SUN Zhengguo.Soil Enzyme Activity and Microbial Diversity in Rhizosphere of Continuous Watermelon Cropping[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(05):46-51,57.
连作西瓜的根际土壤酶活性和微生物多样性
- Title:
- Soil Enzyme Activity and Microbial Diversity in Rhizosphere of Continuous Watermelon Cropping
- Keywords:
- continuous cropping; watermelon; soil nutrients; soil enzyme activity; rhizoshpere microorganisms
- 分类号:
- S154.3
- 摘要:
- 以山东大鹏西瓜基地0，3，9，15 a的西瓜根和根际土壤为研究对象，采用野外调查和实验室分析方法分析连作对西瓜根际土壤酶活性和微生物多样性的影响。结果表明：随着连作年限的增加，土壤有机质和氮磷钾含量递减，连作第15年有机质及有效氮磷钾含量最低。在同一生长时期内，连作年限越长，西瓜根系活跃吸收面积和总吸收面积最低，根际土壤酶活性呈现先递增后下降的趋势，并且根际土壤酶活力幼苗期 < 抽蔓期 < 结果期。在连作前期土壤中可培养微生物代谢活力递增，连作后期微生物代谢活力递减，且连作越久土壤中微生物群落多样性降低，均匀度先增加后降低。相关性分析表明，土壤中过氧化氢酶（p < 0.05）、磷酸酶（p < 0.05）、蔗糖酶（p < 0.01）、速效磷（p < 0.05）、速效钾（p < 0.05）与真菌具有正相关性；脲酶与细菌正相关（p < 0.01），与碱解氮负相关（p < 0.01）；过氧化氢酶（p < 0.05）、碱解氮（p < 0.01）与放线菌具有显著正相关。综上所述，连作0～9 a，土壤微生物代谢活力和酶活性增强，养分流失较小；连作9 a后，土壤养分流失严重，土壤酶活性和微生物代谢活力显著降低，产生连作障碍，说明减少连作年限可使西瓜优质丰产并且可持续发展，反之影响西瓜正常生长生产，损害经济效益。
- Abstract:
- In order to improve the cultivation quality and provide reference for the high yield and excellent quantity and sustainable development of watermelon, the roots and rhizosphere soils with watermelone growths of 0, 3, 9 and 15 years which were marked as CK, CP3, CP9 and CP15 were collected in Dapeng watermelon base in Shandong Province. Root activity, soil nutrients, soil enzyme activity and rhizosphere microorganisms were measured, and correlation analysis between them was carried out. It turned out that soil organic matter and the contents of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium were decreasing and nutrients were losing with the duration of continuous cropping, the lowest was found in fifteen year of continuous cropping. At the same growth period, active absorption area and total absorption area of watermelon roots reduced respectively in long term continuous cropping. Rhizosphere soil enzyme activity showed a trend with the increase at first and decline later, and the activity was high in thefruiting period. Soil culturable microbial metabolic activity increased at the early stage of the continuous cropping, microbial metabolic activity reduced at the late stage, and the longer continuous cropping was, the less soil microbial community diversity was, evenness increased at first and reduced later. Correlation analysis showed that the soil catalase (p < 0.05), phosphatase (p < 0.05), sucrase (p < 0.01) and available phosphorus (p < 0.05), and available potassium (p < 0.05) had the positive correlation with the fungus. Urease had a positive correlation with the bacteria (p < 0.01), was negatively related to the alkali solution nitrogen (p < 0.01); catalase (p < 0.05), alkali solution nitrogen (p < 0.01) and actinomycetes had significant positive correlation. To sum up, a few years before continuous cropping, microbal metabolisms and enzyme activity had increased, continuous cropping obstacles did not occur. After 9 years, soil nutrient loss was serious, microbal metabolisms and enzyme activity significantly reduced, continuous cropping obstacles occurred. Reducing the time of continuous cropping could improve high yield and excellent quantity and sustainable development of watermelon, conversely affected the growth of watermelon, and lowered the economic benefits.
参考文献/References:
[1] 吴凤芝,刘德,王东凯,等.大鹏番茄不同连作年限对根系活力及其品质的影响[J].东北农业大学学报:自然科学版,1997,28(1):33-38.
[2] 喻景权,杜饶舜.蔬菜设施栽培可持续发展中的连作障碍问题[J].沈阳农业大学报:自然科学版,2000,31(1):124-126.
[3] 张晓玲,潘振刚,周晓峰,等.自毒作用与连作障碍[J].土壤通报,2007,38(4):781-784.
[4] 樊军,郝明德.长期轮作与施肥对土壤主要微生物类群的影响[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(1):88-90.
[5] 孙继民,邹学校,罗尊长,等.辣椒连作研究进展[J].辣椒杂志,2011,2(1):1-7.
[6] 袁龙刚,张军林.辣椒连作障碍的主要原因及其对策[J].园林园艺,2006,6(2):32-33.
[7] 孙艳艳,蒋桂英,刘建国,等.加工番茄连作对农田土壤酶活性及微生物区系的影响[J].生态学报,2010,30(13):3599-3607.
[8] 张淑香,高子勤,刘海玲.连作障碍与根际微生态研究Ⅲ:土壤酚酸物质及其生物学效应[J].应用生态学报,2000,13(5):741-744.
[9] 李威,程智慧,孟焕文,等.轮作不同蔬菜对大鹏番茄连作基质中微生物与酶及后茬番茄的影响[J].园艺学报,2012,39(1):73-80.
[10] 胡元森,刘亚峰,吴坤,等.黄瓜连作土壤微生物区系变化研究[J].土壤通报,2006,37(1):126-129.
