[1]王安,郝明德,臧逸飞,等.秸秆覆盖和留茬的田间水土保持效应[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(01):47-51.
　WANG An,HAO Ming-de,ZANG Yi-fei,et al.Effects of Straw Mulching and Stubble on Soil and Water Conservation with Corns Planted[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(01):47-51.
点击复制

秸秆覆盖和留茬的田间水土保持效应

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 20 期数: 2013年01期 页码: 47-51 栏目: 出版日期: 2013-02-28
Title:
Effects of Straw Mulching and Stubble on Soil and Water Conservation with Corns Planted
作者:
王安1, 郝明德1,2, 臧逸飞1, 鲍艳杰3
1. 西北农林科技大学 资源环境学院, 陕西 杨凌 712100;
2. 西北农林科技大学 水土保持研究所, 陕西 杨凌 712100;
3. 西北农林科技大学 农学院, 陕西 杨凌 712100
Author(s):
WANG An1, HAO Ming-de1,2, ZANG Yi-fei1, BAO Yan-jie3
1. College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China;
2. Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China;
3. College of Agronomy, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China
关键词:
人工降雨; 水土保持; 覆盖; 留茬
Keywords:
simulation rainfall; soil and water conservation; straw mulch; stubble
分类号:
S157.2
摘要:
通过人工模拟降雨试验，研究秸秆覆盖和留茬在玉米生育期的水土保持效应。结果表明：覆盖和留茬在玉米不同生育期均可有效减少土壤侵蚀，覆盖的效果更为明显，其产沙量最大可减少75%，留茬的产沙量最大可减少29%。相同秸秆用量下实行覆盖的水土保持效应较留茬明显。覆盖结合留茬减弱土壤侵蚀的效果明显，在玉米各生育期的产沙量均有大幅减少，低覆盖高留茬减幅最大为85%，高覆盖低留茬减幅最大为78%；在抽穗期对径流强度也有削弱，低覆盖高留茬的径流量减少23%，高覆盖低留茬减少15%，相同秸秆用量下低覆盖高留茬对水土流失的抑制较高覆盖低留茬明显。
Abstract:
Experiments under simulation rainfall were conducted to study effects of straw mulch and stubble on soil and water conservation at different growth stages of corn. Results showed that both straw mulch which had much more obvious effects, and stubble would efficiently delay the runoff initiating time and reduce the amount of soil erosion. The effect of straw mulch was most distinct at the jointing stage with the runoff initiating time delayed by 96% compared with CK, the amount of soil erosion reduced by 75%, at the seeding stage and the amount of cumulative runoff was reduced by 15% at the heading stage at the same time. These measures of straw mulch combining with stubble also delayed the runoff initiating time and reduced the amount of soil erosion efficiently at the different growth stages of corn, especially at the jointing stage. The runoff initiating time was delayed by 1.36 times under low straw mulch combining with high stubble, and by 52% under high straw mulch combining with low stubble, meanwhile, the amount of soil erosion was reduced by 85% and 78%, respectively compared with CK at the jointing stage of corn. And at the heading stage, the cumulative amount of runoff was reduced by 23% and 15%, respectively under low straw mulch combining with high stubble and high straw mulch combining with low stubble, both of which demonstrated distinct effects on soil and water conservation, especially low straw mulch combining with high stubble.

参考文献/References:

[1] 殷水清,谢云.黄土高原降雨侵蚀力时空分布[J].水土保持通报,2005,25(4):29-33.
[2] 师江澜,刘建忠,吴发启.保护性耕作研究进展与评述[J].干旱地区农业研究,2006,24(1):205-212.
[3] 高旺盛.论保护性耕作技术的基本原理与发展趋势[J].中国农业科学,2007,40(12):2702-2708.
[4] Smith J L. The significance of soil microbial biomass estimation[J]. Soil Biochemistry,1990(6):357-384.
[5] 卢庭启,何丹,王秀全,等.我国保护性耕作的应用现状、问题及对策[J].耕作与栽培,2011(2):8-9.
[6] Vance E D, Brooks P C, Jenkinson D S. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass[J]. Soil Biol. Biolchem.,1987,19(6):703-707.
[7] 冯君,李万辉,耿玉辉,等.作物根茬留田的保土培肥效应[J].土壤通报,2006,37(5):890-893.
[8] 宋玥,张忠学.不同耕作措施对黑土坡耕地土壤侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(2):14-16,25.
[9] 金轲,蔡典雄,吕军杰,等.耕作对坡耕地水土流失和冬小麦产量的影响[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(4):1-5,49.
[10] 唐涛,郝明德,单凤霞.人工降雨条件下秸秆覆盖减少水土流失的效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(1):9-11,40.
[11] 臧英,高焕文,周建忠.保护性耕作对农田土壤风蚀影响的试验研究[J].农业工程学报,2003,19(2):56-60.
[12] 袁建平,蒋定生,甘淑.影响坡地降雨产流历时的因子分析[J].山地学报,1999,17(3):259-264.
[13] 鲁向晖,隋艳艳,王飞,等.保护性耕作技术对农田环境的影响研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2007,25(3):66-72.
[14] 谢瑞芝,李少昆,李小君,等.中国保护性耕作研究分析:保护性耕作与作物生产[J].中国农业科学,2007,40(9):1914-1924.
[15] Wicks G A, Crutchfield D A, Burnside O C. Influence of wheat (Triticum aeativum) straw mulch and metolachlor on corn (Zea mays) growth and yield[J]. Weed Sci.,1994,42(1):141-147.
[16] 郑和祥,郭克贞,郝万龙.作物生长指标与土壤水分状况及地温关系研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(3):210-212,216.
[17] 黄毅,邹洪涛,虞娜,等.东北半干旱区秋后玉米地不同处理方式对土壤水分状况的影响[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(2):34-36.

