[1]范辰辰,许模,王梅,等.川南叙大铁路沿线岩溶区伏流、暗河对比分析[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(02):264-268.
　FAN Chen-chen,XU Mo,WANG Mei,et al.Comparative Analysis on the Disappearance of River and Underground River along the Xuda Railway in the South of Sichuan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(02):264-268.
点击复制

川南叙大铁路沿线岩溶区伏流、暗河对比分析

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 21 期数: 2014年02期 页码: 264-268 栏目: 出版日期: 2014-04-28
Title:
Comparative Analysis on the Disappearance of River and Underground River along the Xuda Railway in the South of Sichuan Province
作者:
范辰辰1, 许模1, 王梅1, 赵瑞1, 叶咸1, 夏雪萍2
1. 成都理工大学 地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室, 成都 610059;
2. 四川省蜀通岩土工程公司, 成都 610000
Author(s):
FAN Chen-chen1, XU Mo1, WANG Mei1, ZHAO Rui1, YE Xian1, XIA Xue-ping2
1. State Key Laboratory of Geological Disaster Prevention and Geological Environmental Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China;
2. Sichuan Shutong Geotechnical Engineering Company, Chengdu 610000, China
关键词:
水文地质; 对比分析; 川南; 伏流; 暗河
Keywords:
hydrogeology; comparative analysis; south Sichuan; disappearance of river; underground river
分类号:
X143;TV131.2
摘要:
伏流与暗河均属地下暗流，是两种极为相似的现代地貌。虽然二者最终都以地下河出口的形式排泄出露，但实为不同的岩溶水文地质现象。伏流是地表水在岩溶地区的管道状潜伏段，而暗河是具有河流主要特征的岩溶水地下管道。通常在生产生活中并未严格界定，且已有研究大多也只对其概念进行了区分，二者的各项属性有何差异却鲜有提及。该文详细分析了川南古叙岩溶区14条伏流，24条暗河各要素，包括：出口出露高程、发育层位、构造、所属水系、水化学和空间展布。通过对各因子的统计后发现，伏流和暗河之间存在较大差异性，且主要体现在出口出露高程、所属构造、水系、水化学和空间展布5个方面，并在统计结果的基础上分析各差异性产生的原因。这对于维持区内生态环境平衡，合理开发、利用地下河系，展开专水专用等具有重要意义。
Abstract:
Both the disappearance of river and underground river are underground currents and the similar modern landscape. Though both of them drain in form of underground-flowing river exit, they are the different Karst hydrogeological phenomenon. Disappearance of river is the disappearance part of river in karst area while the underground river is the underground pipes with the main characteristics of river in karst area. They usually do not distinguish strictly in production and living and the only study about them is limited to the concepts, rarely studying about their characteristic differences. This paper analyzed 6 characteristics of 14 disappearance of river and 24 underground river, including the elevation of exit, stratum, structure, river system, water chemistry and space distribution. Based on the statistical results, there are large differences between them, especially in the elevation of exit, structure, river system, water chemistry and space distribution. Then this paper analyzes the reason for the existence of the differences. This result is helpful for maintaining the ecological environment balance, developing and making use of water resources effectively.

参考文献/References:

