HAN Mu-wen,ZHUANG Zhu-zhou,MA Chao,et al.Evaluation for Benefit in Ecological Shelter Area Based on Ecological Green Equivalent Weight—Example of Shelter Area in Yanchi County[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(06):211-217.
基于生态绿当量的生态移民区生态效益评价——以盐池县移民区为例
- Title:
- Evaluation for Benefit in Ecological Shelter Area Based on Ecological Green Equivalent Weight—Example of Shelter Area in Yanchi County
- Keywords:
- ecological benefit; evaluation; green equivalent; ecological environment in shelter area; Yanchi County
- 分类号:
- X171.1
- 摘要:
- 以宁夏盐池县花马池镇的四个生态移民区为研究对象，进行生态移民区生态效益评价。应用2008年SPOT卫星遥感影像和2013年无人机航摄影像，首先对研究区5 a间土地利用变化进行监测与分析；其次应用生态绿当量评价模型进行生态移民研究区生态效益评价。研究显示：（1）2008—2013年5 a间研究区的生态绿当量均有所提高，生态环境有改善；（2）2008年和2013年研究区域的生态绿当量均低于1，移民区生态环境仍较为脆弱；（3）研究区森林覆盖率低于联合国最低值20%，高于环保部生态县15%的覆盖率，基于生态绿当量森林覆盖率与最佳森林覆盖率有很大的差距，表明研究区土地利用方面仍需调整，需加大保护生态恢复措施力度，继续实行封山育林禁牧、退耕还林等措施制度。
- Abstract:
- The paper evaluates the ecological benefits in ecology shelter based on the research about four ecology shelters in Hua Machi town of Yanchi County, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region. SPOT satellite remote sensing image in 2008 and UAV aerial image in 2013 were used to monitor and analyze the change of land application in the research area, then the ecological benefits in the area were evaluated by ecological green equivalent evaluation model. The results showed that the ecological green equivalent weight in research area had increased from 2008 to 2013, which meant that the ecological environment was improved; the ecological green equivalent weight in research area was still less than 1 in 2008 and 2013, which showed the ecological environment in shelter area was relatively weak at present; the forest coverage rate in research area was 20%, less than minimum value of UN standard, and that was higher than the coverage rate (15%) which environment-protection department required ecology county to meet. The forest coverage rate based on green equivalent weight had a large gap behind the best forest coverage rate, which indicated that the land use in the research area need more adjustment. More efforts should be made for ecology protection and restoration. Essential methods such as closing hillsides to facilitate forestation, banning raising livestock on hills, and returning the grain plots to forestry are all supposed to be continued.
参考文献/References:
[1] 马莉娅,吴斌,张宇清,等.基于生态足迹的宁夏盐池县生态安全评价[J].干旱区资源与环境,2011,25(5):57-62.
[2] 杨显明,米文宝,齐拓野,等.宁夏生态移民效益评价研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2013,27(4):16-21.
[3] 岳耀杰,闫维娜,王秀红,等.区域生态退耕对生态系统服务价值的影响:以宁夏盐池为例[J].干旱区资源与环境,2014,28(2):60-68.
[4] 刘军利,秦富仓,岳永杰,等.内蒙古伊金霍洛旗风沙区退耕还林还草生态效益评价[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(5):104-107.
[5] 钟兆站.中国海岸带自然灾害与环境评估[J].地理科学进展,1997,16(1):44-50.
[6] 杜灵通,李国旗.基于SPOT-VGT的宁夏盐池县近8年生态环境动态监测[J].北京林业大学学报,2008,30(5):46-51.
[7] 夏照华,张克斌,李瑞,等.基于NDVI的农牧交错区植被覆盖度变化研究:以宁夏盐池县为例[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(6):178-181.
[8] 国家测绘局.低空数字航空摄影规范[S].CH/Z 3005-2010.
[9] 王重玲,朱志玲,王梅梅,等.基于生态服务价值的宁夏隆德县生态补偿研究[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(1):208-212.
[10] 罗志军,张军.生态绿当量及其在土地利用结构优化中的应用:以江西省新建县为例[J].江西农业大学学报,2007,29(5):851-856.
[11] Jim C Y. Managing urban trees and their soil envelopes in a contiguously developed city environment[J]. Environmental Management,2001,28(6):819-832.
[12] 牛继强,徐丰.基于RS与生态绿当量的土地利用结构优化研究[J].信阳师范学院学报:自然科学版,2009,22(3):410-413.
