XIAO Jing-kai,LI Jun-hong,HUANG Jin-huang.Evaluation of Indirect Benefits From Rural Development and Debris Flow Prevention Plans-Case of Huashan Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(05):42-48,91.
农村建设与土石流防治计划之间接效益评估——以华山地区为例
- Title:
- Evaluation of Indirect Benefits From Rural Development and Debris Flow Prevention Plans-Case of Huashan Area
- 分类号:
- P642.23
- 摘要:
- 为减少土石流对华山地区居民生命与财产的危害，并且发展农村经济，政府部门在该区实施土石流防治和农村建设计划。过去的相关研究显示，这些计划在维护居民生活品质、环境及农村文化等方面的效益大都被忽视，因而低估了整体的防治效益，也使政府资源无法达到最有效率配置的境界。将在防治计划可使土石流风险降低的考量下，利用双界二元选择模型评估以个人愿付数额所表示的间接效益，并探讨该效益与土石流影响认知因素、土石流影响集群、社区认同集群与社经变量等影响变量之间的关系，然后进一步利用最小显著差异性检定探讨受访样本群组在间接效益评价上之差异。
- Abstract:
- Public Sector had used debris flow prevention and rural development plans to mitigate the damage of resident’s life and properties caused by the debris flow in the Huashan area.In the past,previous studies of debris flow prevention and rural development plan have shown that the evaluation for the quality of life,environment and rural culture,has been ignored and thus underestimated the total benefits and failed to attain the efficiency of resources allocation.The purpose of this study is to establish an empirical model of evaluation of indirect benefits from debris flow risk reduction by using double bound dichotomous choice model,and analyze the affecting factors of willingness to pay,such as perception factors and clusters of debris flow and socio-economics backgrounds.Furthermore,this study will use least significant difference test to evaluate the difference among different groups from evaluation of indirect benefits and estimate the indirect benefits.
参考文献/References:
[1] 吴铭志.地质环境与土石流[J].成功大学校刊, 2001, 196:14-15.
[2] 陈荣俊, 翁志成, 章裕宾.华山土石流整治与农村建设成果[J].农政与农情, 2004, 150:33-38.
[3] 杨昆霖, 杨文灿.游客对乡镇举办产业文化活动之成效认知分析-以2000年台南白河莲花节为例[A].第五届(2001年)"国土规划论坛"学术研讨会[C].2001.
[4] 刘健哲.农村规划与农民参与[J].农业金融论丛, 2000, 43:147-146.
[5] 刘锦添.环境风险降低的价值评估-台湾的实证研究[J]."中央研究院"经济研究所, 1992, 20:679-695.
[6] 萧景楷, 李俊鸿.洪灾风险降低之健康效益分析[A].台湾农业与资源经济学会2004年年会暨第三届学术研讨会[C].台中, 2004.
[7] 谢正伦."9·21"震后灾区土石流二次灾害防治之研究[J].成功大学校刊, 2001, 196;25-42.
[8] 钟森宇.以社区营造方式办理农村社区建设之研究-以云林县古坑乡华山社区为例[D].云林科技大学营建工程系, 2003.
[9] Hanemann, W M, J Loomis, B Kanninen.Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation[J].American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1991, 73(4):1255-1263.
[10] Johannesson, M, B Jonsson, L Borgquist.Willingness to Pay for Antihypertensive Therapy-Results of a Swedish Pilot Study[J].Journal of Health Economics, 1991, 10:461-73.
[11] Kahn, M E.Education’s Role in Explaining Diabetic Health Investment Differential[J].Economics of Education Review, 1998, 17(3):257-266.
[12] Kahn, M E.Diabetic Risk Taking:The Role of Information, Education and Medication[J].Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1999, 18(2):147-164.
[13] Lawless, Jerald F.Statistical Models and Methods, for Lifetime Data 2nd[M].NY:Wiley, 2003.
[14] 条件评价法中的双界二元选择模型的估计值较其它估计方法更具有效性, 因此本研究利用此估计法推估间接效益.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2005-7-8
作者简介:萧景楷，中兴大学应用经济学系教授