[1]杨平,王海燕,张洪江.水土保持林及其配置模式对土壤养分的影响[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(03):196-201.
　YANG Ping,WANG Hai-yan,ZHANG Hong-jiang.Effect of Different Forests for Soil and Water Conservation & Their Configuration Patterns on Soil Nutrients[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(03):196-201.
点击复制

水土保持林及其配置模式对土壤养分的影响

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 16 期数: 2009年03期 页码: 196-201 栏目: 出版日期: 2009-06-20
Title:
Effect of Different Forests for Soil and Water Conservation & Their Configuration Patterns on Soil Nutrients
作者:
杨平1,2, 王海燕1,2, 张洪江1,2
1. 北京林业大学 水土保持学院 北京 100083;
2. 北京林业大学 水土保持与荒漠化防治教育部重点实验室 北京 100083
Author(s):
YANG Ping1,2, WANG Hai-yan1,2, ZHANG Hong-jiang1,2
1. College of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Desertification Combating of Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
关键词:
重庆四面山; 水土保持林; 配置模式; 土壤养分
Keywords:
Simian Mountain of Chongqing; forest for soil and water conservation; configuration patterns; soil nutrients
分类号:
S157;S714.7
摘要:
为了认识不同水土保持林及其配置模式对土壤养分的保护效应，以重庆四面山低山丘陵区水土保持林为研究对象，研究了不同水土保持林不同时期的土壤养分含量。该文对土壤养分含量先后进行了描述性统计分析、相关性分析和主成分分析，最后利用主成分分析提起的两个养分综合指标进行方差分析。结果表明：空旷地、人工林及天然林土壤养分含量差异显著，其中天然林土壤养分含量最高，其次是人工林。天然林和人工林土壤有机质、全N、有效P和速效K含量分别为：82.61 g/kg、2.81 g/kg、8.86 mg/kg、120.91 mg/kg和59.80 g/kg、2.14 g/kg、8.43 mg/kg、98.81 mg/kg。与空旷地土壤养分含量相比，分别同比增加了231.08%，212.06%，11.77%，84.39%和139.67%，138.12%，6.32%，50.69%。10 a生与5 a生人工林土壤第一主成分养分含量差异显著，其中前者第一主成分养分含量比后者增加了127.59%。它们的土壤有机质、全N、有效P及速效K平均含量与空旷地相比，分别同比增加了202.47%，265.01%，10.06%，76.22%和125.12%，75.39%，3.46%，42.14%。10 a生人工林对土壤养分的保护结果达到了天然次生林的水平。在本研究中，不同配置模式的水土保持林，对土壤养分影响差异不显著。
Abstract:
In order to understand the protection effect of different forests for soil and water conservation and their configuration patterns on soil nutrients, soil nutrients of these forests in the district of low mountains and hills in Simian Mountain of Chongqing were studied in different periods by applying descriptive statistical analysis, correlation analysis, principal component analysis and analysis of variance. The results showed that: ①There were significant differences of soil nutrients among bare land, plantations and natural forests, with the order of natural forests > plantations for soil and water conservation > bare land. In natural forest and plantation sample plots, the organic matter content, total N, available P and readily available K concentration was 82.61 g/kg,2.81 g/kg,8.86 mg/kg,120.91 mg/kg,59.80 g/kg,2.14 g/kg,8.43 mg/kg,98.81 mg/kg respectively, which increased by 231.08%, 212.06%, 11.77%, 84.39% and 139.67%, 138.12%, 6.32%, 50.69% accordingly when compared with those in bare land. ② A significant effect of forest age on soil nutrients was found. Compared with 5-year-old plantations, the nutrients concentrations in the first principal component in the 10-year-old plantations increased 127.59%. When compared with the bare land, the organic matter content, total N, available P and readily available K concentration in the 10-year-old plantations and 5-year-old plantations increased 202.47%, 265.01%, 10.06%, 76.22% and 125.12%, 75.39%, 3.46%, 42.14% respectively.③The 10-year-old plantations were the rival of the natural forests for soil nutrients protection. However, there were no significant differences between different configuration patterns of forests for soil and water conservation on soil nutrients.

参考文献/References:

