LI Xiao-kun,WANG Shu-wei.Assessment of the County’s Rurality in the Eco-economic Zone of the Three-Gorge Reservoir Area in Chongqing[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(01):168-172.
重庆三峡库区生态经济区县域乡村性评价
- Title:
- Assessment of the County’s Rurality in the Eco-economic Zone of the Three-Gorge Reservoir Area in Chongqing
- 关键词:
- 农村经济学; 县域; 乡村发展类型; 乡村性指数; 重庆三峡库区生态经济区
- Keywords:
- rural economics; county; rural development type; rurality index; the eco-economic zone of the Three-Gorge Reservoir area in Chongqing
- 分类号:
- F127
- 摘要:
- 重庆三峡库区生态经济区乡村人口多、贫困人口多、贫困范围广，认识评价其乡村性，明确乡村发展方向，对于推进重庆市城乡统筹发展、新农村建设都具有现实意义。根据2010年重庆统计年鉴数据，选择各产业地区生产总值相对比重指标将重庆三峡库区生态经济区的县域划分为第一产业主导型、工矿业主导型、商旅服务型和均衡型4种乡村发展类型。基于此，选取城镇化率、农业劳动生产率、农地产出率、农业产值与非农业产值比、高速公路密度、广播电视覆盖率等指标评价判断各县域的乡村性。结果表明：同类及不同类乡村发展类型的县域之间的乡村发展水平差异明显，工矿业主导型乡村发展类型中乡村性弱的仅有3个区，乡村性显著的有两个区县；均衡型乡村发展类型中乡村性居中的县域有4个，乡村性强和显著的也有4个县；第一产业主导型和商旅服务型乡村发展类型的县域乡村性强或显著。最后，明确了各乡村发展类型的县域经济发展方向。
- Abstract:
- The eco-economic zone of the Three-Gorge Reservoir area in Chongqing is characterized as a large number of rural populations, high proportions of poor people, and a wide range of poverty-stricken areas. Assessment of the rurality and determination of the development direction are helpful for the promotion of the balancing urban-rural development and new countryside constructions. The data were collected from Chongqing Statistical Yearbook of 2010. The relative proportion of the three industries in the GDP was used to categorize this eco-economic zone into four rural development types which were agricultural-dominated, industrial and mineral-dominated, balanced and business, tourism and service-oriented. On this basis, the rurality of each country was assessed by the indicators of urbanization, agricultural labor productivity, agricultural output growth, the ratio of agricultural output to non-agricultural, highway density, radio and television coverage. It indicated that significant differences exist between similar and different rural development types. There were only three districts which had weak rurality and two counties with significant rurality in the mining and industrial-oriented countries; and there were four counties with middle rurality, and another four counties with significant rurality in the balanced counties. However, all the agriculture-dominated, business, tourism and service-oriented counties were significant. In addition, the development direction for each county of various rural development types were proposed.
参考文献/References:
[1] Cloke P, Goodwin M, Milbourne P, et al. Deprivation, poverty and marginalization in rural lifestyles in England and Wales[J]. Journal of Rural Studies,1995,11(2):351-365.
[2] 李小建,周雄飞,郑纯辉.河南农区经济发展差异地理影响的小尺度分析[J].地理学报,2008,63(2):147-155.
[3] Woods M. Rural Geography:Processes, Responses and Experiences in Rural Restructuring[M]. London:Sage,2005.
[4] Halfacree K. Locality and social representation:space, discourse and alternative definitions of the rural[J]. Journal of Rural Studies,1993,9(3):23-37.
[5] 吴国庆,杨良山,金敏毓,等.浙江省生态环境区域类型划分及不同区域生态环境[J].中国农业资源与区划,2000,21(5):30-34.
[6] 重庆市统计局.重庆统计年鉴2010[Z].北京:中国统计出版社,2010.
[7] 龙花楼,刘彦随,邹健.中国东部沿海地区乡村发展类型及其乡村性评价[J].地理学报,2009,64(4):426-434.
[8] 叶长盛,黄建军.江西省县域农村居民纯收入空间差异研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(3):153-157.
[9] 曹连海,郝仕龙,陈南祥.农村生态环境指标体系的构建与评价[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(5):238-244.
[10] 刘慧.我国农村发展地域差异及类型划分[J].地理学与国土研究,2002,18(4):71-75.
[11] 牛传军,张超,王秀茹.休闲农业-旅游新看点[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(2):264-265.
[12] 王闰平,陈凯.中国退耕还林还草现状及问题分析[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(5):188-192.
[13] 邓广山,苏维词,赵国军.重庆农村经济社会发展水平评价[J].重庆师范大学学报:自然科学版,2011,28(2):28-34.
相似文献/References:
[1]朱传民,黄雅丹,吴佳,等.江西省县域耕地集约利用水平时空差异研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(02):160.
ZHU Chuan-min,HUANG Ya-dan,WU Jia,et al.Study on Spatio-temporal Difference in Intensive Use of Cultivated Land at the County Scale in Jiangxi Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(01):160.
[2]赵璐,郑新奇.基于GIS和分等成果的县域内农用地定级方法研究——以山东省平阴县为例[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(04):145.
ZHAO Lu,ZHENG Xin-qi.A Study on Agricultural Land Grading of County Based on GIS and Classification Production—Taking Pingyin County of Shandong Province as a Case Study[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(01):145.
[3]操信春,吴普特,郝仕龙,等.西北内陆县域气候变化及其对河川径流的影响[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(05):26.
CAO Xin-chun,WU Pu-te,HAO Shi-long,et al.Impacts of Climate Change on the River Runoff in Intra-county of Northwest Interior Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(01):26.
[4]韩蕾,孔祥斌,郭洪峰,等.西南山区生态敏感区土地生态安全评价——以秀山县为例[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(01):229.
HAN Lei,KONG Xiangbin,GUO Hongfeng,et al.Study on Land Eco-security Evaluation of Ecological Sensitive Area in Southwest Mountains -A Case Study in Xiushan County[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(01):229.
[5]仲俊涛,米文宝,吴昕燕,等.宁夏限制开发区县域生态经济位比较研究[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(02):234.
ZHONG Jun-tao,MI Wen-bao,WU Xin-yan,et al.Comparative Research on County Eco-ecological Niche of Restricted Zone in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(01):234.
[6]刘小波,彭春艳,魏丽,等.重庆市荣昌县集体建设用地流转驱动力分析[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(03):182.
LIU Xiao-bo,PENG Chun-yan,WEI Li,et al.Analysis of Driving Force on Circulating Rural Collective Land in Rongchang County, Chongqing City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(01):182.
[7]马如彪,刘云,王金亮,等.云南藏区县域农业生态系统能值分析[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(04):92.
MA Ru-biao,LIU Yun,WANG Jin-liang,et al.Analysis of Agricultural Ecological Energy at County Level in Tibetan Areas of Yunnan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(01):92.
[8]余玉敏,陈万旭,朱丽君,等.河南省农业生产效率测度及影响因素[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(05):262.
YU Yumin,CHEN Wanxu,ZHU Lijun,et al.Study on the Measurement and Influencing Factors of Agricultural Production Efficiency in Henan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(01):262.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2012-06-21;改回日期:2012-07-12。
基金项目:教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目（11YJAZH049）；国家自然科学基金项目（41101563，41201133）；资源环境与生态建设重庆市创新团队项目（2010年）；重庆市地理学重点学科项目（2011年）
作者简介:李孝坤(1962-),男,四川西充县人,教授,硕士生导师,主要研究方向:资源环境与区域发展。E-mail:cslixk@qq.com