[1]赵越,张富,陈瑾,等.安家沟流域不同土地利用方式下地表径流中COD和TN的污染负荷[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(01):103-108,114.
　ZHAO Yue,ZHANG Fu,CHEN Jin,et al.COD and TN Pollution Loads in Surface Runoff Under Different Land Uses in Anjiagou Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(01):103-108,114.
点击复制

安家沟流域不同土地利用方式下地表径流中COD和TN的污染负荷

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 24 期数: 2017年01期 页码: 103-108,114 栏目: 出版日期: 2017-02-28
Title:
COD and TN Pollution Loads in Surface Runoff Under Different Land Uses in Anjiagou Basin
作者:
赵越1, 张富1, 陈瑾2, 张佰林2, 康启燕1
1. 甘肃农业大学 林学院, 兰州 730070;
2. 甘肃省定西市水土保持研究所, 甘肃 定西 743000
Author(s):
ZHAO Yue1, ZHANG Fu1, CHEN Jin2, ZHANG Bailin2, KANG Qiyan1
1. College of Forestry, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China;
2. Dingxi Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Dingxi, Gansu 743000, China
关键词:
土地利用; 面源污染; 径流水质; 污染负荷
Keywords:
land use; non-point pollution; water quality of runoff; pollution load
分类号:
X5;P334
摘要:
为探明黄河流域不同土地利用方式下地表径流中COD和TN污染分布规律，以安家沟流域为研究对象，采用平均浓度模型，对径流来源及其污染负荷进行了分析研究。结果表明：安家沟流域不同土地利用方式下地表径流中7项污染物质量浓度平均超标1.31倍，其中ρ（CODMn）和ρ（TN）分别超标1.78，2.11倍；劣Ⅴ类水质出现的平均频率为23.86%，其中CODMn和TN平均出现频率分别为28.17%，52.03%；不同土地利用措施受径流量及其拦蓄效率和污染物输出水平的影响，CODMn和TN两者污染负荷总量主要分布在林地和农地，其单位面积污染负荷以荒坡为最大（2.989 kg/hm2），草地次之（2.937 kg/hm2），林地第三（1.327 kg/hm2），农地最小（0.447 kg/hm2）；在坡面到沟道的径流过程中，由于土壤入渗等因子的影响，污染物总量在流域径流过程中具有明显的衰减过程，ρ（CODMn）衰减了40.01%，ρ（TN）衰减了38.33%。研究显示，安家沟流域COD和TN污染在不同土地利用措施之间分异明显，合理规划土地利用方式、加强水土保持措施可有效减轻面源污染的发生。
Abstract:
In order to understand the distribution of COD and TN pollution in different land uses, selecting Anjiagou Basin as the research site, we used the average concentration model to analyze the runoff source and pollution load. The results showed that the concentrations of 7 pollutants in surface runoff were 1.31 times more than the standard under different land uses, in which CODMn and TN exceeded the standard 1.78 times and 2.11 times, respectively; the average occurrence frequency of the water quality worse than grade Ⅴ was 23.86%, CODMn and TN were 28.17% and 52.03%, respectively; because of the runoff, impounding efficiency and pollutant output level effect on different land uses, CODMn and TN pollution loads mainly distributed in the woodland and farmland, the waste hillside of pollution load was maximum in the unit area of CODMn and TN (2.989 kg/hm2), grassland came second (2.937 kg/hm2), woodland third (1.327 kg/hm2) was next, and agricultural land was minimum (0.447 kg/hm2); in the runoff process from slope to channel, due to the effect of soil infiltration and other factors, the total amount of pollutants had obvious attenuation, ρ (CODMn) and ρ (TN) decreased by 40.01% and 38.33%, respectively. The results showed that the CODMn pollution and TN pollution were significantly discrepant in different land use, and rational planning of land use, strengthening soil and water conservation measures could effectively reduce the occurrence of non-point source pollution.

