CAI Chuxiong,JIA Yuhua,GUO Chengjiu.Research for Effect of Different Types of Vegetation on Physical Properties Improvement of Sandy Soil in the Sandy Land in South Horqin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(02):49-54.
科尔沁沙地南缘不同植被对土壤物理性质改良作用研究
- Title:
- Research for Effect of Different Types of Vegetation on Physical Properties Improvement of Sandy Soil in the Sandy Land in South Horqin
- Keywords:
- Horqin Sandy Land; vegetations; Pinus sylvestris; Caragana intermedia; green bristlegrass; bare sandy land; improvement
- 分类号:
- S152
- 摘要:
- 试验选取科尔沁沙地南缘樟子松林地、柠条林地、狗尾草草地、裸沙地（对照）4种典型立地类型为研究对象，通过测定各研究地土壤容重、土壤含水率、最大持水量、毛管持水量、田间持水量及沙粒粒径等物理指标，研究分析不同植被对沙地土壤物理性质的改良作用。研究表明：3种植被都对土壤物理性质都有一定改良作用。（1）柠条和樟子松对沙地土的保水效果较差，1 m深处的土壤含水率仅为2.1%和2.6%，低于裸沙地，而狗尾草草地1 m深处的含水率达到7.4%，为裸沙地1 m深处的1.6倍。（2）通过分析0—30 cm各物理指标平均值，得出3种植被下，土壤容重都小于裸沙地；狗尾草草地毛管持水量和田间持水量都最高，分别为21.7%和18.2%。其次为柠条林地和樟子松林地，裸沙地最小；柠条林地最大持水量最高，为24.6%，其次为狗尾草草地和樟子松林地，裸沙地最小。（3）通过对不同土层深度物理指标分析得出：3种植被对0—10 cm和10—20 cm的土壤容重、最大持水量、田间持水量有显著影响，而对毛管持水量没有显著影响；对20—30 cm的土壤各指标都有显著的影响。（4）三种植被对土壤颗粒分布异质性改良效果的大小顺序依次为狗尾草 > 樟子松 > 柠条，其间接反映了土壤粒径分布范围的均匀程度，其由高到低依次为狗尾草 > 樟子松 > 柠条。综上，与裸沙地相比，种植各植被土壤的物理指标明显好于裸沙地，表明植被能明显改善当地土壤的物理性质。
- Abstract:
- The experiment selected four typical sites of sandy lands with Pinus sylvestris forest, Caragana intermedia forest, green bristlegrass and bare sandy land (control) in the south edge of Horqin as the research samples. Through the study of physical index determination of soil bulk density, soil moisture content, maximum water holding capacity, capillary water holding capacity, field moisture capacity and particle size analysis, the effect of different vegetation on soil physical properties were examined. The results show that three kinds of vegetation could completely improve the soil physical properties to some extent. (1) Caragana intermedia and Pinus sylvestris have poor water conservation capacity and soil moisture contents in 1 m depth was only 2.1% and 2.6%, respectively, which are lower than that of the bare sandy land. However the soil moisture content in the depth of 1 m of green bristlegrass reached to 7.4%, which is about 1.6 times more than that in the depth of 1 m in the bare sandy land. (2) By analyzing the average value of each physical index in 0—30 cm layer, we may draw the conclusion that the sandy sites with three kinds of vegetation have the lower soil bulk density than bare sandy land. The capillary water holding capacity and field moisture capacity of green bristlegrass are the highest, which are 21.7% and 18.2%, respectively. The next is Caragana intermedia forest and Pinus sylvestris forest and the smallest is bare sandy land. The maximum water holding capacity of Caragana intermedia forest is the highest one, which is 24.6%. The next is green bristlegrass and Pinus sylvestris, and the bare sandy land is the smallest one. (3) Through the analysis of the physical indexes of different soil depths, we may come to conclusion that at the depth of 0—10 cm and the depth of 10—20 cm, three kinds of vegetation have the significant impact on soil bulk density, maximum water holding capacity and field moisture capacity, but does not have the significant impact on the capillary water holding capacity. Three kinds of vegetation have the significant impact on each physical index at the depth of 20—30 cm. (4) The improvement effect caused by the three kinds of vegetation on the heterogeneity of soil distribution followed the order:green bristlegrass > Pinus sylvestris > Caragana intermedia, which indirectly indicated that the uniformity coefficient of particle size distribution in the sandy soil under different vegetation forms followed the order:green bristlegrass > Pinus sylvestris > Caragana intermedia. Compared with the bare sandy land, the soil physical indexes of various vegetation types are better than the bare sandy. The results show that vegetation can significantly improve the local soil physical properties.
