LI Hua-tan,ZHAO Yu-jiao,LI Guo-rong,et al.Experimental Research on Slope Protection with Vegetation under Situ Rainfall Simulation in Cold and Arid Environment of Loess Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(06):304-311.
寒旱环境黄土区植物护坡原位模拟降雨试验研究
- Title:
- Experimental Research on Slope Protection with Vegetation under Situ Rainfall Simulation in Cold and Arid Environment of Loess Area
- Keywords:
- loess area; vegetation slope; rainfall simulation; runoff; soil erosion
- 分类号:
- P642.5
- 摘要:
- 在自建试验区内为研究植物护坡水文效应，本项研究采用野外模拟降雨试验的方法，分别对种植柠条锦鸡儿（Caragana korshinskii Kom.）、霸王（Zygophyllum xanthoxylon Bunge Maxim.）2种灌木植物边坡和种植垂穗披碱草（Elymus nutans Griseb.）、细茎冰草（Agropyron trachycaulum Linn. Gaertn.）2种草本植物边坡，以及作为对照组未种植植物的裸坡开展相同试验条件的模拟降雨试验。试验结果表明，在相同试验条件下裸坡的稳定径流量和泥沙量均相对较大其值为450.0～475.0 ml/min，8.28～8.36 g/min；种植霸王、柠条锦鸡儿边坡稳定径流量和泥沙量为307.0～355.5 ml/min，3.12～4.07 g/min；种植细茎冰草边坡、垂穗披碱草边坡稳定径流量和泥沙量为24.0～41.3 ml/min，1.52～2.40 g/min，该试验结果说明了坡面产生的稳定径流量和稳定泥沙量与边坡的覆盖度之间呈负相关关系以外，还进一步反映出种植草本植物的边坡其坡面产生的稳定径流量、泥沙量则显著小于种植灌木植物边坡，即种植灌木边坡其坡面产生稳定径流量、泥沙量分别是种植草本边坡的1.338～1.466倍、2.054～2.654倍；裸坡坡面以下0—20 cm处及坡面以下20—40 cm处含水率增幅分别为38.94%，11.08%；种植柠条锦鸡儿、霸王边坡坡面以下相同深度处的a层、b层含水率增幅为42.24%～44.19%，10.63%～11.76%，种植垂穗披碱草、细茎冰草边坡坡面以下相同深度处的a层、b层含水率增幅为47.27%～48.11%，13.98%～14.74%，坡面以下40—60 cm处的（c层）含水率变化相对不显著，表明在边坡种植的草本和灌木植物，在降雨坡面雨水入渗的过程中，阻止和减少了坡面径流的形成，同时亦反映出生长草本植物的边坡其阻止和减少坡面径流形成的作用相对显著于灌木植物；裸坡的径流系数为63.40%，种植柠条锦鸡儿和霸王边坡径流系数则分别为18.00%和20.33%，细茎冰草和垂穗披碱草径流系数分别为6.57%和1.71%，草本植物边坡径流系数相对最小，反映出草本植物其抵挡坡面雨水冲刷和侵蚀以及抑制地表径流作用等方面较灌木植物显著。
- Abstract:
- To study the hydrological effects of slope protection with vegetation, we carried out the method of situ rainfall simulation on the slopes covered by two shrubs Caragana korshinskii Kom, Zygophyllum xanthonylon (Bunge) Maxim and on the slopes planted with 2 herbs Elymus nutans Griseb, Agropyron trachycaulum (Linn.) Gaertn, as well as on the control slopes without vegetation under the same test conditions. The results show that the stable runoff and sediment flux of the bare slope under the same test conditions are relatively bigger, the values are 450.0～475.0 ml/min and 8.28～8.36 g/min, respectively; the stable runoff and sediment fluxes of the slopes planted with Zygophyllum xanthonylon, Caragana korshinskii are 307.0～355.5 ml/min and 3.12～4.07 g/min, respectively; the stable runoff and sediment fluxes of the slopes planted with Agropyron trachycaulum, Elymus nutans are 24.0～41.3 ml/min and 1.52～2.40 g/min, respectively. The data show that stable runoff and sediment flux are negatively related with slope vegetation coverage. Further studies show that the stable runoff and sediment flux of the slopes planted with herbs are significantly less than the slopes planted with shrubs, and the stable runoff and sediment flux of the slopes planted with shrubs is 1.338～1.466 times, 2.054～2.654 times of the slopes planted with herbs. The the increment rates of soil moisture contents in the layer(0—20 