参考文献/References:

[1] Dennis L C, Peter J V, Keith L. Modeling non-point source pollution in vadose zone with GIS[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 1997,8:2157-2175.
[2] Parry R. Agricultural phosphorus and water quality:A US environmental protection agency perspective[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality, 1998,27(2):258-261.
[3] 高超,张桃林.欧洲国家控制农业养分污染水环境的管理措施[J].农村生态环境,1999,15(2):50-53.
[4] Boers P C M. Nutrient emissions from agriculture in the Netherlands, causes and remedies[J]. Water Science & Technology, 1996,33(4):183-189.
[5] 杨林章,冯彦房,施卫明,等.我国农业面源污染治理技术研究进展[J].中国生态农业学报,2013,21(1):96-101.
[6] 李自林.我国农业面源污染现状及其对策研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2013,31(5):207-212.
[7] 纪丁愈,王庆安,佘红英,等.川中丘陵地区小流域农业面源污染特征及水环境容量研究:以黄腊溪小流域为例[J].水资源与水工程学报,2011,22(4):81-84.
[8] 吴磊.三峡库区典型区域氮、磷和农药非点源污染物随水文过程的迁移转化及其归趋研究[D].重庆:重庆大学城市建设与环境工程学院,2014.
[9] 中华人民共和国环境保护部,中华人民共和国国家统计局,中华人民共和国农业部.第一次全国污染源普查公报[R/OL].中华人民共和国国家统计局,(2010-02-11). http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/tjgb/qttjgb/qgqttjgb/201002/t20100211_30641.htm.
[10] 莫明浩,方少文,涂安国,等.水土流失面源污染及其防控研究综述[J].中国水土保持,2012(6):32-34.
[11] 胡宏祥,马友华.水土流失及其对农业非点源污染的影响[J].中国农学通报,2008,24(6):408-412.
[12] 周生贤.国务院关于水污染防治工作进展情况的报告:2008年12月24日在第十一届全国人民代表大会常务委员会第六次会议上[J].中华人民共和国全国人民代表大会常务委员会公报,2009(1):74-78.
[13] 杨艳春,闫莉,程伟.黄河流域非点源污染估算研究[J].人民黄河,2011,33(11):66-68.
[14] 国家环境保护总局,国家质量监督检验检疫总局.地表水环境质量标准GB3838-2002[S].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002.
[15] 李怀恩.估算非点源污染负荷的平均浓度法及其应用[J].环境科学学报,2000,20(4):397-400.
[16] 刘洁,陈晓宏,周纯,等.非点源污染在东江河流水环境中的贡献比例估算[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24(S1):79-82.
[17] 张富,姚进忠,雷升文,等.甘肃省水土保持综合治理效益研究[M].郑州:黄河水利出版社,2014.
[18] 应兰兰,侯西勇,路晓,等.我国非点源污染研究中输出系数问题[J].水资源与水工程学报,2010,21(6):90-95,99.
[19] 廖义善,卓慕宁,李定强,等.基于"径流-地类"参数的非点源氮磷负荷估算方法[J].环境科学学报,2014,34(8):2126-2132.
[20] 蒋昌波,楚贝,胡世雄,等.涟水流域非点源污染特征[J].长沙理工大学学报:自然科学版,2011,8(4):64-70.
[21] 张皓天,张弛,周慧成,等.基于SWAT模型的流域非点源污染模拟[J].河南大学学报:自然科学版,2010,38(6):644-650.
[22] 贺缠生,傅伯杰,陈利顶.非点源污染管理及控制[J].环境科学,1998,19(5):87-91.
[23] 唐莲,白丹.农业活动非点源污染与水环境恶化[J].环境保护,2003(3):18-20.
[24] 卜红梅,王岑,张全发.汉江上游金水河流域非点源污染及控制[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(4):33-38.
[25] 胥彦玲,王苏舰,李怀恩.土地覆被变化对流域非点源污染的影响研究:以黑河流域为例[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(3):250-253.
[26] 李俊然,陈利顶,郭旭东,等.土地利用结构对非点源污染的影响[J].中国环境科学,2000,20(6):506-510.
[27] 孙娟,顾霜妹,李强坤.水土流失与农业非点源污染[J].水利科技与经济,2008,14(12):963-965.