相似文献/References:

[1]王星,李占斌,李鹏.陕西省丹汉江流域水土保持工程投资情况分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):43.
　WANG Xing,LI Zhan-bin,LI Peng.Analysis of Soil and Water Conservation Project Investment Status of Dan-Han River Watershed in Shaanxi Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(01):43.
[2]宋凤军,穆兴民,白桦.嘉陵江流域输沙量演变规律分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):65.
　SONG Feng-jun,MU Xing-min,BAI Hua.Variation of Sediment Discharge in the Jialingjiang River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(01):65.
[3]高照良,吴晹,郭亚军.新疆维吾尔自治区水土保持补偿费收费方法和标准[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):275.
　GAO Zhao-liang,WU Yi,GUO Ya-jun.Soil and Water Conservation Methods and Standards of Compensation Charge in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(01):275.
[4]熊康宁,王恒松,刘云.毕节石桥小流域水土保持综合治理生态监测与效益评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):10.
　XIONG Kang-ning,WANG Heng-song,LIU Yun.Ecological Monitoring and the Evaluation on the Benefits of Comprehensive Management for Soil and Water Conservation in Shiqiao Watershed of Bijie City, Guizhou Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(01):10.
[5]朱青,陈正刚,李剑,等.贵州坡耕地三种种植模式的水土保持效果对比研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):21.
　ZHU Qing,CHEN Zheng-gang,LI Jian,et al.Comparative Study on Soil and Water Conservation Effect of the Three Cropping Patterns on Slope Land in Guizhou Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(01):21.
[6]贺振伟,郭东罡,白中科,等.两种水土生态恢复模式下刺槐种群数量特征与空间格局研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):48.
　HE Zhen-wei,GUO Dong-gang,BAI Zhong-ke,et al.Numeric Character and Spatial Pattern of Robinia pseudoacacia L. Population at Two Kinds of Recovery Modes[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(01):48.
[7]吴启蒙,朱志玲,吴咏梅,等.宁夏水土保持的产业结构影响评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):116.
　WU Qi-meng,ZHU Zhi-ling,WU Yong-mei,et al.Impact Evaluation on Industrial Structure of Soil and Water Conservation in Ningxia Hui Automonous Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(01):116.
[8]康万利,揭雨成,邢虎成.南方坡耕地种植苎麻水土保持效果和经济效益研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(03):86.
　KANG Wan-li,JIE Yu-cheng,XING Hu-cheng.Study of Soil-Water Conservation Effects and Economic Benefit of Ramie in South Slope Crop Land[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(01):86.
[9]汤崇军,郑海金,谢颂华.不同土壤抗蚀性指标对侵蚀泥沙影响的灰色关联度分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(02):1.
　TANG Chong-jun,ZHENG Hai-jin,XIE Song-hua.Effects of Different Anti-erodibility Parameters on Soil Erosion Based on Grey Correlation Degree Analysis[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(01):1.
[10]张霞,刘晓清,王亚萍,等.秦岭生态功能区水土保持治理效益评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(02):86.
　ZHANG Xia,LIU Xiao-qing,WANG Ya-ping,et al.Evaluation on Benefits of Soil and Water Conversation in Ecological Function Region of Qinling Mountain[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(01):86.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2012-07-10;改回日期:2012-08-10。
基金项目:国家科技支撑计划重大项目“农田水土保持关键技术研究与示范”（2011BAD31B01）；国家重点基础研究发展计划“主要粮食作物高产栽培与资源高效利用的基础研究”（2009CB118604）；农技推广与体系建设专项经费项目
作者简介:王安(1987-),男,陕西府谷人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向:保护性耕作的水土保持效应。E-mail:nevermindan@126.com
通讯作者:郝明德(1957-),男,陕西华县人,研究员,博士生导师,主要研究方向:农田生态系统生产力。E-mail:mdhao@ms.iswc.ac.cn

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01