DU Huaming,HE Shengying.The Analysis on Characteristics of Precipitation and Trends in Drought and Flood Disasters in Minjiang River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(01):153-157.
岷江流域降水特征与旱涝灾害趋势分析
- Title:
- The Analysis on Characteristics of Precipitation and Trends in Drought and Flood Disasters in Minjiang River Basin
- 关键词:
- 岷江流域; 降水特征; 标准化降水指数(SPI); 旱涝
- Keywords:
- Minjiang River Basin; precipitation character; standardized precipitation index (SPI); droughts and floods
- 分类号:
- P333.1;P954
- 摘要:
- 基于岷江流域14个气象站点1961—2012年逐月降水资料，采用数理统计方法结合GIS空间分析技术，对流域降水量时空演变特征进行了分析，利用不同尺度的标准化降水指数（SPI）对流域旱涝特征进行了研究。结果表明：（1）近52 a来，岷江流域年平均降水量呈显著减少趋势，减少倾向率为20.18 mm/10 a；流域年均降水量在1993年发生突变，降水量显著减少。（2）该流域降水量由东南向西北呈递减趋势，以松潘—小金—康定为界，该线以西地区年降水量为616～1 000 mm；该界线以东地区年降水量为1 000～1 732 mm。（3）以松潘—小金—康定为界，该界线以西降水量呈增加趋势，增加倾向率为0～27.11 mm/10 a的范围内；该界线以东降水量呈减少趋势，减少倾向率在0～80 mm/10 a的范围内。（4）岷江流域旱涝灾害阶段性变化趋势明显，1961—1967年涝灾频繁，1968—1972年干旱频率高，旱灾严重；1973—1993年涝灾频繁；1994—2012年旱灾程度与频次均呈增加趋势，旱灾严峻。（5）岷江流域旱涝灾害总体以1990年为转折点，1990年以前该区多涝灾，1990年后多旱灾，岷江流域由涝灾向旱灾转化的趋势明显，在未来一段时间应做好防旱抗旱工作。
- Abstract:
- Based on the monthly precipitation data of the 14 meteorological stations in Minjiang River Basin from 1961 to 2012, the spatiotemperal evolution characteristics of precipitation were analyzed by using the method of mathematical statistics combined with GIS spatial analysis technology, and the different scales of drought-flood were analyzed by using the standardized precipitation index (SPI). The results show that: (1) the mean annual precipitation significantly decreased in the past 52 years in Minjiang River Basin, the precipitation tendency rate was 20.18 mm/10 a; the annual average precipitation mutation occurred in 1993; (2) the precipitation in this basin showed a decreasing trend from southeast to northwest area, Songpan-Xiaojin-Kangding was recognized as the boundary, the annual precipitation was 616~1 000 mm in western area of the line; and 1 000~1 732 mm in east of the line; (3) the precipitation showed an increasing trend in western area of the Songpan-Xiaojin-Kangding, the precipitation tendency rate was 0~27.11 mm/10 a; the precipitation showed a decreasing trend in east of the boundary, decreasing trend rate was 0~80 mm/10 a; (4) there was an obvious flood to drought trend in Minjiang River Basin, it was waterlogging from 1961 to 1967, the frequency of droughts was high from 1968 to 1972, the floods were frequent from 1973 to 1993; the frequency and degree of droughts increased from 1994 to 2012; (5) It was waterlogging before 1990, and dry after 1990 in Minjiang River Basin, the trend in conversion of waterlogging to drought was obvious, so preventing and controlling drought work should be done in the next period.
参考文献/References:
[1] Zheng P N, Li Z Q, Bai Z P, et al. Influence of climate change to drought and flood[J]. Disaster Advances,2012,5(4):1331-1334.
[2] Marengo J A, Alves L M, Soares W R, et al. Two contrasting severe seasonal extremes in tropical south america in 2012:Flood in Amazonia and Drought in Northeast Brazil[J]. Journal of Climate,2013,26(22):9137-9154.
