[1]张超,陈国建,李春娟,等.基于USLE模型的重庆生态涵养发展区土壤侵蚀量估算[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(03):33-38.
　ZHANG Chao,CHEN Guojian,LI Chunjuan,et al.Estimate of Soil Erosion Amount of the Ecological Conservation Development Area in Chongqing Based on the USLE Model[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(03):33-38.
点击复制

基于USLE模型的重庆生态涵养发展区土壤侵蚀量估算

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 24 期数: 2017年03期 页码: 33-38 栏目: 出版日期: 2017-06-28
Title:
Estimate of Soil Erosion Amount of the Ecological Conservation Development Area in Chongqing Based on the USLE Model
作者:
张超1, 陈国建1,2, 李春娟1, 肖卓勇1, 李春利1, 李娟娟1, 廖良宇1
1. 重庆师范大学 地理与旅游学院, 重庆 400047;
2. 三峡库区地表过程与环境遥感重庆市重点实验室, 重庆 400047
Author(s):
ZHANG Chao1, CHEN Guojian1,2, LI Chunjuan1, XIAO Zhuoyong1, LI Chunli1, LI Juanjuan1, LIAO Liangyu1
1. Geography and Tourism College, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 400047, China;
2. Chongqing Key Laboratory of Surface Processes and Environmental Remote Sensing in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, Chongqing 400047, China
关键词:
土壤侵蚀量; USLE模型; 渝东北; 生态涵养发展区
Keywords:
soil erosion amount; USLE model; northeast of Chongqing; ecological conservation development area
分类号:
S157.1
摘要:
利用USLE模型估算渝东北生态涵养发展区土壤侵蚀量，并对研究区土壤侵蚀强度进行分级，以此为基础进一步分析不同降雨侵蚀力、坡度、土壤类型下的土壤侵蚀强度分布特征。结果表明：本研究区土壤侵蚀量大致呈东北向西南递减的趋势，东部山地土壤受侵蚀最严重，西部山间丘陵地带土壤侵蚀量相对较小，研究区平均土壤侵蚀模数为30.15 t/（hm2·a），土壤侵蚀量为10 220.85万t/a。研究区各区县土壤侵蚀分布情况可划分为三类：（1） 重点预防保护区。土壤侵蚀以微度和轻度侵蚀为主，林草覆盖度较高，但有水土流失加剧的危险，代表区县是忠县、梁平、垫江；（2） 重点监督区。土壤侵蚀以中度和强度侵蚀为主，土壤侵蚀相对严重，代表区县为云阳、万州、巫山、奉节、丰都；（3） 重点治理区。土壤侵蚀以极强度和剧烈侵蚀为主，土壤侵蚀最严重，代表区县为巫溪、开县、城口。降雨侵蚀力为3 000~4 000 （MJ·mm）/（hm2·h·a），坡度在25°以上，土壤为石灰土、紫色土或黄褐土的地区，土壤侵蚀以强度、极强度和剧烈侵蚀为主，是水土流失治理的重点。
Abstract:
USLE model was used to estimate soil erosion in the Ecological Conservation Development Area in Chongqing, and the soil erosion intensity of this area was classified according to criterion. The distribution characteristics of soil erosion intensity for different rainfall erosion forces, slope grades and soil types were analyzed. The results indicate that the amount of soil erosion in this research area roughly presents the trend of decreasing from the northeast to the southwest, the soil erosion was the most severe in the eastern highlands of the study area, and the soil erosion in the hilly region of the west was relatively slight, the average soil erosion modulus in this area was 30.15 t/(hm2·a), the amount of soil erosion was 10 2.2085 million t/a. The distribution of soil erosion intensity in every district can be divided into three categories: (1) the key preventing and protecting area, the soil erosion of these areas is mainly micro and slight erosion, vegetation coverage is higher than others, but there is a danger of aggravating the soil erosion, representative districts such as Zhongxian, Liangping, and Dianjiang; (2) the key supervising area, the soil erosion of these areas is mainly middle intensity erosion and intensity erosion, soil erosion is relatively serious, representative districts: Yunyang, Wanzhou, Wushan, Fengjie and Fengdu; (3) the key controlling area, the soil erosion of these areas is mainly the extreme intensity erosion and the violent intensity erosion, soil erosion is the most serious, representative districts: Wuxi, Kaixian and Chengkou. The soil erosion of the areas that rainfall erosivity ranges between 3 000~4 000 (MJ·mm)/(hm2·h·a), the slope is above 25 degrees, the soil is calcareous soil, purplish soil or yellow cinnamon soil, erosion is identified as the intensive level, the extreme intensity erosion and the violent intensity erosion, those areas are the focus of soil erosion control.

参考文献/References:

