成霞,丁建丽,王璐,等.绿洲土壤表层含盐量空间变异分析的插值方法研究[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(4):317-320.
[12] Panagopoulos T, Jesus J, Antunes M, et al. Analysis of spatial interpolation for optimising management of a salinized field cultivated with lettuce[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 2006,24(1):1-10.
[13] 董志南,郑拴宁,赵会兵,等.基于空间插值的风场模拟方法比较分析[J].地球信息科学学报,2015,17(1):37-44.
[14] 张文龙,李玉环,姬祥.基于地统计学的耕层土壤有机质空间变异及不同插值模型的比较[J].中国农学通报,2011,27(6):256-260.
[15] 谢云峰,陈同斌,雷梅,等.空间插值模型对土壤Cd污染评价结果的影响[J].环境科学学报,2010,30(4):847-854.
[16] 赵巧丽,郑国清,冯晓,等.河南省安阳县三种土壤全氮含量空间插值方法的比较分析[J].土壤通报,2012,43(5):1162-1166.
[17] 马静,张仁陟,陈利.耕地地力评价中土壤养分的空间插值方法比较研究:以会宁县土壤速效钾为例[J].安徽农学通报,2011,17(17):91-93.
[18] 史文娇,刘纪远,杜正平,等.基于地学信息的土壤属性高精度曲面建模[J].地理学报,2011,66(11):1574-1581.
[19] 刘劲松,陈辉,杨彬云,等.河北省年均降水量插值方法比较[J].生态学报,2009,29(7):3493-3500.
[20] 林琳,李纯厚,戴明,等.海洋浮游植物丰度的空间插值优化[J].生态学报,2007,27(7):2880-2888.
[21] Triantafilis J, Odeh I O A, Mcbratney A B. Five Geostatistical Models to Predict Soil Salinity From Electromagnetic Induction Data Across Irrigated Cotton[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2001,65(3):869-878.
[22] Kuriakose S L, Devkota S, Rossiter D G, et al. Prediction of soil depth using environmental variables in an anthropogenic landscape:A case study in the Western Ghats of Kerala, India[J]. Catena, 2009,79(1):27-38.
[23] 杨琳,朱阿兴,秦承志,等.运用模糊隶属度进行土壤属性制图的研究:以黑龙江鹤山农场研究区为例[J].土壤学报,2009,46(1):9-15.
[24] 郭龙,张海涛,陈家赢,等.基于协同克里格插值和地理加权回归模型的土壤属性空间预测比较[J].土壤学报,2012,49(5):1037-1042.
[25] 杨顺华,张海涛,郭龙,等.基于回归和地理加权回归Kriging的土壤有机质空间插值[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(6):1649-1656.
[26] 范晓梅,刘高焕,刘红光.基于Kriging和Cokriging方法的黄河三角洲土壤盐渍化评价[J].资源科学,2014,36(2):321-327.
[27] 易湘生,李国胜,尹衍雨,等.土壤厚度的空间插值方法比较:以青海三江源地区为例[J].地理研究,2012,31(10):1793-1805.
[28] 杨琳,朱阿兴,张淑杰,等.土壤制图中多等级代表性采样与分层随机采样的对比研究[J].土壤学报,2015,52(1):28-37.
[29] Zhang H, Lu L, Liu Y, et al. Spatial sampling strategies for the effect of interpolation accuracy[J]. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 2015,4(4):2742-2768.
[30] 史文娇,岳天祥,石晓丽,等.土壤连续属性空间插值方法及其精度的研究进展[J].自然资源学报,2012,27(1):163-175.
[31] 杨雨亭,尚松,浩李超.土壤水分空间插值的克里金平滑效应修正方法[J].水科学进展,2010,21(2):208-213.
[32] 王绍强,朱松丽,周成虎.中国土壤土层厚度的空间变异性特征[J].地理研究,2001,20(2):161-169.
[33] 范胜龙,黄炎和,林金石.表征土壤有机碳区域分布的优化空间插值模型研究:以福建省龙海市为例[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(6):1-5.
[34] Liu W, Du P, Zhao Z, et al. An adaptive weighting algorithm for interpolating the soil potassium content[J]. Scientific Reports, 2016,6:23889.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2017-1-5;改回日期:2017-3-14。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金“集成学习支持的复杂地貌类型区土壤厚度自适应曲面建模——以青海湖流域典型地区为例”（41601405）
作者简介:王胜利(1992-),男,河南平顶山人,硕士研究生,研究方向为资源环境遥感与曲面建模。E-mail:wsli586@163.com
通讯作者:刘伟(1983-),男,安徽萧县人,博士,副教授,研究方向为资源数据模拟以及GIS开发与应用。E-mail:grid_gis@126.com