[13] 毛永文.生态环境影响评价概论[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2003.
[14] 刘艳芳,明冬萍.基于生态绿当量的土地利用结构优化[J].武汉大学学报:信息科学版,2002,27(5):493-498.
[15] 张健,陈林武.最佳防护效益森林覆盖率定量探讨[J].林业科学,1996,32(4):317-324.
[16] 宫渊波,陈林武.四川盆地低山丘陵区县级最佳防护效益森林覆盖率定量研究[J].四川农业大学学报,1996,14(2):231-236.
[17] 胡华科,郑春燕.土地利用变化的环境影响生态绿当量评价:以梅州市为例[J].农业现代化研究,2008,29(6):743-746.
[18] 赵丹,李锋,王如松.基于生态绿当量的城市土地利用结构优化:以宁国市为例[J].生态学报,2011,31(20):6242-6250.
相似文献/References:
[1]薛春璐,郑新奇,周伟,等.青海省海西州区域用地集约利用评价研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):142.
XUE Chun-lu,ZHENG Xin-qi,ZHOU Wei,et al.Evaluation of Intensive Land Use of State Haixi in Qinghai Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(06):142.
[2]熊康宁,王恒松,刘云.毕节石桥小流域水土保持综合治理生态监测与效益评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):10.
XIONG Kang-ning,WANG Heng-song,LIU Yun.Ecological Monitoring and the Evaluation on the Benefits of Comprehensive Management for Soil and Water Conservation in Shiqiao Watershed of Bijie City, Guizhou Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(06):10.
[3]李兰花,孙树光,朱金兆,等.北京市低山区水土保持林评价与分级[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):134.
LI Lan-hua,SUN Shu-guang,ZHU Jing-zhao,et al.Evaluation and Classification on Forest for Soil and Water Conservation in Low Mountain Area of Beijing City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(06):134.
[4]杨春红,张正栋,田楠楠,等.基于P-S-R模型的汕头市土地生态安全评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(03):209.
YANG Chun-hong,ZHANG Zheng-dong,TIAN Nan-nan,et al.Evaluation on Land Ecological Security in Shantou Based on P-S-R Model[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(06):209.
[5]安静,刘红玉,郝敬锋,等.南京仙林新市区景观生态质量变化研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(02):231.
AN Jing,LIU Hong-yu,HAO Jing-feng,et al.Study on the Change of Landscape Ecological Quality in Xianlin New City of Nanjing[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(06):231.
[6]郭兰勤,杨勤科.藉河流域水土保持效益评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(01):139.
GUO Lan-qin,YANG Qin-ke.Evaluation on the Benefit of the Soil and Water Conservation in Jihe Watershed[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(06):139.
[7]孙奇奇,宋戈,齐美玲.基于主成分分析的哈尔滨市土地生态安全评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(01):234.
SUN Qi-qi,SONG Ge,QI Mei-ling.Analysis of Land Ecological Safety Evaluation of Harbin City Based on Principal Component Analysis[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(06):234.
[8]王忠林.渭北旱塬林农复合植被类型的生态和经济效益调查研究[J].水土保持研究,1994,1(03):36.
Wang Zhonglin.A study on eco-econmic Benefits of Forest and agriculture Compounded Vegetation-types in arid mesa of northern area of Weihe river[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1994,1(06):36.
[9]吴国清.崇明岛土壤资源评价初探[J].水土保持研究,1995,2(01):9.
Wu Guoqing.Pring Research the Soil Resoure Evaluation on Chongming Island[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1995,2(06):9.
[10]胡建忠.山杨混交类型生产力及土壤质量综合评价[J].水土保持研究,1995,2(01):44.
Hu Jianzhong.Integrative Evaluation on Soil Quality and productivity of Populus davidiana Dode Mixed Forest[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1995,2(06):44.
[11]杨婷婷,吴新宏,李鹏,等.草原沙化治理工程生态效益快速评价体系研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(06):119.
YANG Ting-ting,WU Xin-hong,LI Peng,et al.The Study on Ecological Benefit Evaluation Index System of Grassland Desertification Control Project[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(06):119.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2014-03-20;改回日期:2014-04-23。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目（41161081）
作者简介:韩沐汶(1993-),男,宁夏银川人,本科生,主要研究方向为遥感与地理信息系统应用。E-mail:hanmuwen@163.com
通讯作者:石云(1977-),女,宁夏银川人,博士,副教授,主要从事遥感与地理信息系统应用研究。E-mail:shiyun@nxu.edu.cn