WANG Guoyou.An Empirical Study on Dispersed Choice in WTP for GHG Reduction Based on the Resident’s Specific Properties[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(05):291-297.
基于城市居民特性的温室气体减排支付意愿离散选择研究
- Title:
- An Empirical Study on Dispersed Choice in WTP for GHG Reduction Based on the Resident’s Specific Properties
- 关键词:
- 温室气体减排; 支付意愿; Logistic离散选择模型; 影响因素
- Keywords:
- GHG reduction; WTP; logistic discrete choice model; affecting factor
- 分类号:
- F062.2;X51
- 摘要:
- 基于消费者支付意愿的定量评价是建立我国温室气体减排框架、确定不同地区合理的减排责任和低碳经济发展政策的基础。整个选择过程是系统分量（支付属性）和随机分量（居民特性）共同作用的结果。以2014年成都、重庆、乌鲁木齐3个西部城市收集的意愿性数据为分析基础，借助Logistic离散选择回归模型系统分析影响居民温室气体减排支付意愿的影响因素。结果表明：乌鲁木齐城市居民支付意愿最高，成都次之，重庆最低。所处地域、年龄、受教育程度、年收入、职业、有无子女和支付动机7个变量对支付意愿影响显著。较之与多数完成式数据的研究相比，意愿性调查能更好地通过分析未选择者的约束因素，从而可更好分析居民对温室气体减排的认知和态度。
- Abstract:
- Choice of WTP for GHG reduction has always been one of the basis of the study of building China’s GHG emissions framework, different parts of the reasonable responsibility to reduce emissions and low carbon economy development policies. The whole process of choice is commonly influenced by systematic component (payment attribute) and random component (resident property). Based on WTP survey in the Chengdu City， Chongqing City and Urumqi City, Logistic discrete choice model was used to analyze affecting factors on resident’s WTP. The results show that the Urumqi City residents have the highest willingness to pay followed by Chengdu City and Chongqing City. It was found that region, age, education, income, occupation, children and pay motivation significantly influenced the willingness to pay. Compared with the most perfect data research, intent-to-treat research can better analyze the residents’ perception and attitude of greenhouse gas emissions.
参考文献/References:
[1] Burghart D R, Cameron T A, Gerdes G R. Valuing publicly sponsored research projects:risks, scenario adjustments, and inattention[J]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty,2007,35(1):77-105.
[2] Viscusi W K, Zeckhauser R J. The perception and valuation of the risks of climate change:a rational and behavioral blend[J]. Climatic Change,2006,77(1/2):151-177.
[3] Lee J J, Cameron T A. Popular support for climate change mitigation:evidence from a general population mail survey[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics,2008,41(2):223-248.
[4] 郑思齐,符育明,任荣荣.居民对城市生活质量的偏好:从住房成本变动和收敛角度的研究[J].世界经济文汇,2011(2):35-49.
[5] 曾贤刚.我国城镇居民对CO2减排的支付意愿调查研究[J].中国环境科学,2011,31(2):346-352.
[6] 国家发展和改革委员会能源研究所课题组.中国2050年低碳发展之路:能源需求暨碳排放情景分析[M].北京:科学出版社,2009.
[7] 齐晔.中国低碳发展报告(2013)[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2013.
[8] Andersen M S, Ekins P. Carbon-Energy Taxation:Lessons from Europe[M]. London:OUP Oxford,2009.
[9] Train K E. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2003.
[10] 聂冲,贾生华.离散选择模型的基本原理及其发展演进评价[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2005,12(11):151-159.
[11] Andrews R L, Ainslie A, Currim I S. An empirical comparison of logit choice models with discrete versus continuous representations of heterogeneity[J]. Journal of Marketing Research,2002,39(4):479-487.
[12] 中国气候传播项目中心.中国公众气候变化与气候传播认知状况调研报告[R].北京:中国气候传播项目中心,2012.
[13] Leiserowitz A A. American risk perceptions:Is climate change dangerous[J]. Risk Analysis,2005,25(6):1433-1442.
[14] 赵现红.基于游客特性的旅游目的地离散选择实证研究:以三大口岸中转型入境游客为例[J].旅游学刊,2009,24(12):60-62.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2015-10-01;改回日期:2015-11-20。
基金项目:国家社科资助项目“我国铜资源二次利用的生态产业链延伸路径研究”（15XGL016）；教育部人文社科青年项目“三峡库区环境区居民传统环境权利剥夺的生态补偿制度研究”（10YJC790250）；重庆市哲学社会科学规划项目“三峡工程后续期生态补偿制度研究”（2010YBJJ09）
作者简介:王国友(1974-),男,新疆乌鲁木齐人,高级工程师,博士,主要从事资源经济学研究。E-mail:emcwgy@163.com