[1]李倩,石磊,高甲荣,等.火烧沟“参与式”小流域治理的满意度分析[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(05):120-125.
　LI Qian,SHI Lei,GAO Jiarong,et al.Analysis on Satisfaction of Participatory Management in Huoshaogou Watershed[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(05):120-125.
点击复制

火烧沟“参与式”小流域治理的满意度分析

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 24 期数: 2017年05期 页码: 120-125 栏目: 出版日期: 2017-10-28
Title:
Analysis on Satisfaction of Participatory Management in Huoshaogou Watershed
作者:
李倩1, 石磊2, 高甲荣1, 马岚1, 刘珂2, 康烨1, 张栋1, 王舒1, 姚占军1
1. 北京林业大学, 水土保持与荒漠化防治教育部重点实验室, 北京 100083;
2. 西宁防洪及流域管理利用世行贷款项目建设办公室, 西宁 810001
Author(s):
LI Qian1, SHI Lei2, GAO Jiarong1, MA Lan1, LIU Ke2, KANG Ye1, ZHANG Dong1, WANG Shu1, YAO Zhanjun1
1. Key Laboratory of Soil & Water Conservation and Desertification Combating, Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China;
2. Xining Municipal Project Management Office, Xining 810001, China
关键词:
火烧沟; “参与式”小流域; 满意度调查; 相关性分析; 主成分分析
Keywords:
Huoshaogou watershed; participatory small watershed; satisfaction survey; correlation analysis; principal component analysis
分类号:
S157
摘要:
西宁市火烧沟自2006年实施“参与式”小流域治理以来，生态环境水平和社会经济水平都得到很大提高，研究通过运用结构访谈和半结构访谈方式对农户进行“参与式”小流域治理水土保持措施实施后的满意度调查，并结合火烧沟“参与式”小流域治理效果以及对治理后进行的效益评价得到火烧沟小流域治理的经验和教训。调查结果表明：农户对项目措施满意度和对组织管理的满意度总体评价都很高。在项目措施中，水保林满意度和重要性都呈最高水平，淤地坝重要性较高农户满意度却较低，而谷坊建设与总满意度相关性最强，硬化道路与总满意度相关性最弱。在组织管理满意度评价中，决策参与和对区域社会经济影响满意度和重要性都呈较高水平，项目管理重要性水平较高，农户满意度却较低，社区监测方式与社区采购等与总满意度之间的相关性最强，决策参与与总满意度相关性最弱。参与式小流域治理措施实施后区域整体生态环境和农民生活水平都得到改善和提高，但是在措施实施和后期管理的过程中仍然存在很多不足，很多方面需要加强和进一步改善。
Abstract:
Since participatory management was implemented in Huoshaogou Catchment of Xining in 2006, the ecological environment and social economy have been greatly improved. Through structural interview and semi structural interview, survey on farmers’ satisfaction about implementation of participatory catchment management was carried out. Experiences and lessens on catchment management were obtained with respect to participatory management effect in Huoshaogou Catchment. The survey results show that farmers’ satisfaction level on project measures and organizational management is high. Forest measure on soil and water conservation has the highest level of satisfaction and the weight among the project measures. Warp land dam measure has higher weight but lower average farmers’ satisfaction. And the total satisfaction has the greatest correlation with check dam construction measure and least correlation with road hardening. In the organizational management, decision-making participation has the highest level of satisfaction and the weight, the project management has higher weight but lower average farmers’ satisfaction. And total satisfaction has the greatest correlation with community monitoring and community purchase, and least correlation with decision participation. Participatory management improves local farmers’ income and ecologic environment. But there are still many problems in the process of measure implementation and later period management, and many aspects need to be further improved and strengthened.

参考文献/References:

[1] 王还珠.参与式小流域综合管理方法初探[J].中国水土保持,2007(12):31-32.
[2] 宋济舟.参与式理念在胡基沟小流域综合治理中的应用[J].甘肃水利水电技术,2010,46(3):64-65.
[3] 熊晓波,梁剑辉,董仁才,等.参与式方法在小流域治理中的应用[J].中国水土保持科学,2009,7(3):108-113.
[4] 刘存国,李文斌.平凉市实施参与式小流域规划的体会[J].中国水土保持,2007(7):48-49.
[5] 谢艳芳,杜卿,贺林.参与式方法和工具在小流域规划中的应用：以英国赠款小流域治理管理项目为例[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(5):214-26.
[6] 谢艳芳,贺林,杜卿. CWMP示范小流域的选择和参与式小流域规划过程[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(5):253-255.
[7] Burroughs R. When stakeholders choose: process, knowledge, and motivation in water quality decisions[J]. Society & Natural Resources, 1999,12(8):797-809.
[8] Norgaard R B. Environmental science as a social process[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 1992,20:95-110.
[9] 陈竹,黄林素,姚富强.参与式小流域治理农户水土保持行为调查[J].中国水土保持,2013(9):19-22.
[10] 翟文侠,黄贤金.农户水土保持行为机理:研究进展与分析框架[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(6):108-112.
[11] 连纲,郭旭东,傅伯杰,等.基于参与性调查的农户对退耕政策及生态环境的认知与响应[J].生态学报,2005,25(7):1741-1747.
[12] 康烨.农户满意度对参与式小流域治理的影响评估[D].北京:北京林业大学,2016.
[13] 郭瑞香,蒋爱群,何晓军.参与式理论和参与式农村评估方法在澳援项目中的应用[J].河北水利,2004(9):10-11.
[14] 张志,朱清科,朱金兆,等.参与式农村评估(PRA)在流域景观格局研究中的应用:以晋西黄土区吉县蔡家川为例[J].中国水土保持科学,2005,3(1):25-31.
[15] 李明灌.参与式方法在社区扶贫发展项目设计中的应用及其效果评价[D].北京:中国农业大学,2004.

相似文献/References:

[1]常华进,曹广超,陈克龙.西宁火烧沟下游表层泥质沉积物中重金属含量及评价[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(05):247.
　CHANG Hua-jin,CAO Guang-chao,CHEN Ke-long.Concentration and Assessment of Heavy Metals in Surface Sediment in the Lower Reaches of Huoshaogou, Xi’ning City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(05):247.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2016-08-08;改回日期:2016-09-04。
基金项目:西宁防洪及流域管理利用世行贷款项目建设办公室“参与式”小流域治理在水土保持机制中的作用评估与推广（XN-C-2012-04）
作者简介:李倩(1992-),女,河北唐山人,硕士研究生,研究方向:水土保持与流域管理。E-mail:769365693@qq.com
通讯作者:马岚(1981-),女,陕西汉中人,博士研究生,副教授,主要研究方向:水土保持与流域管理。E-mail:mlpcz@sina.com.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01