参考文献/References:
[1] 连杰,赵学勇,王少昆,等.科尔沁沙地风蚀作用对土壤碳、氮分布的影响[J].生态学杂志,2013,32(3):529-535.
[2] 苏永中,赵哈林,张铜会,等.科尔沁沙地不同年代小叶锦鸡儿人工林植物群落特征及其土壤特征[J].植物生态学报,2004,28(1):93-100.
[3] 康宏樟,朱教君,许美玲.科尔沁沙地樟子松人工林幼树水分生理生态特性[J].干旱区研究,2007,24(1):15-22.
[4] 王利兵,胡小龙,余伟莅,等.沙粒粒径组成的空间异质性及其与灌丛大小和土壤风蚀相关性分析[J].干旱区地理,2006,29(5):688-693.
[5] 党宏忠,周泽福,赵雨森,等.祁连山水源涵养林土壤水文特征研究[J].林业科学究,2006,19(1):39-44.
[6] 夏江宝,陆兆华,高鹏,等.黄河三角洲滩地不同植被的土壤贮水功能[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(5):79-83.
[7] 魏强,张秋良,代海燕,等.大青山不同林地类型土壤特性及其水源涵养功能[J].水土保持学报,2008,22(2):111-115.
[8] 李德生,张萍,张水龙,等.黄前库区森林地表径流水移动规律的研究[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(1):78-81.
[9] 夏江宝,曲志远,朱玮,等.鲁中山区不同人工林土壤水分特征[J].水土保持科学,2005,3(3):45-50.
[10] 王德,傅伯杰,陈利顶.不同土地利用类型下土壤粒径分形分析:以黄土丘陵沟壑区为例[J].生态学报,2007,27(7):3081-3089.
[11] 张光辉,梁一民,植被盖度对水土保持功效影响的研究综述[J].水土保持研究,1996,3(2):104-110.
[12] Thomas F M. Growth and water relations of four deciduous tree species (Fagus sylvatica, Quercus petraea, Q. pubescens, Sorbusaria) occurring at central-European tree-line site on shallow cal~careous soil:physiological reaction of seedlings to severe drought[J]. Flora, 2000,195:104-115.
[13] Lambers H, Chapin F S, Pons T L. Plant Physicological Ecology[M]. New York:Springer Verlag, 1998.
[14] 冯琳,宓永宁,赵琳.彰武县阿尔乡不同沙地类型土壤质量的灰色关联度评价研究[J].现代农业科技,2007,(6):133-135.
[15] 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000.
[16] 郭柯,董学军,刘志茂.毛乌素沙地沙丘土壤含水量特点:兼论老固定沙地上油蒿衰退原因[J].植物生态学报,2000,24(3):275-279.
[17] 李卓,吴普特,冯浩,等.容重对土壤水分蓄持能力影响模拟试验研究[J].土壤学报,2010,47(4):611-620.
[18] 柴亚凡,王恩妲,陈祥伟,等.植被恢复模式对黑土贮水性能及水分入渗特征的影响[J].水土保持学报,2008,22(1):60-64.
[19] 饶良懿,朱金兆,毕华兴.重庆四面山森林枯落物和土壤水文效应[J].北京林业大学学报,2005,27(1):33-37.
[20] 韩路,王海珍,于军.塔里木河上游不同植被土壤水文特性研究[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(6):124-129.
