LIU Tao,GAO Xiao-fei.Comparison of Determination on Grain Size of Cinnamon Soil by Laser Diffraction Particle Size Analyzer and Pipette Method[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(01):16-18,22.
激光粒度仪与沉降—吸管法测定褐土颗粒组成的比较
- Title:
- Comparison of Determination on Grain Size of Cinnamon Soil by Laser Diffraction Particle Size Analyzer and Pipette Method
- Keywords:
- soil particle-size analysis; pipette method; laser diffraction particle size analyzer; transformational model
- 分类号:
- S152.3+2;151.9+2
- 摘要:
- 土壤颗粒组成是土壤的基本物理属性之一，沉降—吸管法是传统土壤颗粒分析的主要方法，激光粒度仪法是近年来新兴的粒度分析方法。为了研究二者的差异，选取了23个黏粒含量差异较大的褐土样品，采用上述两种方法对土样进行了分析。结果表明：激光粒度仪检测＜0.002 mm颗粒含量低于吸管法，但二者有较好的相关性，决定系数为0.97；在检测＜0.02 mm颗粒含量时两者比较接近，并且相关性很好，决定系数为0.99；检测＜0.05 mm颗粒含量时两者也比较接近，决定系数为0.91。激光粒度仪检测结果通过转换模型修正后，可以较好地反映褐土土壤颗粒组成情况。
- Abstract:
- The particle-size composition is a basic soil physical property. Pipette method is a main traditional approch to analyze the soil particle-size composition while laser diffraction particle size analyzer is a new particle-size analysis instrument in recent years. The paper took 23 cinnamon soil samples with various clay particle contents to study the discrepancy between the two methods mentioned above. It shows that the results from laser diffraction particle size analyzer method are lower than pipette method when measuring the particle-size <0.002 mm while they have a good correlation with a determination coefficient of 0.97; when it comes to<0.02 mm particle-size, the results come close and have a strong correlation with a determination coefficient of 0.99; when measuring particle content<0.05 mm, they come very close with a determination coefficient of 0.91. The results from laser diffraction particle size analyzer can reflect the soil particle-size composition well if they get revised by a transformational model.
参考文献/References:
[1] 中国科学院南京土壤研究所土壤物理研究室.土壤物理性质测定法[M].北京:科学出版社, 1978:28-42.
[2] Dane J H, Topp G C. Methods of Soil Analysis: physical Methods[M]. Madison W I: Soil Science Society of America, 2002.
[3] Eshel G, Levy G J, Mingelgrin U, et a1. Critical evaluation of the use of laser diffraction for particle-size distribution analysis[J]. Soil Science Society of American Journal, 2004, 68:736-743.
[4] Konert M, Vandenberghe J. Comparison of laser grain-size analysis with pipette and sieve analysis: a solution for the underestimation of the clay fraction[J]. Sedimentology, 1997, 44:523-535.
[5] Beuselinck L, Govers G, Poesen J, et a1. Grain-size analysis by laser diffraetometry: comparison with the sieve-pipette method[J]. Catena, 1998, 32:193-208.
[6] 杨金玲, 张甘霖, 李德成, 等.激光法与湿筛—吸管法测定土壤颗粒组成的转换及质地确定[J].土壤学报, 2009, 46 (5):772-780.
[7] 刘雪梅, 黄元仿.应用激光粒度仪分析土壤机械组成的实验研究[J].土壤通报, 2005, 36 (4):579-582.
[8] 徐树建, 杜忠花.激光粒度仪测量风成堆积物粒度的实验研究[J].水土保持研究, 2007, 14 (2):209-212.
[9] 雷国良, 张虎才, 张文翔, 等.Mastersize2000型激光粒度仪分析数据可靠性检验及意义:以洛川剖面S4层古土壤为例[J].沉积学报, 2006, 24 (4):531-539.
[10] 庞奖励, 黄春长, 贾耀峰.不同方法测定黄土和古土壤样品粒度的比较[J].陕西师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2003, 31 (4):87-92.
相似文献/References:
[1]刘广通,海春兴,李占宏.应用吸管法进行风沙土机械组成分析的实验研究[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(02):121.
LIU Guang-tong,HAI Chun-xing,LI Zhan-hong.The Study of Analyzing the Mechanical of Aeolian Sandy Soil Using Straw Based on Experiment[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(01):121.
[2]朱瑜,张卓栋,刘畅,等.激光粒度仪与吸管法测定土壤机械组成的比较研究——以不同退化程度栗钙土为例[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(03):62.
ZHU Yu,ZHANG Zhuodong,LIU Chang,et al.Comparison of Laser Diffraction Method and Pipette Method on Soil Particle Size Distribution Determination—A Case Study of Variously Degraded Kastanozem[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(01):62.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2011-7-6;改回日期:2011-8-18。
基金项目:北京师范大学地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室开放课题（2008-ZY-01）
作者简介:刘涛（1989- ），男，重庆人，在读研究生，主要从事资源环境与城乡规划管理研究。E-mail：maxlrs@sina.com