ZHANG He-quan.Species Diversity of Plant Community in the Origin Area of the Minjiang River， Southwestern China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(05):135-140.
岷江源区植物群落物种多样性分析
- Title:
- Species Diversity of Plant Community in the Origin Area of the Minjiang River， Southwestern China
- Keywords:
- origin area of the Minjiang river; plant community; species diversity; environmental factors; canonical correlation analysis
- 分类号:
- Q948.15
- 摘要:
- 取样调查了岷江源区植被及其环境因子，利用多元统计方法揭示了该区植物群落物种多样性及其与环境因子的关系。结果表明：不同植被类型的物种多样性表现为森林群系 > 灌丛群系 > 草甸群系。柳灌丛、窄叶鲜卑花灌丛、绣线菊灌丛、锦鸡儿灌丛的草本层多样性较高，沙棘灌丛和小果小檗灌丛较低。草甸群系中，白茅草甸和苔草草甸多样性较高，蒿草草甸和高山草甸的物种多样性较低。锦鸡儿灌丛灌木层多样性较高，沙棘灌丛的多样性最低。岷江源区植物群落物种组成受海拔梯度的影响强烈，不同海拔梯度的物种组成差异明显。植物群落在2 900～3 100，3 500～3 700 m海拔段有较高的物种多样性，2 700～2 900，3 100～3 400，3 700～3 900 m海拔段的多样性较低。土壤因子与地形因子之间，海拔和坡向对土壤养分因子的影响较大，主要影响全N、土壤含水量和pH值。地形因子和植被因子之间，海拔和坡向影响灌木层多样性、盖度以及草本层的盖度。植被因子和土壤因子之间，土壤全N量、速效K和土壤含水量影响草本层、灌木层的盖度和多样性。
- Abstract:
- Species diversity of plant community is one of the major components of ecosystem functions. It was influenced by many environmental factors, such as soil and topographic characteristics. Conversely, plant community diversity patterns also influence the soil characteristics. The upper reaches of the Minjiang River is located in the transition zone between the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and the Sichuan Basin. It has a typical arid valley climate with complex topography and variable water and heat conditions. Based on the field investigation of plant species and environmental factors (altitude, microtopography, soil water content, and soil nutrients) in the origin area of Minjiang River, Sichuan Province, southwestern China, plant community diversity and its relationship with environmental factors were studied. The diversity in different vegetation types varied as follows: forest formations>shrub formations>meadow formations. The diversity in herb layer of form Salix spp., form Sibiraea angustata, form Spiraea spp.and form Caragana spp.are at high level, while form Hippophae rhamnoides and form Berberis amurensis are at lower level. In meadow formations, the diversity of form Imperata cylindrica and form Carex spp.are higher than that of form Sub-alpine and form Kobresia spp. As for shrub layer, form Caragana spp. has the highest diversity, form Hippophae rhamnoides has the lowest diversity. Diversity in herb layer is higher than that of shrub layer. Under a great influence of altitude gradient, species compositions in plant communities in the origin area of Minjiang River show significant differences. With an increase of altitude, diversity of both the herb layer and shrub layer displays symmetrical changing trends that they are almost the same at altitude ranges of 2 700~3 300 m and 3 300~3 900 m. The higher diversity can be observed at altitude ranges of 2 900~3 100 m and 3 500~3 700 m, while a lower one can be observed at altitude ranges of 2 700~2 900 m, 3 100~3 400, 3 700~3 900 m. The maximum diversity of shrub layer and herb layer occurs at the altitudes of 3 000 m and 3 600 m, respectively. Canonical correlation analysis among vegetation, soil and topography factors shows that significant correlation exists between each pair of the variables. Altitude and slope aspect have great influences on total N, soil water content, soil pH, species diversity in the shrub layer, shrub and herb layer coverage, while species diversity and coverage of shrub and herb layer coverage is closely related to the total nitrogen, available K and soil water content.
参考文献/References:
[1] 陶冶,徐岩岩,刘彤,等.天山北部拟南芥生存群落物种多样性的空间格局[J].生态学杂志,2009,28(5):795-803.
[2] Whittaker R J, Willis K J, Field R. Scale and species richness:towards a general, hierarchical theory of species diversity[J]. Journal of Biogeography,2001,28:453-470.
[3] Willis K J,Whittaker R J. Species diversity-scale matters[J]. Science,2002,295(5558):1245-1248.
[4] 赵振勇,王让会,尹传华,等.天山南麓山前平原植物群落物种多样性及空间分异研究[J].西北植物学报,2007,27(4):784-790.
[5] 关文彬,曾德慧,姜凤岐.中国东北西部地区沙质荒漠化过程与植被动态关系的生态学研究:群落多样性与沙质荒漠化过程[J].生态学报,2000,20(1):93-98.
[6] 吴波,朱春全,李迪强,等.长江上游森林生态区生物多样性保护优先区确定:基于生态区保护方法[J].生物多样性,2006,14(2):87-97.
[7] 包维楷,王春明.岷江上游山地生态系统的退化机制[J].2000,18(1):57-62.
[8] 刘庆,乔永康,吴宁,等.岷江上游山地生态系统退化机理研究的核心:关键种群的作用[J].长江流域资源与环境,2002,11(3):274-278.
[9] 冶民生,关文彬,谭辉,等.岷江干旱河谷灌丛α多样性分析[J].生态学报,2004,24(6):1123-1130.
[10] 冶民生,吴斌,关文彬,等.岷江上游植物群落稳定性研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(1):259-263.
