[1]刘艳,刘学全,崔鸿侠,等.低丘黄壤区不同植被恢复模式水土保持功能分析[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(06):48-52.
　LIU Yan,LIU Xue-quan,CUI Hong-xia,et al.Analysis on Function of Water and Soil Conservation of Different Vegetation Restoration Patterns in Yellow Soil Area of Low Hill[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(06):48-52.
点击复制

低丘黄壤区不同植被恢复模式水土保持功能分析

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 17 期数: 2010年06期 页码: 48-52 栏目: 出版日期: 2010-12-20
Title:
Analysis on Function of Water and Soil Conservation of Different Vegetation Restoration Patterns in Yellow Soil Area of Low Hill
作者:
刘艳1,2,3, 刘学全2, 崔鸿侠2, 周金星3, 何丙辉1
1. 湖北省林业科学研究院, 武汉 430075;
2. 中国林业科学研究院, 北京 100091;
3. 西南大学 资源环境学院, 重庆 400716
Author(s):
LIU Yan1,2,3, LIU Xue-quan2, CUI Hong-xia2, ZHOU Jin-xing3, HE Bing-hui1
1. Hubei Academy of Forestry, Wuhan 430075, China;
2. Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China;
3. Institute of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400716, China
关键词:
低丘黄壤区; 植被恢复模式; 水土保持功能; 野外径流场观测
Keywords:
yellow soil area of low hill; vegetation restoration pattern; soil and water conservation function; observation of the field plot
分类号:
S157;X171.4
摘要:
在湖北省象鼻嘴小流域内，选取马尾松天然林及4种5年生的人工经济林+同等配置地埂植物篱模式，设置退耕5a的撂荒地作为对照，进行典型样地植被、土壤调查，结合各植被恢复模式的野外径流场地表水土流失观测数据进行分析。结果显示：植被群落特征、土壤理化性质等方面的明显优势决定了马尾松天然林模式的蓄水、保土功能最强，与撂荒地（对照）模式相比，它的地表径流削减率约为40%，土壤侵蚀削减率高达80%以上；人工植被恢复模式的蓄水、保土能力大小为：板栗+黄花菜>桃+黄花菜>竹+黄花菜>李+黄花菜，均超过撂荒地（对照）模式；板栗+黄花菜模式的地表径流削减率为30%左右，土壤侵蚀削减率约为67%，以其为代表的经济林+植物篱模式的水土保持功能比起天然林模式还有一定差距。
Abstract:
The masson pine natural forest and four 5-year artificial patterns that economic forest + equally configured ridge hedgerows were selected in Xiangbizui small watershed of Hubei province and the abandoned land that de-farming in five years was set as a control to carry through the vegetation and soil survey, and analyze the field plot observation data on surface soil erosion of each vegetation restoration pattern. The soil and water conservation function of masson pine pattern is significant due to the obvious advantages on community characteristics of vegetation, soil physical and chemical properties and other aspects. Compared with the abandoned land (control) mode, reduction rate of surface runoff is about 40% and reduction rate of soil erosion is high to 80% in plantation of masson pine. The capacity that water storage and soil conservation of the artificial vegetation restoration patterns followed the order of chestnut +daylily>peach+daylily>bamboo +daylily>plum+daylily. They all exceeded the abandoned land (control) mode. The reduction rate of surface runoff of chestnut+daylily mode is about 30% and reduction rate of soil erosion is about 67%. The soil and water conservation function of economic forest+ridge hedgerows modes such as chestnut +daylily representative had a gap compared with that of natural forest modes.

参考文献/References:

[1] 袁爱萍.美国人工降雨模拟设备的引进与应用[J].北京水利,2004(6):36-37.
[2] 郑粉莉,唐克丽,白红英.标准小区和大型坡面径流场径流泥沙监测方法分析[J].人民黄河,1994(7):19-22.
[3] 路炳军,袁爱萍,张超.坡地径流场监测数据质量控制[J].北京水务,2009,2(增刊):55-57.
[4] 张玉洪,张克映,马友金,等.西双版纳热带森林地表径流场设计的研究[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1999,5(6):56-60.
[5] 中华人民共和国水利部.水土保持监测设施通用技术条件(SL342-2006)[S].2006.
[6] 何丙辉,赵晓莅,齐代华.生态恢复过程中水土保持林乔木层多样性研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2008,28(4):113-117.
[7] 高贤明,马克平,陈灵芝.暖温带若干落叶阔叶林群落物种多样性及其与群落动态的关系[J].植物生态学报,2001,25(3):283-290.

相似文献/References:

[1]李品荣,孟广涛,方向京,等.滇中不同植被恢复模式下土壤肥力变化趋势研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):90.
　LI Pin-rong,MENG Guang-tao,FANG Xiang-jing,et al.Study on Change Trends of Soil Fertility under Different Vegetation Recovery Modes in Central Yunnan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(06):90.
[2]赵名彦,丁国栋,罗俊宝,等.沙地公路取土场植被恢复模式与效果分析[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(01):191.
　ZHAO Ming-yan,DING Guo-dong,LUO Jun-bao,et al.A Mode of Vegetation Restoration and Its Benefits Analysis in Sand Cutting Sites of Highway[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(06):191.
[3]郭文,王天伟,高照良.黄土区高速公路植被恢复模式与群落结构分析[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(04):176.
　GUO Wen,WANG Tian-wei,GAO Zhao-liang.Vegetative Restoration Pattern and Analysis of Community Structure along the Sides of Expressway on the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(06):176.
[4]熊诗源,许文年,夏栋,等.不同植被恢复模式对植被混凝土基材微生物特征的影响研究[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(04):279.
　XIONG Shi-yuan,XU Wen-nian,XIA Dong,et al.Effects of Soil Microbial Features on Vegetation-growing Concrete Gunning in Different Vegetative Restoration Patterns[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(06):279.
[5]苗保河,郑延海,伏芳,等.北京市门头沟区石灰窑遗址及公路边坡裸露地表植被修复模式的生态评价[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(06):125.
　MIAO Bao-he,ZHENG Yan-hai,FU Fang,et al.Ecological Evaluation on Vegetation Restoration in Bare Lands of Limekiln Site and Road Slope in Mentougou District of Beijing[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(06):125.
[6]赵洋毅,段旭.滇东石漠化地区不同植被模式土壤渗透性研究[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(04):45.
　ZHAO Yang-yi,DU Xu.Study on Soil Infiltration Capability under Different Vegetation Models in Rocky-Desertification Areas of Karst in Eastern Part of Yunnan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(06):45.
[7]白永会,查 轩,吴伟成,等.植被恢复花岗岩红壤土壤颗粒组成及土壤养分储量特征[J].水土保持研究,2024,31(03):179.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.03.046]
　Bai Yonghui,Zha Xuan,Wu Weicheng,et al.Characteristics of Soil Particle Composition and Soil Nutrient Storage in Vegetated Granite Red Soil[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(06):179.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.03.046]

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2010-5-21
基金项目:“十一五”国家科技支撑计划项目（2006BAD-03A16-03）
作者简介:刘艳（1984- ），女，云南楚雄人，硕士研究生，主要研究方向为水土保持生态修复。E-mail：liuyan1984213@163.com
通讯作者:刘学全（1966- ），男，湖北黄梅人，研究员，主要从事森林生态研究。E-mail：liuxq027@126.com

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01