[3] Byun H R, Kang K A, Kim K H. Correlations between Nino-3 anomalies and Asian drought flood[J]. Journal of the Korean Meteorological Society,2001,37(5):453-464.
[4] Parry S, Marsh T, Kendon M. 2012:from drought to floods in England and Wales[J]. Weather,2013,68(10):268-274.
[5] 毕彩霞,穆兴民,赵广举,等.1960-2010年渭河流域旱涝时空分布特征[J].水土保持通报,2013,33(2):281-284,290.
[6] 杨志勇,袁喆,严登华,等.黄淮海流域旱涝时空分布及组合特性[J].水科学进展,2013,24(5):617-625.
[7] 赵学敏,胡彩虹,吴泽宁,等.汾河流域降水及旱涝时空结构特征[J].干旱区研究,2007,24(3):349-354.
[8] 叶笃正,黄荣辉.我国长江黄河两流域旱涝规律成因与预测研究的进展、成果与问题[J].地球科学进展,1991,6(4):24-29.
[9] 车少静,李春强,申双和.基于SPI的近41a(1965-2005)河北省旱涝时空特征分析[J].中国农业气象,2010,31(1):137-143,150.
[10] 陈莹,陈兴伟.福建省近50 a旱涝时空特征演变:基于标准化降水指数分析[J].自然灾害学报,2011,20(3):57-63.
[11] 李敏敏,延军平.全球变化下秦岭南北旱涝时空变化格局[J].资源科学,2013,35(3):638-645.
[12] 毛明策.近百年来关中平原旱涝振荡多尺度分析[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(3):40-43.
[13] 满正闯,苏春江,徐云,等.岷江上游森林涵养水源的能力变化分析[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(3):223-225,230.
[14] 王媛媛,张勃.基于标准化降水指数的近40 a陇东地区旱涝时空特征[J].自然资源学报,2012,27(12):2135-2144.
[15] 王志良,曹蕾.基于SPI的郑州市近60 a旱涝特征分析[J].华北水利水电学院学报,2011,32(6):30-32.
[16] Mckee T B, Doesken N J, Kleist J. The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales[R]. California:Eighth Conference on Applied Climatology,1993:179-184.
相似文献/References:
[1]蒋溢,李亦秋.岷江流域不同土地利用方式下紫色土壤活性有机碳分布特征及其影响因子[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(05):33.
JIANG Yi,LI Yiqiu.Labile Organic Carbon of Different Land Use Patterns in Minjiang River Basin, Sichuan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(01):33.
[2]张奇莹,徐盼盼,钱会.关中地区降水特征及其对旱涝灾害的影响[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(05):222.
ZHANG Qiying,XU Panpan,QIAN Hui.Characteristics of Precipitation and Its Influence on Drought and Flood Disaster in Guanzhong Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(01):222.
[3]邝美娟,谢红霞,隋兵,等.湖南省近50年降水特征分析[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(05):145.
KUANG Mei-juan,XIE Hong-xia,SUI Bing,et al.Analysis on Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Precipitation in Hu’nan Province from 1961 to 2010[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(01):145.
[4]胡尧,李懿,侯雨乐.不同土地利用方式对岷江流域土壤团聚体稳定性及有机碳的影响[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(04):22.
HU Yao,LI Yi,HOU Yule.Effects of Land Use Types on Stability and Organic Carbon of Soil Aggregates in Minjiang River Valley[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(01):22.
[5]李 懿,杨子松.岷江流域不同土地利用方式下的土壤微生物特征及其与土壤养分的关系[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(01):33.
LI Yi,YANG Zisong.Soil Nutrients and Soil Microbial Characteristics and Their Relationships Under Different Land Use Types in Minjiang River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(01):33.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2014-03-18;改回日期:2014-04-02。
基金项目:宜宾学院青年资助项目“岷江宜宾段水生态系统重金属含量与分布研究”（2008QJ34）
作者简介:杜华明(1977-),女,四川广元人,博士研究生,讲师,主要从事区域环境与灾害研究。E-mail:dhuaming2004@163.com