cm) and the layer(20—40 cm) are 38.94% and 11.08%, respectively; at the same depth, the increment rates of soil moisture contents of the slopes covered with Caragana korshinskii, Zygophyllum xanthonylon are 42.24%～44.19% and 10.63%～11.76%, respectively; and those of the slopes planted with Elymus nutans, Agropyron trachycaulum of at the same depth are 47.27%～48.11% and 13.98%～14.74%, respectively; the soil moisture content change in the layer (40—60 cm) is not significant. The data show that planting vegetation in the slopes can effectively prevent and reduce the slope runoff generation during the process of rainfall infiltration, and the effect of herb is more significant than that of the shrub in terms of reducing the runoff yield. The runoff coefficient of bare slope is 63.40%, for slopes planted with Caragana korshinskii and Zygophyllum xanthonylon the runoff coefficients are 18.00% and 20.33%, respectively and for slopes planted with Agropyron trachycaulum and Elymus nutans are 6.57% and 1.71%, respectively. The runoff coefficient of the slopes with herbs is relatively less than that of the slopes with shrubs, which indicates that the inhibitory role of herbs in resisting rain erosion and soil erosion and surface runoff is more significant than shrubs.
参考文献/References:
[1] 陈洪松,邵明安.黄土区坡地土壤水分运动与转化机理研究进展[J].水科学进展,2003,14(4):513-520.
[2] 彭辉.黄土高原流域生态水文模拟和植被生态用水计算[D].北京:中国水利水电科学研究院,2013.
[3] 包含,侯立柱,刘江涛,等.室内模拟降雨条件下土壤水分入渗及再分布试验[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(7):70-75.
[4] 周佩华,王占礼.黄土高原土壤侵蚀暴雨的研究[J].水土保持学报,1992,6(3):1-5.
[5] 孙建中,赵景波.黄土高原第四纪[M].北京:科学出版社,1991.
[6] 黄土高原区域治理与评价[M].北京:科学出版社,1992.
[7] Fu B, Chen L, Ma K, et al. The relationships between land use and soil conditions in the hilly area of the Loess Plateau in northern Shaanxi, China[J]. Catena, 2000,39(1):69-78.
[8] 卢金发,黄秀花.黄河中游土地利用变化对输沙的影响[J].地理研究,2003,22(5):571-578.
[9] 朱冰冰,李占斌,李鹏,等.草本植物覆盖对坡面降雨径流侵蚀影响的试验研究[J].土壤学报,2010,43(3):401-407.
[10] 周德培,张俊云.植被护坡工程技术[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2003.
[11] 骆汉,赵廷宁,彭贤锋,等.公路边坡绿化覆盖物水土保持效果试验研究[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(5):63-70.
[12] 韦红波,李锐,杨勤科.我国植被水土保持功能研究进展[J].植物生态学报,2002,26(4):489-496.
[13] Kusumandari A, Mitchell B. Soil erosion and sediment yield in forest and agroforestry areas in west Java, Indonesia[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1997,52(5):376-380.
[14] 罗伟祥,白立强,宋西德,等.不同覆盖度林地和草地的径流量与冲刷量[J].水土保持学报,1990,4(1):30-35.
[15] 余新晓,张晓明,武思宏,等.黄土区林草植物与降水对坡面径流和侵蚀产沙的影响[J].山地学报,2006,24(1):19-26.
[16] 张启龙,杨刚.西宁盆地第三系地层对工程的影响[J].铁道勘察,2010(1):31-33.
[17] 杨东,王慧,程军奇,等.近50年青海省气候变化特征及其与ENSO的关系[J].生态环境学报,2013,22(4):547-553.
[18] 马汝忠.近50年西宁地区雷暴日气候变化特征分析[J].青海气象,2009(2):15-18.
[19] 杨占凤,乔娜,李臻,等.西宁盆地周边灌木植物护坡水文效应影响要素研究[J].工程地质学报,2010,18(S):463-467.
[20] 卢龙彬,付强,黄金柏.黄土高原北部水蚀风蚀交错区产流条件及径流系数[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(4):17-23.
[21] 张光辉,梁一民.植被盖度对水土保持功效影响的研究综述[J].水土保持研究,1996,3(2):104-110.