相似文献/References:

[1]范新军,毕天云.云南边境石漠化地区“三生空间”格局演变及驱动机制[J].水土保持研究,2025,32(06):424.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2025.06.011]
　Fan Xinjun,Bi Tianyun.Evolution of production-living-ecological space pattern and its driving mechanisms in rocky desertification areas of Yunnan border region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2025,32(01):424.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2025.06.011]
[2]徐 云,高明坤,张增信.基于InVEST模型的长江中下游地区生境质量变化研究[J].水土保持研究,2024,31(05):355.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.05.032]
　Xu Yun,Gao Mingkun,Zhang Zengxin.Land Use Change and Its Impact on Habitat Quality in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River Based on InVEST Model[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(01):355.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.05.032]
[3]孙保平,孙立达.西吉县黄家二岔小流域地表径流和土壤渗透性能的研究[J].水土保持研究,1990,(02):16.
　Sun Baoping,Sun Lida.A Research For Soil Permeability and Surface Runoff in Huangjia-Ercha Small Watershed in Xiji County, Ningxia[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1990,(01):16.
[4]赵昭霞,叶树华.渭南地区土地利用现状简析[J].水土保持研究,1992,(02):35.
　Zhao Zhaoxia,Yie Shuhua.ANALYSIS OF LAND UTILIZATION OF WEINAN PREFECTURE[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1992,(01):35.
[5]杨勤科,郑粉莉,张竹梅.神木试区土地资源与利用[J].水土保持研究,1993,(02):47.
　Yang Qinke,Zheng Fenli,Zhang Zhumei.Land Resources and Its Utilization in the Shenmu Experimental Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1993,(01):47.
[6]张希彪,上官周平.陇东黄土高原土地利用空间格局研究[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(04):167.
　ZHANG Xi-biao,SHANGGUAN Zhou-ping.Study on the Spatial Pattern of Land-use in Longdong Areas[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(01):167.
[7]闫岩,雷国平,谢英楠.基于AHP和熵权法的土地利用生态效益研究[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(06):134.
　YAN Yan,LEI Guo-ping,XIE Ying-nan.Study on Evaluation of Land Use Ecological Efficiency Based on AHP and Entropy Weight Method[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(01):134.
[8]路昌,雷国平,张慧,等.黑龙江省哈尔滨市不同土地利用类型的碳排放效应分析[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(06):245.
　LU Chang,LEI Guo-ping,ZHANG Hui,et al.Effects of Different Land Use Patterns on Carbon Emission in Harbin City of Heilongjiang Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(01):245.
[9]陈杰,杨太保,何毅.石羊河下游民勤土地利用及景观格局动态分析[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(06):251.
　CHEN Jie,YANG Tai-bao,HE Yi.Analysis on Dynamic Characteristics of Landscape Patterns in Minqin of Shiyang River Downstream[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(01):251.
[10]申怀飞,侯刚,魏庆伟,等.南水北调中线水源区土地利用/覆被空间格局特征分析[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(06):209.
　SHEN Huai-fei,HOU Gang,WEI Qing-wei,et al.The Spatial Distribution of Land Use/Land Cover in the Water Supplying Area of the Middle-Route of the South-to-North Water Diversion (Mr-Snwd) Project[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(01):209.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2016-01-22;改回日期:2016-02-28。
基金项目:甘肃省科技支撑项目“祖厉河流域面源污染机理和治理技术研究”（1204FKCA170）
作者简介:赵越(1989-),男,甘肃兰州人,硕士,研究方向为水土保持措施配置及环境整治。E-mail:446241233@qq.com
通讯作者:张富(1961-),男,甘肃定西人,博士,研究员,主要从事水土保持措施配置及环境整治研究。E-mail:fuzhang001@163.com

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01