[11] 张贺全,孙饶斌,冶民生,等.岷江源区主要灌木种群生态位研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(1):125-129.
[12] 张金屯.数量生态学[M].北京:科学出版社,2004.
[13] 关文彬,吴建安,梁广林,等.岷江源区植被分类及其主要类型[M]//中国科学院生物多样性委员会.第五届全国生物多样性保护与持续利用研讨会论文集.北京:气象出版社,2004.
[14] 王国宏.再论生物多样性与生态系统的稳定性[J].生物多样性,2002,10(1):126-134.
[15] 郝占庆等,于德永,杨晓明,等.长白山北坡植物群落α多样性及其随海拔梯度的变化[J].2002,13(7):785-789.
[16] 尚文艳,吴钢,付晓,等.陆地植物群落物种多样性维持机制[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(3):573-578.
[17] 徐远杰,陈亚宁,李卫红,等.伊犁河谷山地植物群落物种多样性分布格局及环境解释[J].植物生态学报,2010,34(10):1142-1154.
[18] 谭勇,张强,潘伯荣,等.我国沙拐枣属(Calligonum L.)天然群落物种多样性与土壤因子的耦合关系[J].干旱区地理,2008,31(1):88-96.
[19] 聂莹莹,李新娥,王刚.阳坡一阴坡生境梯度上植物群落α多样性与β多样性的变化模式及与环境因子的关系[J].兰州大学学报:自然科学版,2010,46(3):74-79.
[20] 陈光升.四川小寨子沟森林群落物种多样性的环境梯度分析[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2010,18(2):182-188.
[21] 赵锐锋,周华荣,钱亦兵,等.塔里木河中下游湿地及周边植物群落与环境因子的关系初探[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(6):955-960.
[22] 周斌,杨红梅,胡顺军,等.河水漫溢对塔里木河下游土壤及植被的影响[J].干旱区地理,2010,33(3):442-448.
[23] 张佳,李生宇,靳正忠,等.防护林下草本植物层片物种多样性与环境因子的关系[J].干旱区研究,2011,28(1):118-125.
相似文献/References:
[1]郑佳丽,高国雄,王荣秀,等.北川河流域退耕还林还草地主要植物群落物种多样性研究[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(04):101.
ZHENG Jia-li,GAO Guo-xiong,WANG Rong-xiu,et al.Studies on Species Diversity of Plant Community of the Converting Farmland in Beichuanhe Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(05):101.
[2]栗妍,魏玮,邱扬,等.黄土丘陵小流域植被恢复驱动下的土壤养分特征[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(06):115.
LI Yan,WEI Wei,QIU Yang,et al.Effects of Different Vegetation Restoration Types on Soil Nutrient Properties in the Hill and Gully Region of Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(05):115.
[3]陈亚娟,周忠发,闫利会.喀斯特峡谷区石漠化演变中群落多样性的响应[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(05):205.
CHEN Yajuan,ZHOU Zhongfa,YAN Lihui.Response of Plant Community Diversity to Rocky Desertification Succession in Karst Valley Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(05):205.
[4]薛智德,杨光,梁一民,等.燕儿沟人工植被营造模式与快速建设研究[J].水土保持研究,2000,7(02):128.
XUE Zhide,YANG Guang,LIANG Yimin,et al.Study on Artificial Vegetation Modes Planted and Fast Construction of Yan’er Valley[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2000,7(05):128.
[5]夏江宝,许景伟,李传荣,等.胶南市海防林不同植被梯度带物种多样性分析[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(06):108.
XIA Jiang-bao,XU Jing-wei,LI Chuan-rong,et al.Analysis of Biodiversity of Different Plant Gradient in Coastal Protective Forest of Jiaonan City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(05):108.
[6]严慧玲,刘东明,陈红锋,等.河北邢汾高速边坡沿线植物群落物种组成与重要值分析[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(02):328.
YAN Huiling,LIU Dongming,CHEN Hongfeng,et al.Species Composition of Plant Community and Analysis of Important Value in the Roadside of Xingfen Highway of Hebei Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(05):328.
[7]欧芷阳,申文辉,彭玉华,等.广西平果县岩溶山地不同植物群落的土壤酶活性[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(03):75.
OU Zhiyang,SHEN Wenhui,PENG Yuhua,et al.Soil Enzyme Activities of Different Plant Communities in Karst Mountains of Pinguo County, Guangxi[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(05):75.
[8]胡淑萍,刘鹏举,高开通,等.北京九龙山自然保护区植物群落物种多样性分析[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(04):125.
HU Shu-ping,LIU Peng-ju,GAO Kai-tong,et al.Analysis of Species Diversities of Plant Communities in Jiulongshan Nature Reserve, Beijing[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(05):125.
[9]寇萌,焦菊英.黄土丘陵沟壑区抵抗土壤侵蚀的植物群落结构特征[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(06):7.
KOU Meng,JIAO Juying.Structure of Erosion-Resistant Plant Community in the Hill-Gully Region of the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(05):7.
[10]吴世祥,何聪,杨丹,等.2009-2018年谢家店震后滑坡体植被恢复研究[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(06):235.
WU Shixiang,HE Cong,YANG Dan,et al.Study of Vegetation Restoration After the Earthquake on Xiejiadian Landslide in the Period 2009-2018[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(05):235.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2013-03-04;改回日期:2013-05-10。
基金项目:国家重点基础研究发展规划项目（G2000046807）
作者简介:张贺全(1965-),男,河北唐山人,副研究员,主要从事生态环境保护方面的研究。E-mail:qecczhq@126.com