[22] 贾莲莲,李占斌,李鹏,等.黄土区野外模拟降雨条件下坡面径流-产沙试验研究[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(1):1-5.
[23] 陈洪松,邵明安,张兴昌,等.野外模拟降雨条件下坡面降雨入渗,产流试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(2):5-8.
[24] 武晟,汪志荣,张建丰,等.不同下垫面径流系数与雨强及历时关系的实验研究[J].中国农业大学学报,2006,11(5):55-59.
相似文献/References:
[1]赵鹏宇,徐学选.黄土区不同土地经营方式径流量神经网络模拟[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(03):227.
ZHAO Peng-yu,XU Xue-xuan.Runoff Simulated with Neural Network under Different Management Patterns in Loess Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(06):227.
[2]穆兴民,陈国良,Hidenori Takahashi,等.黄土区基本环境要素变化对丘陵地形的响应[J].水土保持研究,1998,5(01):7.
Mu Xingmin,Chen Guoliang,Hidenori Takahashi,et al.The Response of the Distributions of the Basic Eco-environmental Elements to the Loess Hilly Landform of the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1998,5(06):7.
[3]杨文文,张学培,王洪英.晋西黄土区刺槐蒸腾、光合与水分利用的试验研究[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(01):72.
YANG Wen-wen,ZHANG Xue-pei,WANG Hong-ying.Study on Robinia pseudoscacia L.Transpiration, Photosynthesis and Water Use Efficiency[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(06):72.
[4]吕春娟,白中科,秦俊梅,等.黄土区大型排土场岩土侵蚀特征研究——以平朔矿区排土场为例[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(04):233.
LV Chun-juan,BAI Zhong-ke,QIN Jun-mei,et al.Research on the Characteristics of Rock and Soil Erosion of the Large Stackpile in Loess Area——Taking Opencast-mine Area of Pingshuo as an Example[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(06):233.
[5]李笑吟,毕华兴,张建军,等.晋西黄土区土壤水分有效性研究[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(05):205.
LI Xiao-yin,BI Hua-xing,ZHANG Jian-jun,et al.Study on the Validity of Soil Noisture in Loess Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(06):205.
[6]刘鑫,毕华兴,李笑吟,等.晋西黄土区土壤水分时空异质性分析[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(06):51.
LIU Xin,BI Hua-xing,LI Xiao-yin,et al.Study on Temporal and Spatial Heterogeneity of Soil Moisture Using Geological Statistics Method on Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(06):51.
[7]王海龙,秦富仓,余新晓,等.黄土区森林植被对不同尺度坡地产流产沙的影响分析[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(03):182.
WANG Hai-long,QIN Fu-cang,YU Xin-xiao,et al.Effect of Forest Vegetation on Runoff and Sediment Production in Sloping Lands at Different Scales of Loess Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(06):182.
[8]李孝广,余新晓,张振明,等.黄土区土壤水分与植物耗水研究[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(05):336.
LI Xiao-guang,YU Xin-xiao,ZHANG Zhen-ming,et al.Study on Soil Water and the Plant Water Consumption in the Loess Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(06):336.
[9]杨锋伟,陈丽华,朱清科,等.晋西黄土区主要造林树种耗水特性分析[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(01):41.
YANG Feng-wei,CHEN Li-hua,ZHU Qing-ke,et al.Analysis of Water Consumption of Main Afforestation Species in Western Shanxi of Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(06):41.
[10]陈丽华,鲁绍伟,张学培,等.晋西黄土区主要造林树种林地土壤水分生态条件分析[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(01):79.
CHEN Li-hua,LU Shao-wei,ZHANG Xue-pei,et al.Analysis of Soil Water Content of Main Afforestation Species in Western Shanxi of Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(06):79.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2014-05-29;改回日期:2014-07-06。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目（41162010）；教育部长江学者和创新团队发展计划资助（IRT13074）；青海省重点科研攻关资助项目（2003-N-134）
作者简介:李华坦(1989-),男,河南太康人,硕士研究生,主要从事环境岩土工程与岩土体工程稳定数值模拟等方面的研究工作。E-mail:huatan2008@126.com
通讯作者:胡夏嵩(1965-),男,河南开封人,教授,博士,主要从事地质工程与环境地质等领域的教学和研究工作。E-mail:huxiasong@tsinghua.org.cn