[1] Miller M F. Waste through soil erosion[J]. Journal Am. Soc. Agron.,1926(18):153-160.
[2] Wischmeier W H, Smith D D. Predicting rainfall erosion losses a guide to conservation planning[M]. Agriculture Handbook, USDA,1978:537.
[3] 汪亚峰,傅伯杰,陈利顶,等.黄土丘陵小流域土地利用变化的土壤侵蚀效应:基于137Cs示踪的定量评价[J].应用生态学报,2009,20(7):1571.
[4] Wischmeier W H, Smith D D. Predicting rainfall erosion losses:A guide to conservation planning[M]. U. S. Dep. Agric., Handb.1978.
[5] 张坤,洪伟,吴承祯,等.福建省降雨侵蚀力R值预测预报方法研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(3):23-25,48.
[6] 曹佳云,杨勤科,王程,等.县域LS因子提取与分析:以陕西长武县为例[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(2):7-10.
[7] 赵辉,郝志敏,齐实,等.南方丘陵紫色页岩地区土壤可蚀性因子K值的确定:以湖南衡阳为例[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(6):41-43.
[8] 陈升琪.重庆地理[M].重庆:西南师范大学出版社,2003.
[9] 重庆统计局,国家统计局重庆调查总队.重庆统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2015.
[10] 卜兆宏,董勤瑞,周伏建,等.降雨侵蚀力因子新算法的初步研究[J].土壤学报,1992,29(4):408-418.
[11] 刘秉正.渭北地区R的估算及分布[J].西北林学院学报,1993,8(2):21-29.
[12] 高克昌,赵纯勇.重庆市主城区降雨侵蚀力计算方法与特征研究[J].水土保持学报,2002,16(6):13-16.
[13] 吴昌广,曾毅,周志翔,等.三峡库区土壤可蚀性K值研究[J].中国水土保持科学,2010,8(3):8-12.
[14] 郭宏忠,才业锦,陈琳,等.基于USLE模型的重庆仙鱼小流域土壤流失减少比例评价[J].西南大学学报:自然科学版,2011,33(1):79-84.
[15] Liu B Y, Nearing M A, Shi P J, et al. Slope Length Effect on Soil Loss for Steep Slopes[J]. Soil Sci, 2000,64(5):1759-1763.
[16] 蔡崇法,丁树文,史志华,等.应用USLE模型与地理信息系统IDRISI预测小流域土壤侵蚀量的研究[J].水土保持学报,2000,14(2):19-24.
[17] 高凤杰,雷国平,宋戈,等.牡丹江市退耕还林对区域土壤侵蚀的影响研究[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(4):14-18.
[18] 中华人民共和国水利部. SL190-2007土壤侵蚀分类分级标准[S].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2007.
[19] 中华人民共和国水利部.关于划分国家级水土流失重点防治区的公告[EB/OL]. http://zwgk.mwr.gov.cn/zfxxgkml/201212/t20121217_335204.html, 2016-05-02.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘士余,董闻达,李德荣.果园水土保持在生态环境建设中的作用初报[J].水土保持研究,2000,7(03):198.
　LIU Shi-yu,DONG Wen-da,LI De-rong.Preliminary Study of Ecological Environment in Orchard Soil and Water Conservation[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2000,7(03):198.
[2]刘培娟,马文贵,杨吉华,等.鲁中南山区径流小区不同坡度条件下4种植被的水土流失规律研究[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(06):338.
　LIU Pei-juan,MA Wen-gui,YANG Ji-hua,et al.Study on Soil and Water Erosion by Different Slope Under Four Kinds of Vegetation in the Middle and South Shandong Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(03):338.
[3]张文海,张行南,高之栋.苏北花岗片麻岩地区USLE模型的试验研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(04):63.
　ZHANG Wen-hai,ZHANG Xing-nan,GAO Zhi-dong.Experimental Study on USLE Model in Granite Gneiss Region of Northern Jiangsu Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(03):63.
[4]徐清艳,周跃.基于GIS和USLE的土壤侵蚀预测研究——以云南新平大红山铁矿为例[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(04):72.
　XU Qing-yan,ZHOU Yue.Study on Prediction of Soil Erosion Based on GIS and USLE—Taking Dahongshan Iron Mine at Xinping of Yunnan Province as A Case Study[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(03):72.
[5]赵海兵,安裕伦,夏品华,等.基于GIS的喀斯特流域土壤侵蚀模数估算——以贵阳麦西河流域为例[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(05):99.
　ZHAO Hai-bing,AN Yu-lun,XIA Pin-hua,et al.Estimate of Soil Erosion Modulus of the Watershed in Karst Region GIS-based-A Case Study of Maixi River Basin in Guiyang[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(03):99.
[6]赖华燕,黄博强,吴鹏飞.海岛型城市的土壤侵蚀状况及主要影响因子分析——以福建省平潭岛为例[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(01):12.
　LAI Huayan,HUANG Boqiang,WU Pengfei.Analysis of the Main Imapct Factors on Soil Erosion in Island City—An Example of Pingtan Island, Fujian Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(03):12.
[7]朱青,崔宏浩,张钦,等.绿肥阻控贵州山区坡耕地水土流失的应用[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(02):101.
　ZHU Qing,CUI Honghao,ZHANG Qin,et al.The Application of Green Manure Controlling Soil Erosion of Slope Farmland in Guizhou Mountain Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(03):101.
[8]马骊驰,王金亮,李石华,等.抚仙湖流域土壤侵蚀遥感监测[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(03):65.
　MA Lichi,WANG Jinliang,LI Shihua,et al.Remote Sensing Monitoring of Soil Erosion in Fuxianhu Lake Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(03):65.
[9]李翠漫,卢远,刘斌涛,等.广西西江流域土壤侵蚀估算及特征分析[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(02):34.
　LI Cuiman,LU Yuan,LIU Bintao,et al.Estimation and Characteristics Analysis of Soil Erosion in Xijiang River Basin of Guangxi[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(03):34.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2016-07-31;改回日期:2016-09-04。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金（41471234）；重庆市基础与前沿研究计划项目（cstc2015jcyjBX0141）；重庆市自然科学资助项目（CSTC，2010BB0326）；重庆市教委社科项目（08JWSK043）；重庆师范大学博士资助项目（05XLB）
作者简介:张超(1992-),男,辽宁凌海人,硕士研究生,研究方向为水土保持与荒漠化治理。E-mail:zhangchao199226@qq.com
通讯作者:陈国建(1975-),男,博士,副教授,从事水土保持,生态修复研究。E-mail:956228510@qq.com

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01