[1] 杨益才,徐守平,杨昌辉,等.喀斯特伏流河段建库主要工程地质问题[J].地球与环境,2005,33(3):83-89.
[2] GB12329-90.岩溶地质术语[S].1990.
[3] 李孝颐,张忠举,王正中,等.四川省筠连幅H-48-(33)叙永幅H-48-(34)区域水文地质普查报告[M].四川省地质局二0八地质队,1980:27-28.
[4] 陈叙伦,刘世青.川南喀斯特发育史探讨[J].成都地质学院学报,1984(2):44-52.
[5] 李扬红,邓英尔,于静,等.五指山隧道岩溶发育及涌水的特征研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(2):138-141.
[6] 王中美,廖义玲,李明琴,等.贵阳市水文地质条件及环境效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(1):226-233.
[7] 杨益才,徐守平,杨昌辉,等.喀斯特伏流河段建库主要工程地质问题[J].地球与环境,2005,33(3):83-89.
[8] 王迪,许模,漆继红,等.滇东南丘北区峰丛-洼地地貌形态特征分析[J].中国岩溶,2010,29(3):239-245.
[9] 漆继红,许模,杨华云,等.川东铜锣山背斜-南温泉背斜温泉水力联系分析[J].人民长江,2011,42(11):5-9.
[10] 许模,王迪,漆继红.基于分形理论的喀斯特地貌形态分析[J].人民长江,2011,38(3):5-9.
[11] 曹嘉一弘.四川盆地盆周山地地下河发育分布规律统计分析[D].成都:成都理工大学,2013.
[12] 刘卫华,刘际国,杨家松,等.锦屏二级水电站辅助洞西端岩溶发育特征研究[C]//第三届全国岩土与工程学术大会论文集.2009:485-492.
[13] 王锡魁,王德.现代地貌学[Z].2009:126-127.
[14] 蒲俊兵,袁道先,蒋勇军.重庆市地下河的空间分布及水资源[J].水文地质工程地质,2009(2):34-39.
[15] 刘细元,马振兴,杨永革,等.宜春-新余一带岩溶基本特征及发育规律分析[J].华东理工学院学报,2006,29(2):127-132.
[16] 黄琨,武亚遵,万军伟.落马洞暗河发育特征及其洪涝成因分析[J].中国岩溶,2010,29(4):385-388.
[17] 尹辉,蒋忠诚,罗为群,等.西南岩溶区水土流失与石漠化动态评价研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(1):66-70.
[18] 孙晋玉,张强,许模,等.通海隧道施工涌突水灾害与环境影响研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(4):69-73.
[19] 刘建,刘丹.岩溶隧道建设引起的地下水环境负效应研究:以铜锣山隧道为例[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(3):268-271.
[20] 陈旭,许模,杜宇本等.保山隧道暗河管道系统及其对隧道影响研究[J].人民长江,2011,42(5):22-25.

相似文献/References:

[1]吴永红,郑祥民,周立旻.中国全新世气候变迁相位差与亚洲季风及西风带的联系[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(01):27.
　WU Yong-hong,ZHENG Xiang-min,ZHOU Li-min.The Asynchronous Nature of Holocene Climate Variability in China and Its Linkage to Asian Monsoon and the Westerly[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(02):27.
[2]约日古丽·卡斯木,瓦哈甫·哈力克,刘敬强.于田-且末绿洲空间扩张特征对比分析[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(06):105.
　LIU Jing-qiang.Comparative Analysis on Spacial Expansion Characteristics in Keriya-Qerchen Oasis[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(02):105.
[3]龙训建,王根绪,张春敏,等.高寒草甸典型小流域土壤水分空间变异对比研究[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(06):160.
　LONG Xun-jian,WANG Gen-xu,ZHANG Chun-min,et al.The Contrast Analysis on the Spatial Heterogeneity of Soil Moisture of Two Comparative Gully Catchments of Alpine Meadow[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(02):160.
[4]潘永刚.城市建设与规划的地学层面思考[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(03):125.
　PAN Yong-gang.Reflection of Urban Construction and Planning on Geosciences Level[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2003,10(02):125.
[5]刘畅,师学义,张美荣.黄土高原区复垦村庄土壤肥力评价——以山西省泽州县西郜村为例[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(01):155.
　LIU Chang,SHI Xueyi,ZHANG Meirong.Evaluation of Soil Fertility of Reclaimed Village in the Loess Plateau Area—A Case Study of Xigao Village, Zezhou County, Shanxi Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(02):155.
[6]璩路路,师学义,刘畅.基于能值的资源型城市新陈代谢过程对比分析[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(01):279.
　QU Lulu,SHI Xueyi,LIU Chang.Comparative Analysis of Resource-Oriented Urban Metabolisms Based on the Emergy Theory[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(02):279.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2013-10-14;改回日期:2013-10-28。
作者简介:范辰辰(1989-),女,四川成都人,硕士研究生,主要从事水文地质、环境地质等方面的研究工作。E-mail:kfcfcc@163.com
通讯作者:许模(1963-),男,重庆涪陵人,教授,博士生导师,主要从事地质工程、水文地质等方面的研究工作。E-mail:xm@cdut.edu.cn

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01