[1]罗忠志,高华端,李圆玥,等.长顺冗雷河小流域草地治理模式下土壤肥力评价[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(01):44-50.
　LUO Zhongzhi,GAO Huaduan,LI Yuanyue,et al.Soil Fertility Evaluation of the Small Ronglei River Watershed Under the Grassland Mode in Changshun County[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(01):44-50.
点击复制

长顺冗雷河小流域草地治理模式下土壤肥力评价

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 22 期数: 2015年01期 页码: 44-50 栏目: 出版日期: 2015-02-28
Title:
Soil Fertility Evaluation of the Small Ronglei River Watershed Under the Grassland Mode in Changshun County
作者:
罗忠志1, 高华端1, 李圆玥2, 孙泉忠2, 韦海霞3
1. 贵州大学 林学院, 贵阳 550025;
2. 贵州省水土保持技术咨询研究中心, 贵阳 550002;
3. 贵州省花溪区生态文明建设局, 贵阳 550025
Author(s):
LUO Zhongzhi1, GAO Huaduan1, LI Yuanyue2, SUN Quanzhong2, WEI Haixia3
1. College of Forestry College, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China;
2. Soil and Water Conservation Technical Consulting and Research Center of Guizhou Province, Guiyang 550002, China;
3. Huaxi District of Guiyang Ecological civilization Const
关键词:
土壤肥力草地模式; 层次分析法; 评价
Keywords:
soil fertility evaluation; grassland mode; analytic hierarchy proces(AHP); evaluation
分类号:
S157.1;P642.116
摘要:
采用野外调查和室内分析相结合的方法，对贵州省长顺县冗雷河小流域坡耕地、人工草地和天然草地3种地类的全氮和碱解氮，全磷和有效磷，全钾和有效钾，酸碱度，有机质进行了研究，以层次分析法进行肥力综合评价，揭示冗雷河小流域草地治理模式下对土壤肥力的影响。结果表明：坡耕地实施人工种草措施后，土壤全氮含量相对增加42.64%，碱解氮增加50.86%，中层和下层（20—30 cm）土壤碱解氮改善最为明显；土壤全磷含量相对增加45.24%，有效磷降低23.58%，坡耕地相比草地在全磷含量上相对较为匮乏，但用于作物吸收的有效磷素却高于人工草地；土壤全钾和有效钾含量降低，pH值无变化，其中全钾含量相对降低43.28%，有效钾降低37.32%；土壤有机质含量相对增加77.24%，其中表层（0—10 cm）、中层和下层土壤有机质含量分别提升48.06%，85.58%和107.78%，中层和下层土壤有机质含量改善幅度大。天然草地综合肥力指数最大，坡耕地最小，天然草地综合肥力指数是人工草地的1.09倍，是坡耕地的1.14倍，人工草地是坡耕地的1.05倍。土壤肥力整体水平上得到提升。
Abstract:
By means of fields investigation and lab experiments, based on the planted grassland, the nature grassland and the slope farmland of the small Ronglei river watershed in Changshun, we have examined soil total nitrogen and alkaline hydrolysis nitrogen, total phosphorus and available phosphorus, total potassium, available potassium, pH and the organic matter, revealed the influence of the grassland mode on the soil fertility, and comprehensively evaluated the soil fertility by analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in the small Ronglei river watershed in Changshun. The result showed that: after the artificial grass measures had been carried out, soil’s total nitrogen content of farmland relatively increased by 42.64%, alkali solution nitrogen increased by 50.86%, the improvement of alkali-hydrolysable nitrogen in the subsoil layer (20—30 cm) was the most obvious. The content of soil total phosphorus relatively increased 45.24%, available phosphorus increased by 23.58%, the contents of total phosphorus in the farmlands are relatively deficient if compared to grassland, but the level of available P used by crops was higher than that of artificial grassland; soil total potassium and available potassium contents of farmland decreased, pH values presented no significant change; the content of total potassium relatively decreased by 43.28%, available potassium decreased by 37.32%; the content of soil organic matter relatively increased by 77.24%, the contents of soil organic matter in topsoil (0—10 cm), middle, and the deep layers increased by 48.06%, 85.58% and 107.78%, respectively, there was great improvement in the levels of soil organic matter in middle and deep layers. The Integrated fertility index of natural grassland is the maximum and the slope farmland is the minimum. Fertility index of natural grassland is 1.09 times of the artificial grassland, fertility index of natural grassland is 1.14 times of the farmland artificial grass. Fertility index of farmland artificial grass is 1.05 times of the slope farmland. The overall level of soil fertility was improved.

参考文献/References:

[1] 刘震.全国水土保持普查及成果运用[J].中国水利,2013,37(7):55-57.
[2] 王念忠,李建伟,张峰.松花江流域侵蚀环境及水土流失防治对策[J].东北水利水电,2013,25(5):10-14,24.
[3] Middleton B. Wetland Restoration, Flood Pulsing, and Disturbance Dynamics[M]. New York:John Wiley & Sons, Inc.1999.
[4] 黎家作.淮河流域综合规划水土流失解读[M].长春:吉林科学技术出版社,2013.
[5] 李珂,杨永兴,杨杨,等.头屯河流域低山丘陵区水土流失防治对策[J].安徽农业学,2013,39(11):6714-6716,6719.
[6] 白军红,欧阳华,崔保山,等.水土流失防治对策探析[J].生态学报,2013,33(5):2246-2252.
[7] 刘红玉,白云芳.若尔盖水土流失防治变化过程与机制分析[J].自然资源学报,2006,21(5):810-818.
[8] 雍国玮,石承苍,邱鹏飞.浅议水土流失防治[J].山地学报,2013,21(6):758-762.
[9] 曾馥平,王克林.桂西北喀斯特地区6种退耕还林(草)模式的效应[J].农村生态环境2005,21(2):18-22.
[10] 吴佳海,牟琼,唐成斌,等.石漠化山区种草养羊技术开发[J].草业科学,2009,26(1):126-128.
[11] 瓦庆荣.加快石漠化地区草地植被恢复促进喀斯特地区生态环境建设[J].草业科学,2008,25(3):18-21.
[12] 高华端,孙泉忠,袁勇.喀斯特地区不同土地利用类型土壤侵蚀特征研究[J].水土保持通报,2010,30(2):92-96.
[13] 刘世梁,傅伯杰,马克明,等.岷江上游高原植被类型与景观特征对土壤性质的影响[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(1):26-30.
[14] 康冰,刘世荣,蔡道雄,等.南亚热带不同植被恢复模式下土壤理化性质[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(10):2479-2486.
[15] 罗海波,钱晓刚,刘方,等.喀斯特山区退耕还林(草)保持水土生态效益研究[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(4):31-34,41.
[16] 代全厚,张力,刘艳军,等.嫩江大堤植物根系固土护堤功能研究[J].水土保持通报,1998,18(6):8-11.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘建,何宗,张治清.基于GIS的蒲江县生态环境综合评价研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):130.
　LIU Jian,HE Zong,ZHANG Zhi-qing.The Research of Comprehensive Evaluation of the Ecological Environment Based on GIS in Pujiang County[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(01):130.
[2]刘琳,余莉,李正,等.基于改进模糊层次模型的土地整理效益评价研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(03):204.
　LIU Lin,YU Li,LI Zheng,et al.Study on the Evaluation of Integrated Benefit of Land Consolidation Based on Ameliorate Fuzzy AHP[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(01):204.
[3]聂庆华.耕地生产潜力计算中土壤效应系数的评估——以陕西省洛川县为例[J].水土保持研究,1992,(02):55.
　Nie Qinghua.THE EVALUATION OF SOIL EFFECTIVE COFFICIENT IN CALCULATION OF THE POTENTIAL PRODUCTIVITY OF CULTIVATED LAND——With Luochuan County as an Example[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1992,(01):55.
[4]李相玺,左长清,姚毅臣,等.花岗岩侵蚀区植被层次结构优化模式研究[J].水土保持研究,1997,4(01):202.
　Li Xiangxi,Zuo Changqing,Yao Yichen,et al.Research on the Optimization of Vegetation Stratum Structure in the Granite Soil Eroded Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1997,4(01):202.
[5]鞠远江,曾思伟,刘耕年.泥石流沟最优治理方案选择的层次分析法模型[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(03):52.
　JU Yuan-jiang,ZENG Si-wei,LIU Geng-nian.AHP Model Decides the Most Suited Controlling Scheme to Special Debris Flow Gully[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2003,10(01):52.
[6]安韶山,黄懿梅,刘梦云,等.宁南宽谷丘陵区土壤肥力质量对生态恢复的响应[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(03):22.
　AN Shao-shan,HUANG Yi-mei,LIU Meng-yun,et al.The Responses of Soil Fertility Quality to Ecological Rehabilitation in Ningxia Loess Hilly-gully Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(01):22.
[7]刘梦云,安韶山,常庆瑞,等.宁南山区不同土地利用方式土壤质量评价[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(03):35.
　LIU Meng-yun,AN Shao-shan,CHANG Qing-rui,et al.Soil Quality Evaluation Under Different Land Use in Southern Ningxia Mountain Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(01):35.
[8]刘梦云,安韶山,常庆瑞,等.宁南山区不同土地利用方式土壤质量评价方法研究[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(03):41.
　LIU Meng-yun,AN Shao-shan,CHANG Qing-rui,et al.Method of Soil Quality Evaluation Under Different Land Use in Southern Ningxia Mountain Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(01):41.
[9]李苏楠,赵延治,史培军.西藏高原生态安全评价方法与应用—以西藏自治区曲松县为例[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(06):142.
　LI Su-nan,ZHAO Yan-zhi,SHI Pei-jun.Method and Application of Ecological Security Analysis in Tibet Plateau——A Case Study in Qusum County[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(01):142.
[10]李林,付强,贺延国.模糊物元模型在新疆农业水资源可持续利用评价中的应用[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(04):46.
　LI Lin,FU Qiang,HE Yan-guo.Fuzzy Matterelement Model for Evaluating Sustainable Utilization of Agriculture Water Resources in Xinjiang[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(01):46.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2014-11-07;改回日期:2014-11-19。
基金项目:草海流域受损生态系统治理技术与示范（2011BAC02B0203-03）；贵州省喀斯特生态与环境专业学位研究生工作站；贵州省水利厅水利科技经费项目（KT201311）；贵州省水利厅水利科技经费项目（KT201202）
作者简介:罗忠志(1987-),男,贵州大方县人,硕士,主要研究方向:区域土壤侵蚀与评价。E-mail:1340376436@qq.com
通讯作者:高华端(1965-),男,贵州省织金县人,教授,博士,硕士研究生导师,主要研究方向:区域水土保持与环境。E-mail:399965122@qq.com

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01