ZHENG Yan-ru,ZHENG Yan-dong,GE Jing-feng,et al.Implementation Evaluation of the General Land Use Planning of Hebei Province Based on the Ecological Footprint Model[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(05):230-235.
基于生态足迹模型的河北省土地利用总体规划实施评价
- Title:
- Implementation Evaluation of the General Land Use Planning of Hebei Province Based on the Ecological Footprint Model
- 分类号:
- F301.23
- 摘要:
- 为了证实河北省土地利用总体规划（2006—2020年）确定的土地利用结构调控指标是否科学与合理，根据1999—2008年的统计数据，运用改进的生态足迹模型计算并预测河北省2010年、2020年人均生态足迹、人均生态承载力，将预测结果与河北省土地利用总体规划（2006—2020年）确定的土地利用结构调整目标测算的人均生态承载力进行比较。结果表明：（1）河北省人均生态足迹1999—2008年共增加0.218 1 hm2，增长率达到32.18%，人均生态承载力共增加0.019 8 hm2，增长幅度为28.09%，人均生态赤字由2006年增长到最大值0.450 2 hm2 后回落至2008年的0.418 8 hm2，表明河北省正朝着降低生态赤字，提高生态承载力的方向进行。（2）根据预测值与规划确定值相比较可知，2010年人均生态承载力的实际发展将会比规划预期增加0.16%，人均生态赤字减少0.18%，2020年人均生态承载力的实际发展将会比规划预期增加18.41%，人均生态赤字减少6.29%，说明本轮规划的预计生态供给均可实现。河北省土地利用总体规划（2006—2020年）的实施将会降低人均生态赤字，体现了规划确定的土地利用结构调控指标的科学与合理性，一定程度上遏制了土地生态环境的恶化趋势，促使生态环境向有利的方向发展。
- Abstract:
- This research purpose is to confirm whether the adjustment goal of land-use structure determined by Hebei general land use planning (2006—2020) is scientific and reasonable. According to the statistical data from 1999 to 2008, optimized model of ecological footprint was used to calculate and predict the ecological footprint per capita and the current ecological carrying capacity per capita of Hebei Province in 2010 and 2020.The prediction results were compared with the per capita ecological carrying capacity which was calculated by land use structure adjustment target of Hebei general land use planning (2006—2020).The data from 1999 to 2008 in Hebei Province showed that: (1) the per capita ecological footprint had totally increased 0.218 1 hm2 and the growth rate reached up to 32.18%, the per capita ecological carrying capacity increased 0.019 8 hm2 and the growth amplitude reached to 28.09 %, the per capita ecological deficit rose to a maximum of 0.450 hm2 in 2006 and fell to 0.418 8 hm2 in 2008, In short, the ecological deficit will be reducing and the ecological carrying capacity will be improving in Hebei Province in the future; (2) according to the forecast value and the planning phase to determine the value of the comparison, the per capita ecological carrying capacity development in 2010 will increase by 0.16% compared with the expected plan, the per capita ecological deficit decreased 0.18%, the per capita ecological carrying capacity of the actual development will increase 18.41% in 2020 compared to the expected planned, the per capita ecological deficit reduction is 6.29%, indicating that the current round of planning eco-expected supply can be realized. The implementation of Hebei general land use planning (2006—2020) will reduce the per capita ecological deficit what embodies science and rationality of land use structure adjustment target. It presented the trend of the land ecological environment deterioration in some degree and promoted the ecological environment development to the favorable direction.
参考文献/References:
[1] 符海月,李满春,毛亮,等.基于生态足迹的土地利用规划生态成效定量分析:以河北省廊坊市为例[J].自然资源学报,2007,22(2):225-235.
[2] 赖力,黄贤金.全国土地利用总体规划目标的生态足迹评价研究[J].农业工程学报,2005,30(2):66-71.
[3] 岳东霞,李自珍,惠苍.甘肃省生态足迹和生态承载力发展趋势研究[J].西北植物学报,2004,24(3):454-463.
[4] 张新.武汉市生态可持续发展的分析与评价[J].统计与决策,2007,23(3):81-83.
[5] William R. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity:what urban economics leaves out[J]. Environment and Urbanization,1992,4(2):121-130.
[6] Rees W, Wackernagel M. Urban ecological footprints:why cities cannot be sustainable-and why they are a key to sustainability[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review,1996,16(4):223-248.
[7] Wackernagel M, Onisto L, Bello P, et al. Ecological Footprints of Nations[R]. Commissioned by the Earth Council for the RIO+5Forum. International council for local Environmental Initiatives. Toronto,1997:10-21.
[8] Wackernagel M, Onisto L, Bello P, et al. National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept[J]. Ecological Economics, 1999,29(3):375-390.
[9] 白钰,曾辉,魏建兵,等.基于环境污染账户核算的生态足迹模型优化:以珠江三角洲城市群为例[J].应用生态学报,2008,19(8):1789-1796.
[10] 谭波,傅瓦利.基于生态足迹的巫山县土地承载力研究[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(5):105-113.
[11] 王洪波.基于改进型生态足迹模型的北京市生态足迹分析与评价[D].北京:首都经济贸易大学,2013.
[12] 白钰.基于生态足迹的天津市土地利用总体规划生态效用评价[J].经济地理,2012,32(10):127-132.
[13] 曹宝,秦其明,王秀波,等.生态足迹改进模型在可持续发展评价中的应用研究[J].生态环境,2007,16(3):968-972.
相似文献/References:
[1]王鹏,庄大昌.衡阳市生态足迹分析与生态环境保护对策[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(02):246.
WANG Peng,ZHUANG Da-chang.An Analysis of Ecological Footprint in Hengyang City and Ecological Environment Protection[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(05):246.
[2]易璐,王红梅,程迎轩,等.基于空间吻合性的土地利用总体规划实施评价——以珠海市斗门区为例[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(06):108.
YI Lu,WANG Hongmei,CHENG Yingxuan,et al.Implementation Evaluation of General Land Use Plan Based on Spatial Concordance—A Case of Doumen District in Zhuhai City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(05):108.
[3]杨坡,何多兴,田永中,等.土地利用总体规划生态环境影响空间评价——以重庆市南川区为例[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(01):215.
YANG Po,HE Duo-xing,TIAN Yong-zhong,et al.Spatial Evaluation on Ecological and Environmental Impact of the Overall Land-use Planning—A Case Study of Nanchuan District, Chongqing City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(05):215.
[4]李艳峰,雷国平.基于生态系统服务功能价值方法的土地利用总体规划环境影响评价研究——以大庆市为例[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(05):305.
LI Yan-feng,LEI Guo-ping.Environmental Impact Assessment of Land Use Planning Based on Ecosystem Services Value—A Case Study of Daqing City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(05):305.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2014-01-22;改回日期:2014-03-22。
基金项目:国土资源部公益性行业科研专项项目“环渤海盐碱土地景观整治与植物修复技术集成”（201311060）
作者简介:郑艳茹(1988-),女(满族),河北遵化人,硕士研究生,研究方向为资源评价与可持续利用。E-mail:zhengyanru126@126.com
通讯作者:葛京凤(1958-),女,河北乐亭人,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为资源评价与可持续利用研究。E-mail:gejingfeng@mail.hebtu.edu.cn