[11] 王涛,乔卫花,李玉奇,等.轮作和微生物菌肥对黄瓜连作土壤理化性状及生物活性的影响[J].土壤通报,2011,42(3):578-583.
[12] 吴凤芝,赵凤艳,刘元英.设施蔬菜连作障碍原因综合分析与防治措施[J].东北农业大学学报:自然科学版,2000,31(3):241-247.
[13] 李跃林,彭少麟,李志辉.桉树人工林地土壤酶活性与微量元素含量的关系[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(3):345-348.
[14] 邱并生.西瓜连作障碍及其预防[J].微生物学通报,2010,37(6):941-943.
[15] 张子龙,王全文.植物连作障碍的形成机制及其调控技术研究进展[J].生物学杂志,2010,27(5):69-72.
[16] 鲍士丹.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000.
[17] 陈先茂,彭春瑞,关贤交,等.红壤旱地不同轮作模式的效益及其对土壤质量的影响[J].江西农业学报,2009,21(6):75-77.
[18] 鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000.
[19] Sun D, Walsh D. Review of studies on environmental impacts of recreation and tourism in Australia[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,1998,53(4):323-338.
[20] Hoh J A. Grazing pressure and soil carbon microbial biomass and enzyme activities in semiarid Northeastern Australia[J]. Applied Soil Ecology,1997,5(2):143-149.
[21] 曹慧,孙辉,杨浩,等.土壤酶活性及其对土壤质量的指标研究[J].应用与环境生物学报,2003,9(1):105-109.
[22] Zhang Y M, Wu N, Zhou G Y, et al. Changes in enzyme activties of spruce (Picea balfouriana) forest soil as related to burning in the eastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. Applied Soil Ecology,2005,30(3):215-225.
[23] Selmants P C, Hart S C, Boyle S I, et al. Red alder (Alnusrubra) alter community-level soil microbial function in conifer forests of the Pacific Northwest, USA[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2005,37(10):1860-1868.
[24] 邵玉琴,赵吉.不同固沙区结皮中微生物生物量和数量的比较研究[J].中国沙漠,2004,24(1):68-71.
[25] 王冬梅,王春枝,韩晓日,等.长期施肥对棕壤主要酶活性的影响[J].土壤通报,2006,37(2):263-268.
[26] 张志良.植物生理学试验指导[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2002.
[27] 吴凤芝,栾非时,王东凯,等.大鹏黄瓜连作对根系活力及其根际土壤酶活性影响的研究[J].东北农业大学学报:自然科学版,1996,27(3):255-258.
[28] 高婷,张源沛.宁夏荒漠草原土壤微生物季节变化的初步研究[J].宁夏工程技术,2006,5(3):297-299.
[29] 杨元根, Paterson E, Campbell C. Biolog方法在区分城市土壤与农村土壤微生物特性上的应用[J].土壤学报,2002,39(4):582-589.
[30] 张小磊,何宽,安春华,等.不同土地利用方式对城市土壤活性有机碳的影响:以开封市为例[J].生态环境,2006,15(6):1220-1222.
[31] 陈帅,王效科,逯非.城市与郊区森林土壤微生物群落特征差异研究[J].土壤通报,2012,43(3):614-620.
[32] 陈慧,郝慧荣,熊君,等.地黄连作对根际微生物区系及土壤酶活性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(12):2755-2759.
[33] 何跃军,钟章成,刘济明,等.石灰岩退化生态系统不同恢复阶段土壤酶活性研究[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(6):1077-1081.
[34] 赵萌,李敏,王淼焱,等.西瓜连作对土壤主要微生物类群和土壤酶活性的影响[J].微生物学通报,2008,35(8):1251-1254.
[35] 郭士伟,夏士健,朱虹霞,等.水稻根系活力测定方法及超级稻两优九生育后期根系活力研究[J].土壤,2012,44(2):308-311.
[36] Yao H Y, Jiao X D, Wu F Z. Effects of continuous cucumber cropping and alternative rotations under protected cultivation on soil microbial community diversity[J]. Plant and Soil, 2006,284(1):195-203.
[37] 彭令发,郝明德,来璐.黄土旱塬长期连作条件下土壤氮素变化及管理[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(1):43-45.
[38] 樊军,郝明德,王永功.旱地长期轮作施肥对土壤肥力影响的定位研究[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(1):31-36.
[39] 黄益宗,冯宗炜,张福珠.化感物质对土壤硝化反应影响的研究[J].土壤与环境,1999,8(3):203-207.
[40] 马云华,魏珉,王秀峰.日光温室连作黄瓜根区微生物区系及酶活性的变化[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(6):1005-1008.
[41] 李春格,李晓鸣,王敬国.大豆连作对土体和根际微生物群落功能的影响[J].生态学报,2006,26(4):1144-1150.
[42] 危锋,郝明德.长期氮磷化肥配施对不同种植体系土壤水分的影响[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(6):67-70.
相似文献/References:
[1]樊军,郝明德.长期轮作与施肥对土壤主要微生物类群的影响[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(01):88.
FAN Jun,HAO Ming-de.Effects of Longterm Rotations and Fertilizations on Soil Microflora[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2003,10(05):88.
[2]孙凯宁,杨宁,王克安,等.山药连作对土壤微生物群落及土壤酶活性的影响[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(06):95.
SUN Kaining,YANG Ning,WANG Kean,et al.Effect of Chinese Yam Continuous Cropping on the Soil Microbial Community and Soil Enzyme Activity[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(05):95.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2014-11-17;改回日期:2014-12-10。
作者简介:孙正国(1966-),男,江苏南通人,副教授,主要从事农业生态研究。E-mail:zhengguosun@163.com