[21] 何玉惠,赵哈林,刘新平,等.不同类型沙地狗尾草的生长特征及生物量分配[J].生态学杂志,2008,27(4):504-508.
[22] 潘占兵,李生宝,郭永忠,等.不同种植密度人工柠条林对土壤水分的影响[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(3):265-267.
[23] 任蔓莉,魏晨辉,裴忠雪,等.松嫩平原沙土区不同植被类型对土壤相关指标的影响[J].植物研究,2015,35(5):765-771.
相似文献/References:
[1]肖培青,姚文艺,张海峰.黄土高原植被固土减蚀作用研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):282.
XIAO Pei-qing,YAO Wen-yi,ZHANG Hai-feng.Research Progress of the Role of Vegetation in Soil Conservtion and Soil Erosion Reduction on the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(02):282.
[2]魏丰良,刘廷玺,张圣微,等.科尔沁沙地植被覆盖变化及其与气候因子的关系研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(03):254.
WEI Feng-liang,LIU Ting-xi,ZHANG Sheng-wei,et al.Research for Vegetation Cover Change of Horqin Sandy Land and its Relationship with the Climate Factors[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(02):254.
[3]汪有科,吴钦孝,韩冰.黄土高原植被建造优化模式[J].水土保持研究,1994,1(03):87.
Wang Youke,Wu Qinxiao,Han Bin.Optimum Patterns to Building Vegetation on the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1994,1(02):87.
[4]王礼先.植被生态建设与生态用水——以西北地区为例[J].水土保持研究,2000,7(03):5.
WANG Li-xian.Vegetative Eco-environment Construction and Water Use of Eco-environment——Taking Northwestern Area for An Example[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2000,7(02):5.
[5]高科,任于幽,郑明军,等.科尔沁沙地风、水侵蚀原因及其动态研究[J].水土保持研究,2001,8(01):110.
GAO Ke,REN Yuyou,ZHENG Mingjun,et al.Study on Causes of Wind and Water Erosion and Dynamic State in Kerqin Sandy Land[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2001,8(02):110.
[6]李鹏,李占斌,郑良勇.植被保持水土有效性研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(01):76.
LI Peng,LI Zhan-bin,ZHENG Liang-yong.Advances in Researches of the Effectiveness for Vegetation Conserving Soil and Water[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2002,9(02):76.
[7]张源润,蔡进军,李振永,等.宁南半干旱退化山区林草植被快速恢复技术研究[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(04):12.
ZHANG Yuan-run,CAI Jin-jun,LI Zhen-yong,et al.Research on Vegetation Recovery Technology in Semi-arid Degenerated Mountainous Area in South Ningxia[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(02):12.
[8]杨树,温雨金,刘鸿雁.内蒙古中部地区退耕还林还草后植被与土壤性状的变化[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(04):143.
YANG Shu,WEN YU-jin,LIU Hong-yan.Ecological Effects of Mandatory Conversion of Marginal Farmland to Forestland and Grassland in Central Inner Mongolia[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(02):143.
[9]马绍休,王涛,张建民,等.民勤地区供水和生态需水量分析[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(06):58.
MA Shao-xiu,WANG Tao,ZHANG Jian-min,et al.The Theory of Ecological Water Requirement for Vegetation and Its Application to Minqin Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(02):58.
[10]鄢朝勇,叶建军,韦书勇.植被对边坡浅层稳定的影响[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(01):24.
YAN Chao-yong,YE Jian-jun,WEI Shu-yong.Influence of Vegetation on Slope Shallow Stability[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(02):24.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2016-09-04;改回日期:2016-09-26。
基金项目:国家农业综合开发东北黑土区水土流失重点治理科技推广项目“面源污染防治技术体系在水土保持当中的应用”
作者简介:蔡楚雄(1990-),男,辽宁省沈阳人,硕士,主要研究方向土壤侵蚀规律及其治理方面的研究。E-mail:1587868844@qq.com
通讯作者:郭成久(1964-),男,辽宁锦州人,教授,主要从事土壤侵蚀规律及其治理研究。E-mail:chengjiuguo11@163.com