[1] 柯克比M J, 摩根R P C.土壤侵蚀[M].王礼先, 译.北京:水利水电出版社, 1987.
[2] Grey M, Henry C. Phosphorus and nitrogen runoff from a forested watershed fertilized with boisolids[J]. J.Environ.Qual., 2002, 31:926-936.
[3] 朱兆良, 孙波, 杨林章, 等.我国农业面源污染的控制政策和措施[J].科学导报, 2005, 23(4):47-51.
[4] 李俊波, 华珞, 冯琰.坡地土壤养分流失研究概况[J].土壤通报, 2005, 36(5):753-759.
[5] 李其林, 魏朝富, 王显军, 等.农业面源污染发生的条件与污染机理[J].土壤通报, 2008, 29(1):168-175.
[6] Loch R J. Effects of vegetation cover on runoff and erosion under simulation rain and overland flow on a rehabilitated site on the Meandu Mine, Tarong, Queenland[J].Aust. J. Soil Res., 2000, 38:299-312.
[7] Gilly J E, Risse L M. Runoff and soil loss as affected by the application of manure[J].Transaction of the ASAE, 2000, 43(6):1583-1588.
[8] Foley J L, Silburn D M. Hydraulic properties of rain impact surface seals on three clay soil-influence of raindrop impact frequency and rainfall intensity during steady state[J].Aust.J.Soil Res., 2002, 40:1069-1083.
[9] Andrea R, Enrico B, GiAnluca B. Nonpoint source transport models from empiricism to coherent theoretical frameworks[J] Ecological Modelling, 2005, 184:19-35.
[10] 李恒鹏, 金洋, 李燕.模拟降雨条件下农田地表径流与壤中流氮磷流失比较[J].水土保持学报, 2008, 22(2):6-9.
[11] 林超文, 庞良玉, 陈一兵, 等.四川盆地紫色土N, P损失载体及影响因子[J].水土保持学报, 2008, 22(2):20-23.
[12] 苏子友, 吴文良, 张劲松, 等.小浪底库区坡地不同利用方式下土壤养分的流失特征研究[J].水土保持通报, 2007, 27(3)27-31.
[13] 饶良懿.三峡库区理水调洪型防护林空间配置与结构优化技术研究[D].北京:北京林业大学, 2003.
[14] 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析(3版)[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 2000.
[15] 于秀林, 任雪松.多元统计分析[M].北京:中国统计出版社, 1999.

相似文献/References:

[1]李兰花,孙树光,朱金兆,等.北京市低山区水土保持林评价与分级[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):134.
　LI Lan-hua,SUN Shu-guang,ZHU Jing-zhao,et al.Evaluation and Classification on Forest for Soil and Water Conservation in Low Mountain Area of Beijing City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):134.
[2]侯喜禄,梁一民,曹清玉.黄土丘陵沟壑区主要水保林类型及草地水保效益的研究[J].水土保持研究,1991,(02):96.
　Hou Xilu,Liang Yimin,Cao Qingyu.A STUDY ON BENEFITS OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION BY MAIN WOODLAND AND GRASSLAND TYPES IN LOESS HILLY REGION[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1991,(03):96.
[3]侯喜禄,梁一民.黄土丘陵沟壑区水土保持林体系建设及效益分析[J].水土保持研究,1991,(02):124.
　Hou Xilu,Liang Yimin.CONSTRUCTION OF FOREST SYSTEM FOR SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION AND ITS BENEFITS IN LOESS HILLY REGION[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1991,(03):124.
[4]方万泉.南方水土保持林引种选择[J].水土保持研究,2000,7(03):231.
　FANG Wan-quan.The Selected Trees Species of Forest for Soil and Water Conservation in South[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2000,7(03):231.
[5]方万泉.南方水土保持林引种选择[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(02):159.
　FANG Wan-quan.Selected Trees Species for Forest of Soil and Water Conservation in South China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2002,9(03):159.
[6]夏江宝,陈仲杰,刘信儒,等.山地水土保持林改良土壤效应的研究[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(01):170.
　XIA Jiang-bao,CHEN Zhong-jie,LIU Xin-ru,et al.Study on Effect of Soil and Water Conservation Vegetation on Soil Amelioration in Hilly Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(03):170.
[7]步兆东.辽西地区水土保持林合理经营技术及可持续发展理论初探[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(06):383.
　BU Zhao-dong.Preliminary Discussion on Reasonable Management and Persistent Development of Soil and Water Conservation Forest in Liaoning West Districts[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(03):383.
[8]王小明,周本智,钟绍柱,等.富春江流域人工阔叶幼林涵养水源效果分析[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(06):115.
　WANG Xiao-ming,ZHOU Ben-zhi,ZHONG Shao-zhu,et al.The Eco-hydrological Effect of Young Broadleaved Plantation in Fuchun River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(03):115.
[9]杨贤均,邓云叶,段林东.三种不同林分的保护水土功能分析[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(02):177.
　YANG Xianjun,DENG Yunye,DUAN Lindong.Analysis on Soil and Water Protection Functions of Three Types of Stands[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(03):177.
[10]刘宪钊,张静伟.渭北地区水土保持林经营现状及分析[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(03):257.
　LIU Xian-zhao,ZHANG Jing-wei.The Present Management Situation and Analysis of Soil and Water Conservation Forest in Weibei Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(03):257.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2008-11-25。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金（40771042）；“十一五”国家科技攻关课题（2006BAD03A1304）
作者简介:杨平（1984- ），男，贵州台江县人，在读硕士研究生，主要从事土壤及植物营养研究。E-mail：yangping6666@163.com
通讯作者:王海燕（1972- ），女，北京人，副教授，主要从事植物营养及土壤污染研究。E-mail：haiyanwang72@yahoo.com.cn

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01